Abstract
Digital technologies are expected to radically transform agriculture, especially as the use of collected data could influence farmers’ decision-making and facilitate precision farming. In the face of major food security challenges, production-enhancing and resource-efficient innovations in digital agriculture are generally considered beneficial. However, digital agriculture could also exacerbate existing power imbalances, dependencies and barriers to entry in the already highly concentrated agricultural inputs markets of seeds and agrochemicals, particularly since the few remaining conglomerate suppliers could misuse their market power and platforms for digital agriculture services could benefit from network effects. As data-driven digital agriculture grows rapidly as a valuable asset and an important input factor for agricultural production in the European Union, it is important to assess its role from a competition policy perspective. This chapter explains how some digital agriculture-related practices may lead to distortions of competition and deteriorations of farmers’ autonomy, but nonetheless do not necessarily violate EU competition rules. In response to these market power concerns, however, authorities may seek regulatory solutions beyond EU competition law. In that regard, (proposals for) laws on unfair trading practices, sector-specific legislation and self-regulatory mechanisms are worth exploring, not in the least on the basis of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Frum L (2014) Five years on, millions still dig ‘FarmVille’. www.edition.cnn.com/2014/07/31/tech/gaming-gadgets/farmville-fifth-anniversary/index.html (accessed July 2018); Helft M (2010) Will Zynga Become the Google of Games? www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/business/25zynga.html (accessed July 2018); Liszkiewicz A (2010) The Real Reason You Are Addicted To Farmville (And Zynga Is A $5 Billion Company). www.businessinsider.com/the-cleverest-explanation-as-to-why-zynga-is-a-multi-billion-company-you-will-ever-read-2010-4?IR=T (accessed July 2018).
- 2.
Quenqua D (2009) To Harvest Squash, www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/fashion/29farmville.html (accessed July 2018); CBC News (2010) Even real farmers play Facebook game Farmville. www.cbc.ca/news/even-real-farmers-play-facebook-game-farmville-1.897140 (accessed July 2018).
- 3.
Lamborelle and Fernández Álvarez 2016.
- 4.
- 5.
See Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products (CMO Regulation) [2013] OJ L347/672.
- 6.
For an overview, see Renda et al. 2014, pp. 385–389.
- 7.
European Commission 2018a.
- 8.
Van Es and Woodard 2017.
- 9.
The Hale Group and LSC International 2014.
- 10.
Poppe et al. 2015, p. 11.
- 11.
- 12.
Tzounis et al. 2017, p. 32.
- 13.
- 14.
Russo 2013.
- 15.
Khan 2013.
- 16.
Coble et al. 2018, p. 80.
- 17.
- 18.
Wolfert et al. 2014, pp. 267–268.
- 19.
Lianos and Katalevsky 2017, pp. 5–6.
- 20.
Keulemans 2015.
- 21.
According to the Rome Declaration on World Food Security and the World Food Summit Plan of Action, food security exists “when all people at all times have physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.”
- 22.
- 23.
Tzounis et al. 2017, p. 32.
- 24.
Lianos and Katalevsky 2017, p. 10.
- 25.
Lamborelle and Fernández Álvarez 2016.
- 26.
- 27.
Schumpeter 1942.
- 28.
Lianos and Katalevsky 2017, p. 8.
- 29.
Carbonell 2016. Environmental protection could benefit from the increased transparency, as the technologies would gather information that may be used for research purposes. In that regard, one could, for example, think of research on the Bee Colony Collapse Disorder. Related to this, the European Commission adopted new rules in May 2018, which allow satellite data to be used as evidence when checking farmers’ fulfilment of requirements under the CAP for area-based payments as well as cross-compliance requirements. See https://ec.europa.eu/info/news/modernising-cap-satellite-data-authorised-replace-farm-checks-2018-may-25_en (accessed July 2018).
- 30.
- 31.
European Commission 2017.
- 32.
Lamborelle and Fernández Álvarez 2016. Visit EIP-AGRI’s website for more information: www.ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/en/focus-groups/mainstreaming-precision-farming (accessed July 2018).
- 33.
Lamborelle and Fernández Álvarez 2016.
- 34.
For an extensive discussion of EU agriculture law and the CAP, see McMahon and Cardwell 2015.
- 35.
Johnson 2012.
- 36.
For an elaborate overview of recent consolidation processes in the agricultural input industry, see IPES-Food 2017.
- 37.
Kirchfeld A, Noel A and Winters P (2014) Monsanto Said to Have Weighed $40 Billion Syngenta Deal. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-06-23/monsanto-said-to-have-weighed-40-billion-syngenta-deal (accessed July 2018); Gillam C (2015) Monsanto drops pursuit of Swiss agribusiness rival Syngenta. www.reuters.com/article/us-syngenta-ag-m-a-monsanto/monsanto-drops-pursuit-of-swiss-agribusiness-rival-syngenta-idUSKCN0QV1SL20150826 (accessed July 2018).
- 38.
In line with its case practice, the Commission assesses parallel transactions according to the so-called ‘priority rule’ (first come, first served): European Commission (2017) Dow/DuPont (Case M.7932) [no final non-confidential version published yet]. www.ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m7932_13668_3.pdf; European Commission (2017) ChemChina/Syngenta (Case M.7962) [no final non-confidential version published yet]. www.ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m7962_4097_3.pdf (accessed July 2018); European Commission (2018a, b, c) Bayer/Monsanto (Case M.8084) [no non-confidential version published yet]. In May 2018, the U.S. Department of Justice approved the acquisition as well. Similar to commitments made in the European Commission’s merger review, Bayer made commitments to divest some assets to secure approval from the antitrust authority. See U.S. V. Bayer AG and Monsanto Company (2018) U.S. V. Bayer AG and Monsanto Company, Case 1:18-cv-0124. www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-v-bayer-ag-and-monsanto-company (accessed July 2018).
- 39.
In contrast, most players from the crop protection industry, on the other hand, felt more able to predict the future and stated that “precision agriculture will play a major role in the [European Economic Area] in the next five to 10 years.” See European Commission (2017) Dow/DuPont (Case M.7932) [no final non-confidential version published yet]. www.ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m7932_13668_3.pdf (accessed July 2018), para 246.
- 40.
Original text: “Die Digitalisierung verändert auch die Landwirtschaft radikal. Man kann für jeden Quadratmeter genau ermitteln, was die ideal dosierte Saat oder Pestizidmenge ist. Das ist faszinierend. Gerade deshalb müssen wir aufpassen, dass durch die Fusion der Wettbewerb beim Digital Farming und bei der Forschung hierzu nicht eingeschränkt wird.” Höning A and Beermann M (2018) “Wir wollen Fusionen nicht verhindern”. www.rp-online.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/margrethe-vestager-wir-wollen-fusionen-nicht-verhindern_aid-20606393 (accessed July 2018); translation from Taylor E (2018) EU says Bayer Monsanto must not hurt competition in digital farming. www.reuters.com/article/us-monsanto-m-a-bayer-eu/eu-says-bayer-monsanto-must-not-hurt-competition-in-digital-farming-paper-idUSKBN1FU0IJ (accessed July 2018).
- 41.
European Commission—DG COMP (2018) Mergers: Commission clears Bayer’s acquisition of Monsanto, subject to conditions. Press Release IP/18/2282. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-2282_en.htm (accessed July 2018).
- 42.
Porter 1979.
- 43.
DG COMP (2017) Mergers: Commission opens in-depth investigation into proposed acquisition of Monsanto by Bayer. Press Release IP/17/2762. www.europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-2762_en.htm (accessed July 2018); Bayer/Monsanto (Case M.8084), Initiation of proceedings, OJ 2017/C 286/01.
- 44.
DG COMP (2018) Mergers: Commission clears Bayer’s acquisition of Monsanto, subject to conditions. Press Release IP/18/2282. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-2282_en.htm (accessed July 2018); European Commission (2018a, b, c) Bayer/Monsanto (Case M.8084) [no non-confidential version published yet].
- 45.
Vance A (2013) Monsanto’s Billion-Dollar Bet Brings Big Data to the Farm. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-10-02/monsanto-buys-climate-corporation-for-930-million-bringing-big-data-to-the-farm (accessed July 2018); press release Monsanto (2013) Monsanto to Acquire The Climate Corporation, Combination to Provide Farmers with Broad Suite of Tools Offering Greater On-Farm Insights. www.monsanto.com/news-releases/monsanto-to-acquire-the-climate-corporation-combination-to-provide-farmers-with-broad-suite-of-tools-offering-greater-on-farm-insights/ (accessed July 2018).
