Skip to main content

Child Participation as the Holy Grail: Effective and Meaningful Participation in Judicial Proceedings?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Myth or Lived Reality

Abstract

The aim of this contribution is to reflect on how to ensure the effective participation of children in judicial procedures as a fundamental right of the child. The child’s right to participation has received much scholarly attention. Child participation has been hailed as a legal recognition of the fact that children are bearers of rights, and therefore have the right to take part in important decisions that shape their lives. However, the principle of child participation has also been scrutinised for being ineffective and void of real meaning. This chapter analyses the participation of children in two legal systems in the Netherlands: the immigration system and the youth care system. It describes the opportunities for children to participate in the decision-making that takes place in these two systems. The interests of children may be the same as their parents’ interests, or differ from them. The state may take a decision that runs counter to what children and parents perceive to be in their interest. At the heart of these tensions lies the issue of child participation, and the related concepts of the ‘best interests’ of the child and ‘self-determination’. In this contribution it is argued that effective participation not only requires reflection upon practical or technical conditions—such as the manner in which children are informed about the procedure, and whether or not they receive legal (or other appropriate assistance) from well-trained professionals and child-friendly environments—but that it also requires profound reflection upon the nature and purpose of laws, policies and practices: do these allow for the effective and meaningful participation of children?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In accordance with Article 1 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), children are persons below the age of 18. In this contribution, the terms children and young people are both used to refer to persons below the age of 18.

  2. 2.

    See for example: Lundy 2007; Thomas 2007; Tisdall et al. 2008; Donnelly and Kilkelly 2011; Parkes 2013; Rap 2016; Henaghan 2017; Couzens 2017; Daly 2018; Mol 2019; Liefaard 2019.

  3. 3.

    Liefaard and Sloth-Nielsen 2017.

  4. 4.

    Collins 2017; Lundy 2018.

  5. 5.

    United Nations General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of the Child, resolution 44/25 (20 November 1989).

  6. 6.

    Tobin 2019.

  7. 7.

    UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2009, paras 41–46.

  8. 8.

    This study is financed by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, grant no. 451-17-007 4135, 2018–2021.

  9. 9.

    Klep conducts the research project: Children’s rights at the municipal level: Access to (social) justice in voluntary youth care in the Netherlands. This study is funded by the Leiden University Fund/Kroese-Duijsters Fonds.

  10. 10.

    UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2009, para 20.

  11. 11.

    UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2009, para 21.

  12. 12.

    UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2009, para 34.

  13. 13.

    UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2009, paras 25 and 80.

  14. 14.

    UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2009, para 134(a).

  15. 15.

    UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2009, para 82.

  16. 16.

    UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2009, para 43.

  17. 17.

    The four general principles are: the non-discrimination principle (Article 2 CRC), the best interests of the child principle (Article 3(1) CRC), the right to life and development (Article 6 CRC) and the right to be heard (Article 12 CRC).

  18. 18.

    Compare: UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2009, paras 70–74, and UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2013, paras 50–54.

  19. 19.

    UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2013, para IV, B, 3; UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2009, para 74.

  20. 20.

    UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2013, para V, 2, B.

  21. 21.

    UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2003, para 12.

  22. 22.

    See, for example, Tisdall 2017.

  23. 23.

    De Graaf et al. 2012.

  24. 24.

    Limbeek and Bruning 2014.

  25. 25.

    See Liefaard et al. 2019.

  26. 26.

    UN Committee on the Rights of the Child 2009, para 132.

  27. 27.

    Hart 1992, p. 9.

  28. 28.

    Lundy 2007, pp. 932–933.

  29. 29.

    Lundy 2018, p. 343.

  30. 30.

    Lundy 2018.

  31. 31.

    Tisdall 2015, p. 188.

  32. 32.

    Cornwall 2008, in Tisdall 2015, p. 188.

  33. 33.

    See Tisdall 2016.

  34. 34.

    Tisdall 2015, p. 192.

  35. 35.

    Tisdall 2015, p. 196.

  36. 36.

    Tisdall 2015, p. 196.

  37. 37.

    CBS 2019a, b.

  38. 38.

    See Article 25(1) European Union, Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast), Official Journal of the European Union, L180/60.

  39. 39.

    Smyth 2014; Kennan and Kilkelly 2015; Mannion 2016; Stalford 2018.

  40. 40.

    Van Os 2018.

  41. 41.

    Chase 2013; Werkgroep Kind in azc 2014, 2016; Werkgroep Kind in azc/COA/Avance 2018; Uzozie and Verkade 2016; Darmanaki Farahani and Bradley 2018.

  42. 42.

    Kohli 2006; Kalverboer and Winter 2006; Kalverboer et al. 2009; Chase 2010.

  43. 43.

    See, for example, Kloosterboer 2009.

  44. 44.

    Council of Europe 2018; see also Kloosterboer 2009; Chase 2010.

  45. 45.

    European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) 2015.

  46. 46.

    See Rosani 2020.

  47. 47.

    Crock 2015.

  48. 48.

    Pobjoy 2016.

  49. 49.

    Lidén and Rusten 2007; Duivenvoorde 2018.

  50. 50.

    UNHCR/UNICEF 2014.

  51. 51.

    Kinderombudsman 2019.

  52. 52.

    Reneman 2014.

  53. 53.

    Lansdown 2005; Cederborg 2015; Crock 2015; Ottosson and Lundberg 2013; ENOC Taskforce children on the move 2016.

  54. 54.

    Werkgroep Kind in azc/COA/Avance 2018.

  55. 55.

    Pobjoy 2016.

  56. 56.

    Ottosson and Lundberg 2013, p. 284.

  57. 57.

    Lundberg and Lind 2017.

  58. 58.

    Lidén and Rusten 2007; see also Pobjoy 2016.

  59. 59.

    Thorburn Stern 2015.

  60. 60.

    Kalverboer and Zijlstra 2006.

  61. 61.

    Reneman 2014.

  62. 62.

    Kalverboer and Zijlstra 2006.

  63. 63.

    ECLI:NL:RVS:2018:3171. See also Rodrigues 2019.

  64. 64.

    Staatsblad 2014, 105, Wet van 1 maart 2014 inzake regels over de gemeentelijke verantwoordelijkheid voor preventie, ondersteuning, hulp en zorg aan jeugdigen en ouders bij opgroei- en opvoedingsproblemen, psychische problemen en stoornissen (Jeugdwet) [Act of 1 March 2014 on regulations concerning the municipal responsibility concerning prevention, support, help and care for children and their parents in case of problems in growing up and upbringing, psychological problems and disorders (Youth Act)].

  65. 65.

    CBS 2018.

  66. 66.

    Bruning et al. 2016a, p. 250.

  67. 67.

    Bruning et al. 2016a, b; Rap et al. 2019.

  68. 68.

    Bruning et al. 2016a, p. 250.

  69. 69.

    Bruning et al. 2016b, p. 6.

  70. 70.

    Bruning et al. 2016a, p. 256.

  71. 71.

    Bruning et al. 2016b, pp. 44, 45; Rap et al. 2019, p. 43.

  72. 72.

    Rap et al. 2019, pp. 43, 46.

  73. 73.

    Rap et al. 2019, p. 43.

  74. 74.

    Bruning et al. 2016b, pp. 17, 18.

  75. 75.

    Bruning et al. 2016a, p. 255.

  76. 76.

    Rap et al. 2019, p. 46.

  77. 77.

    Bucx et al. 2018, p. 233, p. 236 and p. 240.

  78. 78.

    Rap et al. 2019, p. 46.

  79. 79.

    Bruning et al. 2016b, p. 15, pp. 19-20.

  80. 80.

    Friele et al. 2018.

  81. 81.

    Friele et al. 2018, pp. 85 and 553–554.

  82. 82.

    Nationale Ombudsman 2017, p. 4.

  83. 83.

    Friele et al. 2018, p. 81; Nationale Ombudsman 2017, p. 4.

  84. 84.

    AKJ 2018, p. 5.

  85. 85.

    Kinderombudsman 2018, p. 12.

  86. 86.

