Abstract
In a globalized world, differences between individuals are salient as they belong to various social, cultural, and historical backgrounds. This salience is particularly prominent in the United States, wherein mainstream ideologies and socio-political structures that undergird the diversity of a global world, contribute towards the intricacies of individual identity evaluation by encapsulating various ethnic, cultural, migratory, and geopolitical scenarios.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appiah, K. A. (2001). Liberalism, individuality, and identity. Critical Inquiry, 27(2), 305–332.
Appiah, K. A. (2006). The ethics of identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bhatia, S. (2011). Acculturation and the dialogical formation of immigrant identity: Race and culture in diaspora spaces. In H. M. Hermans & T. Gieser (Eds.), Handbook of dialogical self theory (pp. 115–131). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83–93.
Clarke, D. (2003). Descartes’s theory of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coakley, L. (2014). Racialised inequality, anti-racist strategies and the workings of the ‘dialogical self’: A case study in the shifting construction of migrant identity in Ireland. Irish Journal of Sociology, 22(1), 51–66.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–167.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 6, 1241–1299.
Crossley, N. (1996). Intersubjectivity: The fabric of social becoming. London: Sage.
Dumont, L. (1985). A modified view of our origins: The Christian beginnings of modern individualism. In M. Carrithers, S. Collins, & S. Lukes (Eds.), In the category of the person (pp. 93–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243–281.
Hermans, H. J. M. (2003). The construction and reconstruction of a dialogical self. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 16(2), 89–130.
Hermans, H. J. M. (2014). Self as a society of i-positions: A dialogical approach to counseling. Journal of Humanistic Counselling, 53, 134–159.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Gieser, T. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of dialogical self theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hermans, H. J. M., Kempen, H. J. G., & Van Loon, J. P. (1992). The dialogical self: Beyond individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist, 47, 23–33.
James, W. (1981[1890]). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kennedy, D. (1999). Philosophy for children and the reconstruction of philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 30(4), 338–359.
Kennedy, D. (2004). Communal philosophical dialogue and the intersubject. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 18(2), 201–216.
Lipman. M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Markova, I. (2003). Constitution of the self: Intersubjectivity and dialogicality. Culture and Psychology, 9(3), 249–259.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviourist (Edited with an introduction by C. Morris (1962)). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Neisser, U. (1997). Concepts and self-concepts. In U. Neisser & D. Jopling (Eds.), The conceptual self in context: Culture, experience, self-understanding (pp. 3–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 283–305.
Sampson, E. E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the self and their role in personal and societal functioning. American Psychologist, 43, 15–22.
Sharp, A. M. (2007). The classroom community of inquiry as ritual: How we can cultivate wisdom. Critical and Creative Thinking, 15(1), 3–14.
Stiles, W. B. (1999). Suppression of continuity-benevolence assumptions (CBS) voices: A theoretical note on the psychology and psychotherapy of depression: Comment. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 36(3), 268–273. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0087847
Tappan, M. B. (2005). Domination, subordination and the dialogical self: Identity development and the politics of ‘Ideological Becoming’. Culture & Psychology, 11(1), 47–75.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M., Oakes, P., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Wortham, S. (2001). Narratives in action: A strategy for research and analysis. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sequeira, L. (2017). Negotiating Intersectional Identities in a Classroom Community of Inquiry. In: Lin, CC., Sequeira, L. (eds) Inclusion, Diversity, and Intercultural Dialogue in Young People’s Philosophical Inquiry. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-065-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-065-3_3
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-065-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)