Skip to main content

Interorganizational Collaboration in Crisis and Disaster Management: The Valuable Asset of Organizational Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
NL ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2016

Part of the book series: NL ARMS ((NLARMS))

Abstract

Organizing for safety and security has become increasingly complex. A multitude of actors is involved trying to respond collaboratively to problems varying from terrorist attacks to natural or man-made disasters. Interorganizational collaborative crisis and disaster management has become an essential tool to deal with multifaceted extreme events. Despite the popularity of collaboration in theory, case research has shown that it is difficult to achieve in practice. The different organizational cultures involved in interorganizational collaboration are perceived as a severe challenge to effective collaboration. This chapter asserts that a culture-as-problem approach is an unhelpful perspective. Cultural differences provide the leverage that is to be gained from collaboration and, if managed, enhance the value of collaborative activities in the field of crisis and disaster management. Increased awareness of organizational culture as an important factor in interorganizational collaboration and a focus on culture as an asset could break an important barrier to effective interorganizational collaboration during crisis or disaster.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Quarantelli 1998 and Perry and Quarantelli 2005 illustrate the existence of many definitions and understandings of disaster. This chapter follows the definition of Von Brainich Felth 2004. He perceives a crisis as a situation in which a vital interest is threatened and normal measures are inadequate to respond to the threat. In this understanding, a disaster is a crisis only on the terrain of the public or physical safety. This entails that disaster management is a part of crisis management, Scholtens 2008, p. 17.

  2. 2.

    Wisner et al. 2012.

  3. 3.

    Scholtens 2007; Kapucu et al. 2010.

  4. 4.

    Kapucu et al. 2010.

  5. 5.

    Van Twist 2000 uses this term to describe a word that has become so popular in policy debates that the use of it can count on uncritical acceptance among managers.

  6. 6.

    Scholtens 2007.

  7. 7.

    Scholtens 2008.

  8. 8.

    Thomson et al. 2009, p. 25.

  9. 9.

    See also Ring and van de Ven 1994; Gray 2000; Huxham and Vangen 2005.

  10. 10.

    Thomson et al. 2009, p. 23.

  11. 11.

    Thomson and Perry 2006, p. 21.

  12. 12.

    The extensive literature on collaboration is without agreement on terms but there seems to be agreement that collaboration requires collective action on a higher level than cooperation or coordination (Thomson and Perry 2006; Alexander 1995) Most scholars agree that cooperation and collaboration are different in terms of their depth of interaction, integration, commitment, and complexity. In research and practice, coordination and collaboration have been used interchangeably.

  13. 13.

    Thomson and Perry 2006.

  14. 14.

    Thomson and Perry 2006; Thomson et al. 2009.

  15. 15.

    Schein 2004.

  16. 16.

    Ibid, p. 26.

  17. 17.

    Barney 1986.

  18. 18.

    Granot 1999.

  19. 19.

    Huxham 1996, p. 4.

  20. 20.

    Huxham 1996, p. 4.

  21. 21.

    Huxham 1996, p. 4.

  22. 22.

    Long et al. 2013.

  23. 23.

    Gray 1989, p. 5 in Thomson et al. 2009, p. 25.

  24. 24.

    Jackson 1996.

  25. 25.

    Scholtens 2007; Scholtens 2008.

  26. 26.

    Kapucu et al. 2010, p. 19.

  27. 27.

    Eide et al. 2012.

  28. 28.

    Huxham 1996.

  29. 29.

    Leukfeldt et al. 2007 in Scholtens 2008, p. 200.

  30. 30.

    Scholtens 2008.

  31. 31.

    Scholtens, p. 200.

  32. 32.

    Scholtens 2008 for an overview of evaluations.

  33. 33.

    Scholtens 2008.

  34. 34.

    Scholtens, p. 202.

  35. 35.

    Groenendaal et al. 2013.

  36. 36.

    Meyerson et al. 1996.

  37. 37.

    Waugh and Streib 2006; Moynihan 2008; Leonard and Howitt 2010; Groenendaal et al. 2013.

  38. 38.

    Janssen et al. 2010; Comfort 2007; Netten and van Someren 2011; Kapucu and Garayev 2011.

  39. 39.

    Wolbers and Boersma 2013.

  40. 40.

    Wolbers and Boersma 2013.

  41. 41.

    Wolbers and Boersma 2013 refer to this process as ‘collective sensemaking’.

  42. 42.

    Thomson and Perry 2006.

  43. 43.

    Scholtens 2008.

  44. 44.

    Scholtens 2007.

  45. 45.