    In the Netherlands, three local children’s ombudsmen are active, in The Hague, Amsterdam and Rotterdam.

  87. 87.

    Kinderombudsman Rotterdam 2018.

  88. 88.

    Council of Europe 2010; European Commission 2011; Council of Europe 2016; European Commission 2017.

  89. 89.

    United Nations General Assembly, Convention related to the Status of Refugees. Text of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. Text of the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, Resolution 2198 (XXI).

  90. 90.

    Stalford 2018. See also Van Willigen 2003; Doornbos 2006; Shamseldin 2012; Hedlund 2017; Rap 2020.

  91. 91.

    Smyth 2014, p. 131.

  92. 92.

    UNHCR 2009, para 73.

  93. 93.

    Friele et al. 2018, p. 554.

  94. 94.

    Bessant and Broadley 2014; Van Bijleveld et al. 2015; Daly 2017.

  95. 95.

    Masson 2000; Daly 2017; Leviner 2018.

  96. 96.

    Tisdall and Morrison 2012; Collins 2017; Daly 2017.

  97. 97.

    Daly and Rap 2018, p. 16; McMellon and Tisdall 2020, p. 169.

References

  • AKJ (2018) Vertrouwenswerk in de jeugdhulp. Publieksjaarverslag 2018, https://www.akj.nl/publieksjaarverslag-2018/ (accessed 29 March 2020)

  • Bessant J, Broadley K (2014) Saying and doing. Child Protective Service and participation in decision-making. International Journal of Children’s Rights 22:710–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruning MR, Rap SE, Verkroost DS (2016a) Participatie van minderjarigen in de vrijwillige jeugdhulp. Tijdschrift Voor Familie- en Jeugdrecht 11:250–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruning MR, Rap SE, Verkroost DS (2016b) Kansen en momenten voor participatie in het jeugdhulptraject. Eerste deel van een onderzoek naar de participatie van kinderen in de jeugdhulpverlening. University Leiden, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucx F, Pehlivan T, Sadiraj K, Rutjes L, De Haan J (2018) Deelstudie cliënten. In: Friele RD, Bruning MR, Bastiaanssen ILW, De Boer R, Bucx AJEH, De Groot JF, Pehlivan T, Rutjes L, Sondeijker F, Van Yperen TA, Hageraats R (eds) Eerste evaluatie Jeugdwet. Na de transitie nu de transformatie. ZonMw, The Hague, pp 224–286

    Google Scholar 

  • CBS (2018) Jeugdhulp. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/publicatie/2019/18/jeugdhulp-2018 (accessed 13 March 2020)

  • CBS (2019a) StatLine, Alleenstaande minderjarige vreemdeling; nationaliteit, geslacht en leeftijd

    Google Scholar 

  • https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/82045NED/table?dl=240BD (accessed 13 March 2020)

  • CBS (2019b) StatLine, Asielverzoeken en nareizigers; nationaliteit, geslacht en leeftijd

    Google Scholar 

  • https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/83102NED/table?dl=240BF (accessed 13 March 2020)

  • Cederborg A-C (2015) Children’s Right to be Heard from their Unique Perspectives. In: Mahmoudi S, Leviner P, Kaldal A, Lainpelto K (eds) Child-friendly Justice: A Quarter of a Century of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase E (2010) Agency and silence: Young people seeking asylum alone in the UK. British Journal of Social Work 40:2050–2065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase E (2013) Security and subjective wellbeing: the experiences of unaccompanied young people seeking asylum in the UK. Sociology of Health and Illness 35:6:858–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins TM (2017) A child’s right to participate: Implications for international child protection. The International Journal of Human Rights 21:1:14–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (2010) Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on child-friendly justice, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 November 2010 at the 1098th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies. Council of Europe, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (2016) Strategy for the Rights of the Child (2016-2021). Council of Europe, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (2018) Child-friendly information for children in migration. What do children think? Council of Europe, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Couzens M (2017) Child Participation in Local Governance. In: Ruck MD, Peterson-Badali M, Freeman M (eds) Handbook of Children’s Rights. Global and multidisciplinary perspectives. Routledge, New York/London, pp 515–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Crock ME (2015) Justice for the Migrant Child: The Protective Force of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. In: Mahmoudi S, Leviner P, Kaldal A, Lainpelto K (eds) Child-friendly Justice: A Quarter of a Century of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 221–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly A (2017) Children, autonomy and the courts: Beyond the right to be heard. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly A (2018) No Weight for “Due Weight”? A Children’s Autonomy Principle in Best Interest Proceedings. International Journal of Children’s Rights 26:1:61–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly A, Rap S (2018) Children’s Participation in Youth Justice and Civil Court Proceedings. In: Liefaard T, Kilkelly U (eds) The International Human Rights of Children. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Darmanaki Farahani L, Bradley GL (2018) The Role of Psychosocial Resources in the Adjustment of Migrant Adolescents. Journal of the Pacific Rim Psychology 12:3:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • De Graaf JH, Limbeek MMC, Bahadur NN, Van der Meij N (2012) De toepassing van het Internationaal Verdrag inzake de Rechten van het Kind in de Nederlandse rechtspraak. Ars Aequi Libri, Nijmegen

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly M, Kilkelly U (2011) Participation in healthcare: the views and experiences of children and young people. International Journal of Children’s Rights 19:1:107–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doornbos N (2006) Op verhaal komen. Institutionele communicatie in de asielprocedure. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen

    Google Scholar 

  • Duivenvoorde S (2018) Het participatierecht van minderjarige vreemdelingen in de Nederlandse Asielprocedure. Journaal Vreemdelingenrecht 3:19:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • ENOC Taskforce children on the move (2016) Safety and fundamental rights at stake for children on the move. De Kinderombudsman/Barnombudsmannen

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. An EU Agenda for the Rights of the Child, COM(2011) 60 final

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2017) Communication from the commission to the European Parliament and Council. The protection of children in migration, COM(2017) 211 final

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (2015) Guardianship systems for children deprived of parental care in the European Union. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Friele RD, Bruning MR, Bastiaanssen ILW, De Boer R, Bucx AJEH, De Groot JF, Pehlivan T, Rutjes L, Sondeijker F, Van Yperen TA, Hageraats R (eds) (2018) Eerste evaluatie Jeugdwet. Na de transitie nu de transformatie. ZonMw, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart RA (1992) Children’s Participation. From tokenism to citizenship. UNICEF International Child Development Centre, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund D (2017) Constructions of Credibility in Decisions Concerning Unaccompanied Minors. International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care 13:2:157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henaghan M (2017) Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Children. Where Have We Come from, Where Are We Now and Where to from Here? International Journal of Children’s Rights 25:2:537–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalverboer ME, Winter H (2006) Asielgezinnen en kinderrechten. Het belang van het kind en het recht op ontwikkeling in de Nederlandse asielpraktijk. Journaal Vreemdelingenrecht 10:199–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalverboer ME, Zijlstra AE (2006) Kinderen uit asielzoekersgezinnen en het recht op ontwikkeling. Het belang van het kind in het Vreemdelingenrecht. Uitgeverij SWP, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalverboer ME, Zijlstra AE, Knorth EJ (2009) The developmental consequences for asylum-seeking children living with the prospect for five years or more of enforced return to their home country. European Journal of Migration and Law 11:41–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennan N, Kilkelly U (2015) Children’s involvement in criminal, civil and administrative judicial proceedings in the 28 Member States of the EU. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinderombudsman (2018) Het werk van de Kinderombudsman in 2018. Online jaaroverzicht 2018. https://www.dekinderombudsman.nl (Accessed: 29 March 2020)

  • Kinderombudsman (2019) Briefrapport KOM002/2019. De Kinderombudsman, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinderombudsman Rotterdam (2018) Jaarverslag Gemeentelijke Kinderombudsman, https://www.kinderombudsmanrotterdam.nl/web/uploads/2019/04/Jaarverslag-gemeentelijke-kinderombudsman-2018.pdf (accessed 29 March 2020)

