Abstract
Thanks Dr Dave. I’m glad you like the idea for my Spider-Bat and I will definitely try and fix those ears and I agree that my critter does seem a little defenceless. I will make sure to think about some ways in which my Spider-Bat can avoid being lunch!! Thanks again.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Aikenhead, G. (1996). Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1–52 [Published online 2008]. doi:10.1080/03057269608560077
Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. doi:10.1126/science.1204153
Bransford, J., & Schwartz, D. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61–100. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1167267
Cazden, C. (1981). Performance before competence: Assistance to child discourse in the zone of proximal development. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 3(1), 5–8.
Chubb, I. (2014). Australia needs a strategy. Science, 345(6200), 985. doi:10.1126/science.1259741
De Witt, J., Osborne, J., Archer, L., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). Young children’s aspirations in science: The unequivocal, the uncertain and the unthinkable. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 1037–1063.
Duit, R. (2007). STCSE – Bibliography: Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Kiel, Germany: IPN-Leibniz Institute for Science Education. Retrieved from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning in science – From behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. J. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education, part 1(pp. 3–25). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. doi:10.3102/0091732X07309371
Freeman, B., Marginson, S., & Tytler, R. (Eds.). (2015). The age of STEM: Policy and practice in science, technology, engineering and mathematics across the world. Oxon, England: Routledge.
Haste, H. (2004). Science in my future: A study of the values and beliefs in relation to science and technology amongst 11–21 year olds. London, UK: Nestlé Social Research Programme.
Kuhn, D. (2015). Thinking together and alone. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 46–53. doi:10.3102/0013189X15569530
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 371–387). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lemke, J. L. (2015). Demonstrating the value of informal learning. Retrieved from http://www.jaylemke.com/
Linn, M. Davis, E., & Bell, P. (2013). Internet environments for science education. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2010). The significance of educational dialogues between primary school children. In K. Littleton & C. Howe (Eds.), Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction (pp. 271–288). Milton Park, Oxon: Routledge.
Liu, Y., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2014). Secondary biology teachers’ use of different types of diagrams for different purposes. In B. Eilam & J. K. Gilbert (Eds.), Science teachers’ use of visual representations (pp. 103–121). Switzerland, Europe: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06526-7_5
Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 591–613. doi:10.1080/09500690500339621
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London, UK: Nuffield Foundation.
Sadler, T. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. doi:10.1002/tea.20009
Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2007). Science education and youth’s identity construction—two incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in the science curriculum (pp. 231–247). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
The Future is Wild. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.thefutureiswild.com
The Global School. (2015). Retrieved from http://theglobalschool.net/science/
Tytler, R. (2007). Reimagining science education: Engaging students in Australia’s future. ACER. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/aer/3
Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P., & Waldrip, B. (Eds.). (2013). Constructing representations to learn in science. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Vygotsky, L. (1981/1986). In A. Kozulin (Ed.), Thought and language (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Waldrip, B., & Prain, V. (2006). Changing representations to learn primary science concepts. Teaching Science, 52(4), 17–21. Retrieved from http://www.asta.edu.au/resources/teachingscience
Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. (2010). Using multi-modal representations to improve learning in junior secondary science. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 65–80. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9157-6
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prain, V., Waldrip, B., Lovejoy, V. (2015). “They Can’t Just Google the Correct Answer”. In: Prain, V., et al. Personalising Learning in Open-Plan Schools. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-193-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-193-9_8
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-193-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)