- 46.
Press release Monsanto (2013) Monsanto Completes Acquisition of The Climate Corporation. www.monsanto.com/news-releases/monsanto-completes-acquisition-of-the-climate-corporation/ (accessed July 2018).
- 47.
Press release Monsanto (2016) The Climate Corporation Acquires VitalFields to Expand Digital Agriculture Innovation for European Farmers. www.monsanto.com/news-releases/the-climate-corporation-acquires-vitalfields-to-expand-digital-agriculture-innovation-for-european-farmers/ (accessed July 2018).
- 48.
Accenture 2017.
- 49.
Visit Monsanto’s website for more information: www.monsanto.com/company/monsanto-growth-ventures/ (accessed July 2018).
- 50.
Lianos and Katalevsky 2017, p. 10.
- 51.
Gillam C (2013) DuPont, with Deere & Co, to roll out precision farming program. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-farming-data/dupont-with-deere-co-to-roll-out-precision-farming-program-idUSBRE9A709920131108 (accessed July 2018); Lianos and Katalevsky 2017, p. 18: “BASF and Monsanto have collaborated since 2007 on R&D partnerships worth $2.5 billion in breeding, biotech, pesticides, ag microbials, ag biologicals, and precision agriculture.”
- 52.
For example, Monsanto has publicly expressed its desire to build a “centralized and open data platform”. See Burwood-Taylor L (2016) What do Monsanto’s Plans to Open Up its Digital Platform Mean for the Agriculture Industry? www.agfundernews.com/what-do-monsanto-plans-to-open-up-its-digital-platform-mean-for-the-agriculture-industry.html (accessed July 2018).
- 53.
European Commission 2018b.
- 54.
Olson et al. 2010, p. 10.
- 55.
- 56.
Wesseler et al. 2015, pp. 75–76.
- 57.
Ibid., 20 (see figure 6).
- 58.
European Commission (2017) Dow/DuPont (Case M.7932) [no final non-confidential version published yet]. www.ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m7932_13668_3.pdf (accessed July 2018); European Commission (2017) ChemChina/Syngenta (Case M.7962) [no final non-confidential version published yet]. www.ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m7962_4097_3.pdf (accessed July 2018); European Commission (2018a, b, c) Bayer/Monsanto (Case M.8084) [no non-confidential version published yet].
- 59.
Kritikos 2017, p. 39.
- 60.
Khan 2013: ““If you inadvertently teach Monsanto what it is that makes you a better farmer than your neighbor, it can sell that information to your neighbor,” said John McGuire, an agriculture technology consultant who runs Simplified Technology Services and developed geospatial tools for Monsanto in the late-1990s. And if the corporation gathers enough information, “it opens the door for Monsanto to say, ‘We know how to farm in your area better than you do,’” he said.”
- 61.
Kritikos 2017, p. 39.
- 62.
This is especially relevant as agricultural data as can constitute a hybrid of business, personal and intellectual property (trade secrets). Different regulatory frameworks apply to the different categories of data. Particularly, in the area of personal data recent developments can have far-reaching consequences—see, for example, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). See also Sykuta 2016, p. 57.
- 63.
Kritikos 2017, p. 40. See also DG Agriculture and Rural Development (2013) How many people work in agriculture in the European Union? www.ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-area-economics/briefs/pdf/08_en.pdf (accessed July 2018).
- 64.
Examples are taken from the Communication from the Commission—Guidance on the Commission’s enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings.
- 65.
European Commission 2013.
- 66.
On competition and algorithms in general, see OECD 2017.
- 67.
Noyes K (2014) Cropping up on every farm: Big data technology. www.fortune.com/2014/05/30/cropping-up-on-every-farm-big-data-technology/ (accessed July 2018); Kritikos 2017, pp. 15–16. John Deere has stated on its website (see www.deere.com/privacy_and_data/policies_statements/en_US/data_principles/frequently_asked_questions.page?) that it “will NOT use internally or share anonymized data to external parties who John Deere believes intend to use it to influence markets, provide an advantage to commodity traders or support supply hedging by food companies.”
- 68.
NGOs like Friends of the Earth even dubbed the acquisition of Monsanto by Bayer the ‘Merger from Hell’: www.foeeurope.org/sites/default/files/agriculture/2017/foee-ceo-baysanto-190517.pdf (accessed July 2018); www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/baysanto-the-campaign-against-the-merger-from-hell (accessed July 2018).
- 69.
Council Regulation (EC) 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (EU Merger Regulation) [2004] OJ L24/1.
- 70.
The third main pillar of EU competition policy, state aid control, is excluded from the scope of this chapter.
- 71.
Perhaps needless to say, the fact that farmers do not support or do not intend for anticompetitive effects to take place is of no relevance for the applicability of the cartel prohibition.
- 72.
Commission’s Guidelines on Vertical Restraints (2010/C 130/01), para 6 and 100; Bishop and Walker 2010, p. 191.
- 73.
Bishop and Walker 2010, p. 195.
- 74.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices (Vertical Agreements Block Exemption Regulation), L 102/1, Article 3.
- 75.
Case 27/76 United Brands v Commission (1978) ECR 207, para 65.
- 76.
This is illustrated by the Communication from the Commission—Guidance on the Commission’s enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings (emphasis added).
- 77.
Bakhoum 2018.
- 78.
European Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment 2018, p. 16.
- 79.
Falkowski et al. 2017, p. 23.
- 80.
Directive 2011/7/EU on combating late payment in commercial transactions.
- 81.
Directive 2006/114/EC concerning misleading and comparative advertising.
- 82.
Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, United Kingdom. See European Commission Staff Working Document 2018, p. 14.
- 83.
Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Sweden.
- 84.
Estonia, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands.
- 85.
See European Commission Staff Working Document 2018, p. 151.
- 86.
Recital 8 of Regulation 1/2003 states: “Member States should not under this Regulation be precluded from adopting and applying on their territory stricter national competition laws which prohibit or impose sanctions on unilateral conduct engaged in by undertakings. These stricter national laws may include provisions which prohibit or impose sanctions on abusive behaviour toward economically dependent undertakings.” For example, Germany’s §20(2) of the Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen and France’s Art L420(2), 2nd para of the Code de Commerce.
- 87.
European Commission Staff Working Document 2018, pp. 150–155.
- 88.
Supply Chain Initiative (2018) Five years of Supply Chain Initiative and future prospects. www.supplychaininitiative.eu/news/press-release-five-years-supply-chain-initiative-and-future-prospects (accessed July 2018).
- 89.
European Commission 2018a, pp. 2–3.
- 90.
See www.agdatatransparent.com/the-privacy-and-security-principles-for-farm-data/ (accessed July 2018).
- 91.
See www.agdatatransparent.com/principles/ (accessed July 2018).
- 92.
Hettinger J (2018) Few Big Ag companies have yet to follow through on data transparency pledge. www.newfoodeconomy.org/big-ag-follow-through-farm-bureau-data-transparency-pledge/ (accessed July 2018): “Among those who have yet to do so are some of the industry’s biggest players – Monsanto, Dow DuPont, John Deere and CNH Industrial, the equipment manufacturing company that makes both the Case IH and New Holland brands of combines, tractors and other equipment.” Also Ferris 2017 (p. 310) questioned the effectiveness of the principles, noting that “these are simply voluntary standards which do not hold the force of law.”
- 93.
European Commission 2018c.
- 94.
European Commission 2018a. The proposed directive is the result of a long process, in which the Commission involved stakeholders and academia. Already in 2010, it set up a High Level Forum for a Better Functioning Food Supply Chain, which helped to launch a voluntary code of conduct, the SCI’s Principles of Good Practice, in 2013. Other subsequent initiatives included the establishment of the Agricultural Markets Task Force in 2016, and the launch of an inception impact assessment and a public consultation on the improvement of the food supply chain in 2017. The Commission’s co-legislators, the European Parliament and the Council, have also not been silent on the matter of UTPs. Both institutions called on the Commission—through a resolution (2015/2065(INI)) and conclusions (press release 769/16), resp.—to submit a proposal.
- 95.
European Commission 2018a, Article 1(2).
- 96.
European Commission 2018b.
- 97.
European Commission 2018b, Article 1(2).
References
Accenture (2017) Digital Agriculture: Improving Profitability. Available at www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/Accenture/Conversion-Assets/DotCom/Documents/Global/PDF/Digital_3/Accenture-Digital-Agriculture-Point-of-View.pdf. Accessed July 2018
American Farm Bureau Federation (2016) Farm Bureau Survey: Farmers Want to Control Their Own Data. Available at www.fb.org/newsroom/farm-bureau-survey-farmers-want-to-control-their-own-data. Accessed July 2018
Bakhoum M (2018) Abuse Without Dominance in Competition Law: Abuse of Economic Dependence and its Interface with Abuse of Dominance. In: Di Porto F, Podszun R (eds) Abusive Practices in Competition Law. Edward Elgar (forthcoming)
Bishop S, Walker M (2010) The Economics of EC Competition Law: Concepts, Applications and Measurement, 3rd edn. Sweet & Maxwell, London
Carbonell I (2016) The ethics of big data in agriculture. Internet Policy Review 5:1–13
Coble KH, Mishra AK, Ferrell S, Griffin T (2018) Big Data in Agriculture: A Challenge for the Future. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 40:79–96
Dowell T (2015) Big Data on the Farm (Part I): What Is It? Available at www.agrilife.org/texasaglaw/2015/09/01/big-data-on-the-farm-part-i-what-is-it/. Accessed July 2018
EIP-AGRI Seminar (2016) Data revolution: emerging new data-driven business models in the agri-food sector. Available at www.ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri-eip/files/eip-agri_seminar_data_revolution_final_report_2016_en.pdf. Accessed July 2018
ETC Group (2015) Breaking Bad: Big Ag Mega-Mergers in Play Dow + DuPont in the Pocket? Next: Demonsanto? Available at www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/files/etc_breakbad_23dec15.pdf. Accessed July 2018
European Commission (2013) Green Paper on Unfair Trading Practices in the Business-to-Business Food and Non-Food Supply Chain in Europe, COM(2013) 37 final
European Commission (2017) European Union funds digital research and innovation for agriculture to tackle societal challenges. Available at www.ec.europa.eu/info/news/european-union-funds-digital-research-and-innovation-agriculture-tackle-societal-challenges_en. Accessed July 2018
European Commission (2018a) Proposal for a directive on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the food supply chain, COM(2018) 173 final
European Commission (2018b) Proposal for a regulation promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediation services, COM(2018) 238 final.
European Commission (2018c) Remarks by Commissioner Hogan at launch of an EU Code of Conduct on Agricultural Data, Brussels. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/hogan/announcements/remarks-commissioner-hogan-launch-eu-code-conduct-agricultural-data-brussels_en. Accessed July 2018
European Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment (2018) Initiative to improve the food supply chain (unfair trading practices). SWD(2018) 92 final. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=SWD:2018:092:FIN. Accessed July 2018
Falkowski J, Ménard C, Sexton R, Swinnen J, Vandevelde S, Di Marcantonio F, Ciaian P (2017) Unfair trading practices in the food supply chain: A literature review on methodologies, impacts and regulatory aspects (study commissioned by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre). Available at www.ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/unfair-trading-practices-food-supply-chain-literature-review-methodologies-impacts-and-regulatory. Accessed July 2018
Ferris JL (2017) Data Privacy and Protection in the Agriculture Industry: Is Federal Regulation Necessary? Minnesota Journal of Law Science & Technology 18:309–342
Gebbers R, Adamchuk V (2010) Precision Agriculture and Food Security. Science 327:828–831
IPES-Food (2017) Too big to feed: Exploring the impacts of mega-mergers, consolidation and concentration of power in the agri-food sector. Available at www.ipes-food.org/images/Reports/Concentration_FullReport.pdf. Accessed July 2018
Johnson J (2012) Precision Agriculture: Higher Profit, Lower Cost. Available at www.precisionag.com/institute/precision-agriculture-higher-profit-lower-cost/. Accessed July 2018
Keulemans W (2015) Food Production and Food Security: The Incomplete Truth. Available at www.kuleuven.be/metaforum/docs/pdf/wg_33_e.pdf. Accessed July 2018
Khan L (2013) Monsanto’s scary new scheme: Why does it really want all this data? Available at www.salon.com/2013/12/29/monsantos_scary_new_scheme_why_does_it_really_want_all_this_data/. Accessed July 2018
Kritikos M (2017) Precision agriculture in Europe. Legal, social and ethical considerations (study commissioned by the European Parliamentary Research Service’s Scientific Foresight Unit). Available at www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/603207/EPRS_STU(2017)603207_EN.pdf. Accessed July 2018
Lamborelle A, Fernández Álvarez L (2016) Farming 4.0: The future of agriculture? Available at www.euractiv.com/section/agriculture-food/infographic/farming-4-0-the-future-of-agriculture/. Accessed July 2018
Lianos I, Katalevsky D (2017) Merger Activity in the Factors of Production Segments of the Food Value Chain: A Critical Assessment of the Bayer/Monsanto merger. Available at www.discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10045082/1/Lianos_cles-policy-paper-1-2017.pdf. Accessed July 2018
Magnin C (2016) How big data will revolutionize the global food chain. Available at www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/how-big-data-will-revolutionize-the-global-food-chain. Accessed July 2018
McMahon J, Cardwell M (eds) (2015) Research Handbook on EU Agriculture Law. Edward Elgar
OECD (2017) Algorithms and Collusion: Competition Policy in the Digital Age. Available at www.oecd.org/competition/algorithms-collusion-competition-policy-in-the-digital-age.htm. Accessed July 2018
Olson K, Rahm M and Swanson M (2010) Market Forces and Changes in the Plant Input Supply Industry, Choices 25:6–11
Perez C (2002) Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Poppe K, Wolfert S, Verdouw C, Renwick A (2015) A European Perspective on the Economics of Big Data. Farm Policy Journal 12:11–19
Poppe K, Wolfert S, Verdouw C, Verwaart T (2013) Information and Communication Technology as a Driver for Change in Agri-food Chains. EuroChoices 12:60–65
Porter ME (1979) How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review 57:137–145
Renda A, Cafaggi F, Pelkmans J, Iamiceli, P, Correia de Brito A, Mustilli F, Bebber L (2014) Study on the legal framework covering business-to-business unfair trading practices in the retail supply chain. Final report (prepared for the European Commission, DG Internal Market), DG MARKT/2012/049/E. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/retail/docs/140711-study-utp-legal-framework_en.pdf. Accessed July 2018
Russo J (2013) Big Data & Precision Agriculture. Available at www.precisionag.com/systems-management/data/big-data-precision-agriculture. Accessed July 2018
Schepp N, Wambach A (2016) On Big Data and Its Relevance for Market Power Assessment. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 7:120–124
Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Brothers, New York
Sykuta ME (2016) Big Data in Agriculture: Property Rights, Privacy and Competition in Ag Data Services. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 19:57–74
The Hale Group and LSC International (2014) The digital transformation of row crop agriculture. Report to the Iowa AgState Group. Available at www.cals.iastate.edu/sites/default/files/misc/172832/agstate-executive-summary-15-dec-docx.pdf. Accessed July 2018
Tzounis A, Katsoulas N, Bartzanas T, Kittas C (2017) Internet of Things in agriculture, recent advances and future challenges. Biosystems Engineering 164:31–48
Van Es H, Woodard J (2017) Innovation in Agriculture and Food Systems in the Digital Age. In: Dutta S, Lanvin B, Wunsch-Vincent S (eds) Global Innovation Index 2017. Innovation Feeding the World, 10th edn. Cornell University, INSEAD/the World Intellectual Property Organization, Ithaca/Fontainebleau/Geneva, pp 97–104
Wesseler J, Bonanno A, Drabik D, Materia V, Malaguti L, Meyer M, Venus T (2015) Overview of the agricultural inputs sector in the EU (study requested by European Parliament Directorate-General for Internal Policies). Available at www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/563385/IPOL_STU(2015)563385_EN.pdf. Accessed July 2018
Wolfert S, Ge L, Verdouw C, Bogaardt M (2017) Big Data in Smart Farming – A review. Agricultural Systems 153:69–80
Wolfert S, Sørensen C, Goense D (2014) A Future Internet Collaboration Platform for Safe and Healthy Food from Farm to Fork. 2014 Annual SRII Global Conference. IEEE, San Jose (United States), pp 266–273
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 T.M.C. Asser press and the authors
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Verdonk, T. (2019). Planting the Seeds of Market Power: Digital Agriculture, Farmers’ Autonomy, and the Role of Competition Policy. In: Reins, L. (eds) Regulating New Technologies in Uncertain Times. Information Technology and Law Series, vol 32. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-279-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-279-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague
Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-278-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-279-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)