  • Kloosterboer K (2009) Kind in het centrum. Kinderrechten in asielzoekerscentra. UNICEF, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli RKS (2006) The sound of silence: Listening to what unaccompanied asylum-seeking children say and do not say. British Journal of Social Work 36:707–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown G (2005) The evolving capacities of the child. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Leviner P (2018) Child participation in the Swedish child protection system. International Journal of Children’s Rights 26:1:136–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidén H, Rusten H (2007) Asylum, Participation, and the Best Interests of the Child: New Lessons from Norway. Children and Society 21:273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liefaard T (2019) Access to Justice for Children: Towards a Specific Research and Implementation Agenda. International Journal of Children’s Rights 27:195–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liefaard T, Rap S, Rodrigues P (2019) Monitoring Children’s Rights in the Netherlands. Volume 1 – 30 Years of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Leiden University Press, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefaard T, Sloth-Nielsen J (2017) 25 Years CRC: Reflections on Successes, Failures and the Future. In: Liefaard T, Sloth-Nielsen J (eds) The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: Taking Stock after 25 Years and Looking Ahead. Brill, Leiden, pp 1–13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Limbeek MMC, Bruning MR (2014) The Netherlands. Two Decades of the CRC in Dutch Case Law. In: Liefaard T, Doek JE (eds) Litigating the Rights of the Child. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in Domestic and International Jurisprudence. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 89–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg A, Lind J (2017) Technologies of displacement and children’s right to asylum in Sweden. Human Rights Review 18:189–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundy L (2007) ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal 33:6:927–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundy L (2018) In defence of tokenism? Children's right to participate in collective decision-making, Childhood 25:3:340–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannion K (2016) Child Migration Matters. Children and young people’s experiences of migration. Immigrant Council of Ireland, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson JM (2000) Representation of children in England: Protecting children in child protection proceedings. Family Law Quarterly 34:3:467–495

    Google Scholar 

  • McMellon C, Tisdall EKM (2020) Children and young people’s participation rights: Looking backwards and moving forwards. International Journal of Children’s Rights 28:157–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol C (2019) Children’s Representation in Family Law Proceedings. A Comparative Evaluation in Light of Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. International Journal of Children’s Rights 27:66–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nationale ombudsman (2017) Terug aan tafel, samen de klacht oplossen. Onderzoek naar de klachtbehandeling in het sociaal domein na de decentralisaties, 2017/035. De Nationale ombudsman, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottosson L, Lundberg A (2013) People Out of Place: Advocates’ Negotiations on Children’s Participation in the Asylum Application Process in Sweden. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 27: 266–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes A (2013) Children and International Human Rights Law. The right of the child to be heard. Routledge, Oxon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pobjoy J (2016) The Child in International Refugee Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rap SE (2016) A children’s rights perspective on the participation of juvenile defendants in the youth court. International Journal of Children’s Rights 24:1:94–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rap SE (2020) The right to information of (un)accompanied refugee children: Improving refugee children’s legal position, fundamental rights’ implementation and emotional well-being in the Netherlands. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 28: 322–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Rap SE, Verkroost DS, Bruning MR (2019) Children’s participation in Dutch youth care practice: an exploratory study into the opportunities for child participation in youth care from professionals’ perspective. Child Care in Practice, 25:1:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reneman MA (2014) EU asylum procedures and the right to an effective remedy. Hart Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues P (2019) Minderjarig kind heeft zelfstandig belang bij zijn beroep, omdat hij mogelijk een sterker verblijfsrecht kan verkrijgen dan het verblijf dat hem bij zijn moeder is vergund. AB 2019/132, 988

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosani D (2020) Unaccompanied asylum-seeking children as rights holders: Theory and reality in the EU legal system in the case of age assessment and applications for international protection. In: Klaassen M, Rap SE, Rodrigues P, Liefaard T (eds) Safeguarding children’s rights in immigration law. Intersentia, Antwerp, pp 41–65