    Boersma et al. 2009.

  46. 46.

    Dutch Safety Regions Act 2010.

  47. 47.

    Dutch Safety Regions Act 2010.

  48. 48.

    Thomson 2001; Thomson and Perry 2006.

  49. 49.

    Dutch Safety Regions Act 2010.

  50. 50.

    Dutch Safety Regions Act 2010, p. 37.

  51. 51.

    Comfort and Kapucu 2006; Janssen et al. 2010.

  52. 52.

    Groenendaal et al. 2013.

  53. 53.

    Scholtens 2008.

  54. 54.

    Groenendaal et al. 2013.

  55. 55.

    Scholtens 2008.

  56. 56.

    Helsloot 2015.

  57. 57.

    Thomson and Perry 2006.

  58. 58.

    Scholtens 2015.

  59. 59.

    Wolbers and Boersma 2013.

  60. 60.

    Wolbers et al. 2012.

  61. 61.

    Scholtens 2008.

  62. 62.

    Wolbers and Boersma 2013; Comfort 2007.

  63. 63.

    Thomson and Perry 2006.

  64. 64.

    Huxham 1996; Thomson and Perry 2006.

  65. 65.

    Huxham 1996; Thomson and Perry 2006.

  66. 66.

    Huxham 1996.

  67. 67.

    Scholtens 2007.

  68. 68.

    See for example Bollen 2002; Helsloot 2008.

  69. 69.

    Groenendaal et al. 2013; Scholtens 2008.

  70. 70.

    Groenendaal et al. 2013; Helsloot 2015.

  71. 71.

    Thomson and Perry 2006.

  72. 72.

    Treurniet et al. 2012.

  73. 73.

    Thomson et al. 2008.

  74. 74.

    Thomson and Perry 2006, p. 27.

  75. 75.

    Edmunds 2006.

  76. 76.

    Thomson and Perry 2006.

  77. 77.

    Ostrom 1998; Thomson and Perry 2006.

  78. 78.

    Huxham and Vangen 2005.

  79. 79.

    Ansell and Gash 2008.

  80. 80.

    Moynihan 2008.

  81. 81.

    Schein 2004.

  82. 82.

    Scholtens 2015.

References

  • Alexander ER (1995) How organizations act together: interorganizational coordination in theory and practice. Gordon and Breach Publishers, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansell C, Gash A (2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theor 18:543–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (1986) Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Acad Manag Rev 11:656–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boersma K, Groenewegen P, Wagenaar P (2009) Emergency response rooms in action: an ethnographic case-study in Amsterdam. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management ISCRAM. Gothenburg, Sweden, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen M (2002) Working apart together. Civiel-militaire samenwerking tijdens humanitaire operaties. Ph.D. dissertation Wageningen University, HAVEKA BV, Alblasserdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Comfort LK (2007) Crisis management in hindsight: cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Adm Rev 67:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort LK, Kapucu N (2006) Inter-organizational coordination in extreme events: the World Trade Center attacks, September 11, 2001. Nat Hazards 39:309–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutch Safety Regions Act (2010) https://www.government.nl/documents/decrees/2010/12/17/dutch-security-regions-act-part-i Accessed 15 March 2016

  • Edmunds T (2006) What are armed forces for? The changing nature of military roles in Europe. Int Aff 82:1059–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eide AW, Halvorsrud R, Haugstveit IM, Skjetne JH, Stiso M (2012) Key challenges in multi-agency collaboration during large-scale emergency management. In: AmI for crisis management, international joint conference on ambient intelligence, Pisa, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Granot H (1999) Emergency inter-organizational relationships. Disaster Prev Manag 8:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray B (1989) Collaborating: finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray B (2000) Assessing inter-organizational collaboration: multiple conceptions and multiple methods. In: Faulkner D, de Rond M (eds) Cooperative strategy: economic, business, and organizational issues. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 243–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendaal J, Helsloot I, Scholtens A (2013) A critical examination of the assumptions regarding centralized coordination in large-scale emergency situations. J Homel Secur Emerg Manage 10:113–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsloot I (2008) Coordination is a prerequisite for good collaboration, isn’t it? J Contingencies Crisis Manag 16:173–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helsloot I (2015) De magere opbrengst van 30 jaar continue professionalisering in de rampenbestrijding in Nederland. In: Devroe E, Duchatelet A, Ponsaers P, Easton M, Moor LG, Wondergem L (eds) Zicht op first responders: Handboek bij het beheer van evenementen en noodsituaties in Nederland en België. Maklu, Antwerpen/Apeldoorn, pp 323–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham C (1996) Collaboration and collaborative advantage. In: Huxham C (ed) Creating collaborative advantage. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham C, Vangen S (2005) Managing to collaborate: the theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson SE (1996) The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. In: West MA (ed) Handbook of work group psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 53–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen M, Lee J, Bharosa N, Cresswell A (2010) Advances in multi-agency disaster management: key elements in disaster research. Inf Syst Front 12:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu N, Garayev V (2011) Collaborative decision-making in emergency and disaster management. Int J Public Adm 34:366–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu N, Arslan T, Collins ML (2010) Examining intergovernmental and interorganizational response to catastrophic disasters: toward a network-centered approach. Adm Soc 42:222–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson D, Weick KE, Kramer RM (1996) Swift trust and temporary groups. In: Kramer RM, TR Tyler (eds) Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 166–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard HB, Howitt AM (2010) Organizing responses to extreme emergencies: the Victorian bushfires of 2009. Aust J Public Adm 69:372–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leukfeldt ER, van der Straten KWC, Stol W (2007) Ter plaatse. Alledaagse samenwerking tussen de primaire hulpverleningsdiensten. Boom Juridische Uitgevers, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Long JC, Cunningham FC, Braithwaite J (2013) Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research 13:158

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan DP (2008) Learning under uncertainty: networks in crisis management. Public Adm Rev 68:350–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netten N, van Someren M (2011) Improving communication in crisis management by evaluating the relevance of messages. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 19:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1998) A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. Am Polit Sci Rev 92:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry RW, Quarantelli EL (eds) (2005) What is a disaster? New answers to old questions. Xlibris Corporation, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli EL (1998) What is a disaster? Perspectives on the Question. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring PS, van de Ven AH (1994) Development processes of cooperative inter-organizational relationships. Acad Manag Rev 19:90–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein EH (2004) Organizational culture and leadership. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens A (2007) Samenwerking in crisisbeheersing. Overschat en onderschat. Lectorale rede. http://www.nifv.nl/upload/117924_668_1197380114765-Lectorale_rede.pdf Accessed 14 Mar 2016

  • Scholtens A (2008) Controlled Collaboration in Disaster and Crisis Management in the Netherlands, History and Practice of an Overestimated and Underestimated Concept. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 16:195–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens A (2015) Samenwerkingsstructuren bij beheer van rampen in Nederland. In: Devroe E, Duchatelet A, Ponsaers P, Easton M, Gunther Moor L, Wondergem L (eds) Zicht op first responders: Handboek bij het beheer van evenementen en noodsituaties in Nederland en België. Maklu, Antwerpen/ Apeldoorn, pp 103–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, AM (2001) Collaboration: meaning and measurement. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson AM, Perry JL (2006) Collaboration processes: inside the black box. Public Adm Rev 66:20–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson AM, Perry JL, Miller TK (2008) Linking collaboration processes and outcomes: foundations for advancing empirical theory. In: Bingham LB, O’Leary R (eds) Big ideas in collaborative public management. ME Sharpe Publishers, Armonk, New York, pp 97–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson AM, Perry JL, Miller TK (2009) Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration. J Public Adm Res Theor 19:23–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treurniet W, van Buul-Besseling K, Wolbers J (2012) Collaboration awareness—a necessity in crisis response coordination. Simon Fraser University, Vancouver Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Twist M (2001) De corrosie van het begrip corridor. Producten, projecten en processen. Berenschot Procesmanagement, Den Haag, pp 47–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Brainich Felth ET (2004) Het systeem van crisisbeheersing. Boom Juridische Uitgevers, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh WL, Streib G (2006) Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Adm Rev 66:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner B, Gaillard JC, Kelman I (eds) (2012) Handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction and management. Routledge, New York, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolbers JJ, Boersma K, de Heer J (2012) Netcentrisch werken in ontwikkeling. Een cultuuronderzoek naar multidisciplinaire samenwerking en gezamenlijke operationele beelden in de Veiligheidsregio’s. http://keesboersma.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Netcentrisch_Werken_inontwikkeling_def.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2016

  • Wolbers JJ, Boersma FK (2013) The common operational picture as collective sensemaking. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 21:186–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helena de Jong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 T.M.C. Asser press and the authors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Jong, H. (2016). Interorganizational Collaboration in Crisis and Disaster Management: The Valuable Asset of Organizational Culture. In: Beeres, R., Bakx, G., de Waard, E., Rietjens, S. (eds) NL ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2016. NL ARMS. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-135-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-135-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-134-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-135-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships