Abstract
There is a significant gap in learning environment discourse in connecting graduate attributes to affordances such as space, place, technology and pedagogy. Contemporary journals such as the International Journal of Learning Environments rarely include critical articles on aspects of the physical environment of learning communities (Cleveland & Fisher, 2014).
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Learning Environment
- Student Engagement
- Continuous Professional Development
- Learn Environment Research
- Sense Publisher
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Abassi, N. (2010, May). ‘The role of multi-purpose learning spaces in supporting 21st century curriculum’, Mayfield Project. CEFPI Annual Regional Conference on Designing for Difference, Perth.
ASMS. (2014). InnovSpace: A three-year experiment in maker spaces. Report. Adelaide: ASMS. Retrieved September 23, 2015, from https://www.asms.sa.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/InnovSpace.pdf
ASMS. (2012). Sustaining innovation through contributive leadership. Adelaide: ASMS. Retrieved from https://www.asms.sa.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ASMS-innovation-AARE-dec12.pdf
Baepler, P., Walker, J., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2013). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and Environment, 59, 678–689.doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.016
Batterham, R. (2000). The chance to change: Final report. Canberra: Department of Science, Industry and Resources.
Bissaker, K. (2010). The processes and outcomes of professional learning in an innovative school: The construction of an explanatory model (Unpublished thesis). Retrieved June 1, 2014, from http://catalogue.flinders.edu.au/local/adt/public/adt-SFU20100309.162227/n
Bissaker, K., Davies, J., & Heath, J. (2006, May 25–27). Re-thinking schooling: Reflections from the Australian science and mathematics school. Educational Research Association of Singapore (ERAS), Singapore.
Brooks, C. (2012). Space and consequences: The impact of different formal learning spaces on instructor and student behavior. Journal of Learning Spaces, (2).
Burke, C. (Ed.). (2005). Containing the school child: Architecture and pedagogies. Double special issue of the Journal Paedagogica Historica. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
Burke, C. (2016, June). Quiet stories of educational design. In K. Darian-Smith & J. Willis (Eds.), Designing schools: Space, place and pedagogy. London: Routledge (Architecture).
Burke, C. E., Grosvenor, I. E., Norlin, B. E., & Umeå universitet, H. O. (2014). Engaging with educational space: Visualizing spaces of teaching and learning. Umeå Studies In History And Education.
Churches, A. (2007). Bloom’s digital taxonomy. Retrieved from http://edorigami.wikispaces.com
Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Learning Environments, 17, 1–28. (Sense Publishers.)
Cleveland, B., & Woodman, K. (2015a). Innovative spaces and pedagogy. Master of teaching subject. Parkville: Melbourne Graduate School of Education.
Cleveland, B., & Woodman, K. (2015b). Stuff it. Retrieved from CEFPI website: www.cefpi.com
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. Learning & Skills Research Centre. Retrieved from http://www.leerbeleving.nl/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/
Erlauer, L. (2003). The Brain-compatible classroom [electronic resource]: Using what we know about learning to improve teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Fisher, K., & Ellis, R. (in press). A critical review of post 2012 literature on the evaluation/evidence-based design of new generation learning environments.
Fisher, K., & Newton, C. (2014). Transforming the twenty-first-century campus to enhance the net-generation student learning experience: Using evidence-based design to determine what works and why in virtual/physical teaching spaces. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(5), 903–920.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 111(23), 8410–8415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London & New York, NY: Routledge.
HERD. (2015). Health environments research journal. Retrieved from http://her.sagepub.com
Jankowska, M., & Atlay, M. (2008). Use of creative space in enhancing students’ engagement. Innovations In Education & Teaching International, 45(3), 271–279. doi:10.1080/14703290802176162
Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the brain in mind (2nd ed., rev., updated ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
JISC. (2010). Joint information services committee. Retrieved September 23, 2015, from http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140614151101/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearninginnovation/learningspaces.aspx
Lackney, J. A. (2015). History of the schoolhouse in the USA. In R. Walden (Ed.), Schools for the future: Design proposals from architectural psychology. Koblenz, Germany: Springer.
MGSE. (2015). Clinical teaching. Retrieved from http://education.unimelb.edu.au/about_us/clinical_teaching
MIT. (1999). TEAL: Technology-enhanced active learning. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/edtech/casestudies/teal.html
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2011). Fostering student engagement campuswide – Annual results 2011. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Cantre for Postsecondary Research.
NCCREST. (2015). National centre for culturally responsive educational systems. Retrieved from http://cobbesol.org/ESOL/index.php/professional-learning/62-professional-learning/esol-endorsement/cultural-issues/316-national-center-for-culturally-responsive-educational-systems-nccrest.
Oblinger, D. (2006). Learning spaces. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/books/learning-spaces
Prain, V., Cox, P., Deed, C., Edwards, D., Farrelly, C., Keeffe, M., Lovejoy, V., Mow, L., Waldrip, B., & Yager, Z. (Eds.). (2014). Adapting to teaching and learning in open-plan schools. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Rodwell, G. (1998). Open-plan school architecture: A continuation of a tradition of bureaucratically imposed innovation in Australian State Schools. Education Research and Perspectives, 25(2), 99–119.
Sanoff, H. (2001). School building assessment methods. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
Scott-Webber, L., Strickland, A., & Kapitula, L. R. (2013). Built environments impact behaviors: Results of an active learning post-occupancy evaluation. Planning for Higher Education, (1), 28.
Steelcase. (2015). An arizona state study: Movement in the workplace. 360 Magazine, November 11(67). Retrieved from https://www.steelcase.com/insights/articles/an-arizona-state-study-movement-in-the-workplace/
Ulrich, R., Quan, X., Zimring, C., Joseph, A., & Choudhary, R. (2005, May). Abstract supplement to a report to The Center for Health DesignSM for the Designing the 21st Century Hospital Project. The Center for Health DesignSM.
Walden, R. (Ed.). (2015). Schools for the future: Design proposals from architectural psychology. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Waldrip, P., Cox, P., & Jin Yu, J. (2014). Quantitative research on personalising learning and wellbeing in open-plan up-scaled learning communities. In V. Prain, P. Cox, C. Deed, D. Edwards, C. Farrelly, M. Keeffe, V. Lovejoy, L. Mow, P. Sellings, B. Waldrip, & Z. Yager. (Eds.), Adapting to teaching and learning in open-plan schools. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Walker, J. D., Brooks, D. C., & Baepler, P. (2011). Pedagogy and space: Empirical research on new learning environments. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 34(4), 1.
Well Certification. (2015). Well building standard: Educational facilities pilot Addendum. Retrieved from http://www.wellcertified.com/articles/international-well-building-institute-launches-pilot-programs-new-market-sectors
Whiteside, A. L., Brooks, D. C., & Walker, J. D. (2010). Making the case for space: Three years of empirical research on learning environments. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 33(3).
Williams, C., Armstrong, D., & Malcolm, C. (1985). The negotiable environment: People, White collar work and the office. Ann Arbor, MI: Facility Management Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fisher, K. (2016). Emerging Evaluation Knowledge in New Generation Learning Environments. In: Imms, W., Cleveland, B., Fisher, K. (eds) Evaluating Learning Environments. Advances in Learning Environments Research. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-537-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-537-1_12
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-537-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)