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shamseldin L (2012) Implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989 in the Care and Protection of Unaccompanied Asylum Seeking Children: Findings from Empirical Research in England, Ireland and Sweden. International Journal of Children’s Rights 20:90–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth C (2014) European Asylum Law and the Rights of the Child. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stalford H (2018) David and Goliath: Due Weight, the State and Determining Unaccompanied Children’s Fate. Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law 32:258–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas N (2007) Towards a theory of children’s participation. International Journal of Children’s Rights 15:2:199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn Stern R (2015) Unaccompanied and Separated Asylum-seeking Minors: Implementing a Rights-based Approach in the Asylum Process. In: Mahmoudi S, Leviner P, Kaldal A, Lainpelto K (eds) Child-friendly Justice: A Quarter of a Century of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 242–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall EKM (2015) Children and young people’s participation: a critical consideration of article 12. In: Vandenhole W, Desmet E, Reynaert D, Lembrechts S (eds) Routledge International Handbook of Children’s Rights Studies. Routledge, Oxon, pp 185–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall EKM (2016) Subjects with agency? Children’s participation in family law proceedings. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 38:4:362–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall EKM (2017) Conceptualising children and young people’s participation: examining vulnerability, social accountability and co-production. The International Journal of Human Rights 21:1:59–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall EKM, Davies J, Gallagher M (2008) Reflecting on children and young people’s participation in the UK. International Journal of Children’s Rights 16:3:343–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall EKM, Morrison F (2012) Children’s participation in court proceedings when parents divorce or separate: Legal constructions and lived experiences. Law and Childhood Studies: Current Legal Issues 14:156–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin J (2019) Introduction: The foundation for children’s rights. In Tobin J (ed) The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: A commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 2–22

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (2003) General measures of implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (arts. 4, 42 and 44, para. 6). General Comment No. 5. CRC/GC/2003/5, 27 November 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (2009) The right of the child to be heard. General Comment No. 12, CRC/C/GC/12, 20 July 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (2013) On the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration (art. 3, para. 1). General comment No. 14, CRC/C/GC/14, 29 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • UNHCR (2009) Guidelines on international protection: Child Asylum claims under Articles 1 (A) and 1 (F) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol relating to the Statutes of Refugees, HCR/GIP/09/08, 22 December 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • UNHCR/UNICEF (2014) Safe and Sound. What states can do to ensure respect for the best interests of unaccompanied and separated children in Europe. UNHCR/UNICEF

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzozie A, Verkade M (2016) Volg je dromen tot je niet langer kunt leven. Een retroperspectief onderzoek onder voormalige alleenstaande minderjarige asielzoekers naar toekomstbeleving. Stichting Vrienden van SAMAH

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bijleveld GG, Dedding CWM, Bunders-Aelen JFG (2015) Children’s and young people’s participation within child welfare and child protection services: a state-of-the-art review. Child & Family Social Work 20:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Os C (2018) Best Interests of the Child Assessments for recently arrived refugee children. Behavioural and children’s rights perspectives on decision-making in migration law. University of Groningen, Groningen (dissertation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Willigen LHM (2003) Verslag van de quick scan van ‘het kind in het asielbeleid’ in de praktijk. Een inventarisatie van knelpunten ten aanzien van de waarborging van een zo ongestoord mogelijke ontplooiing en ontwikkeling van kinderen die naar Nederland zijn gekomen om asiel te verkrijgen. Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Werkgroep Kind in azc (2014) ‘Het is hier in één woord gewoon…stom’. Onderzoek naar het welzijn en perspectief van kinderen en jongeren in gezinslocaties. Werkgroep kind in azc, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Werkgroep Kind in azc (2016) Zó kan het ook! Aanbevelingen voor een betere situatie van kinderen in asielzoekerscentra. Werkgroep kind in azc, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Werkgroep Kind in azc/COA/Avance (2018) Leefomstandigheden van kinderen in asielzoekerscentra en gezinslocaties. Rapportage I: Conclusies en Aanbevelingen. Werkgroep kind in azc, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie E. Rap .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rap, S.E., Klep, K.F.M. (2021). Child Participation as the Holy Grail: Effective and Meaningful Participation in Judicial Proceedings?. In: Boost, C., Broderick, A., Coomans, F., Moerland, R. (eds) Myth or Lived Reality. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-447-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-447-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-446-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-447-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics