Abstract
Police work consists of (criminal) law enforcement, maintaining public order and rendering assistance to those who need it. An essential method for fulfilling these tasks is surveillance and observation. Drones, equipped with interchangeable payloads, are the next step in technological progress that can help law enforcement agencies in ways that were previously impossible. Observation by means of a drone equipped with a camera is an important, though not exclusive, focal point. This chapter has a predominantly exploratory approach: in a fictional situation where one is not limited by legal or other constraints, which practical applications could drones have for police work, now and in the foreseeable future? This chapter focuses on the different ways in which drones can “add value” to police work. Among others, the following perspectives are dealt with:
-
Static observation (crowds, objects, crime scenes) versus dynamic observation (moving vehicles, suspects)
-
Passive use of drones (different ways of gathering information, for instance drones with cameras) versus active use (influencing the public, for instance drones with features such as emitting light, sound or scent)
-
Expectations (what do the police want to use drones for) versus possibilities (what is technologically possible).
-
Examples of practical use of drones in the full spectrum of police work: (criminal) law enforcement, maintaining public order and rendering assistance to those who need it.
Roads? Where we’re going, we don’t need roads *
* Last line in the 1985 movie Back to the Future.
This chapter is written in a personal capacity. The authors want to thank Tjeerd Tiedemann and Sytse Algera (Dutch National Police) and Charlotte Nortier (staff of the Attorney-General in The Hague, “parket-generaal”) for their comments and suggestions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Bryson 2013.
- 2.
Custers and Vergouw 2015.
- 3.
In Dutch: Politiewet 2012. http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0031788/. Accessed 1 April 2016.
- 4.
See Ministry of the Interior 2009. This publication precedes the entering into effect of the Police Act 2012, but is still valid on these specific points.
- 5.
In Dutch: Gemeentewet. http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0005416/. Accessed 11 April 2016.
- 6.
In Dutch: Wetboek van Strafvordering. http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0001903/. Accessed 1 April 2016.
- 7.
Ibid. 5.
- 8.
In Dutch: Algemene Beginselen van Behoorlijk Bestuur.
- 9.
Ruling of the Dutch Supreme Court of 1 July 2014. HR 1 juli 2014, ECLI:NL:HR:2014:1569. No official translation available. (“a limited violation of the peoples fundamental rights”, and “limited risks of integrity and control of law enforcement” In Dutch: “een beperkte inbreuk op grondrechten van burgers” en “niet zeer risicovol is voor de integriteit en beheersbaarheid van de opsporing”.
- 10.
- 11.
Dutch Parliamentary correspondence, TK 2015-2016, 29628, nr. 594. Documents can be found at https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/zoeken/parlementaire_documenten. Enter “29628” in the field “dossiernummer” and “594” in “ondernummer”. Accessed 1 April 2016.
- 12.
- 13.
Dutch Supreme Court of 30 January 2007, LJN: AZ2104.
- 14.
For background on this, see van Gulijk and Hardyns 2015. And for several international examples:
A Belgian example http://www.limburg-actueel.be/index.php?job=lve&id=10548#.VgO3ud-qqko. Accessed 1 April 2016. A Swedish example http://www.thelocal.se/2015/drones-tested-by-police-in-sweden. Accessed 1 April 2016. An Italian example http://www.thelocal.it/20141127/italian-police-to-use-predator-drones. Accessed 1 April 2016. An Australian example https://delimiter.com.au/2013/11/06/sa-police-buys-drone-fleet/. Accessed 1 April 2016. An American example http://www.clickorlando.com/news/Florida-police-want-to-use-drones-for-crowd-control/18433078. Accessed 1 April 2016. A Dubai example http://www.arabianbusiness.com/dubai-police-set-trial-crowd-control-drone-501430.html. Accessed 1 April 2016.
- 15.
See for a Dutch example: http://www.binnenlandsbestuur.nl/bestuur-en-organisatie/nieuws/boven-de-haagse-schilderswijk-geen-drones.9263726.lynkx. Accessed 1 April 2016. Limited flight time and high costs are mentioned as arguments against such use of drones in the city of The Hague. For English, see Lewis 2010.
- 16.
Schermer and van der Heide 2013.
- 17.
http://rt.com/news/167168-riot-control-pepper-spray-drone/, http://www.defenceweb.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=34659:desert-wolf-unveils-riot-control-drone&catid=35:Aerospace and http://webwereld.nl/beveiliging/82893-gewapende-drone-jaagt-protestmassa-uiteen. Accessed 1 April 2016. Stelmack 2015.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
Staples 2014.
- 21.
Moran 2015.
- 22.
Lawless 1991.
- 23.
- 24.
de Vos 2008.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
Whitehead 2010.
- 28.
Finn and Wright 2012.
- 29.
For a Swedish example: http://www.thelocal.se/20150302/drones-tested-by-police-in-sweden. Accessed 1 April 2016.
- 30.
Dutch Parliamentary correspondence, TK 2013–2014, 29628, nr. 459. Documents can be found at https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/zoeken/parlementaire_documenten Enter “29628” in the field “dossiernummer” and “459” in “ondernummer”. Accessed 1 April 2016.
- 31.
http://www.drones.nl/onduidelijkheid-over-gebruik-drone-bij-oprollen-wietkwekerij/. Accessed 1 April 2016.
- 32.
The canna-chopper: http://www.zideo.nl/playzideo/6c596d566e465a74. Accessed 1 April 2016.
- 33.
Creighton 2014.
- 34.
Hull 2010.
- 35.
Farber 2014.
- 36.
Heath 2015.
- 37.
- 38.
The request was based on the Dutch equivalent of the Freedom of Information Act, the Wet openbaarheid van bestuur (Wob). https://www.politie.nl/binaries/content/assets/politie/wob/00-korpsstaf/onbemande-vliegtuigen/2013---besluit-uav-gelderland-midden.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2016.
- 39.
http://www.binnenlandsbestuur.nl/bestuur-en-organisatie/nieuws/gemeenten-limburg-willen-drones-inzetten-tegen.9439460.lynkx. Accessed 1 April 2016. Other countries also provide examples of this type of drone use, see, for instance, McNaughton 2013.
- 40.
Finn and Wright 2012.
- 41.
For this subject, we refer to Custers, Oerlemans and Vergouw 2015.
- 42.
Beake 2015.
- 43.
- 44.
https://rejo.zenger.nl/inzicht/defensie-drones-zoeken-naar-vermiste-schaatser/. Accessed 1 April 2016.
- 45.
Puri 2013.
- 46.
Muller et al. 2009.
- 47.
http://rt.com/usa/darpa-aging-drones-wifi-hotspots-952/. Accessed 1 April 2016.
- 48.
Match interrupted by drone with Albanian flag: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJSQf737Agw, Gallagher (2013), and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKV6g47hgRs. Accessed 1 April 2016.
- 49.
https://www.thehaguesecuritydelta.com/news/newsitem/194. Accessed 1 April 2016.
References
Beake N (2015) London Airport Police to Use Surveillance Drones. BBC http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-32431630. Accessed 11 April 2016
Bryson B (2013) One summer: America, 1927. Doubleday, New York
Creighton S (2014) Thieves using heat-detecting £60 drones bought from supermarkets to spot cannabis farms—then break in to steal the drugs. Mail Online, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2606972/Thieves-using-heat-detecting-60-drones-bought-supermarkets-spot-cannabis-farms-break-steal-drugs.html. Accessed 11 April 2016
Custers BHM, Vergouw B (2015) Promising policing technologies: experiences, obstacles and police needs regarding law enforcement technologies. Comput Law Secur Rev 31:2015
Custers BHM, Oerlemans JJ, Vergouw SJ (2015) Het gebruik van drones. Een verkennend onderzoek naar onbemande luchtvaartuigen. WODC. https://www.wodc.nl/onderzoeksdatabase/2518-gebruik-van-drones.aspx?nav=ra&l=geografisch_gebied&l=europa. Accessed 11 April 2016
de Vos C (2008) Psychodynamic process in aromatherapy. Int J Clin Aromather 5(1):35. http://www.zeszintuigen.nl/documents/psychodynamics.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2016
den Hengst M, ter Mors J (2012) Community of intelligence, the secret behind intelligence led policing. Politieacademie. https://www.politieacademie.nl/kennisenonderzoek/Lectoraten/lectointelligence/Documents/PID2397493.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2016
Dölle AHM, Elzinga DJ (2004) Handboek van het Nederlandse gemeenterecht. Kluwer, Deventer, p 389
Farber HB (2014) Eyes in the sky: constitutional and regulatory approaches to domestic drone deployment. Syracuse Law Rev 64(1). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2350421. Accessed 11 April 2016
Finn RL, Wright D (2012) Unmanned aircraft systems: surveillance, ethics and privacy in civil applications. Comput Law Secur Rev 28:184–194
Gallagher S (2013) German chancellors drone attack shows the threat of weaponized UAV’s. ARS technica. http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/09/german-chancellors-drone-attack-shows-the-threat-of-weaponized-uavs/. Accessed 11 April 2016
Heath B (2015) New police radars can ‘see’ inside homes. USA Today. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/01/19/police-radar-see-through-walls/22007615/. Accessed 11 April 2016
Hennekens HPhJAM (2007) Openbare orde recht. Kluwer, Deventer
Hull L (2010) Drone makes first UK ‘arrest’ as police catch car thief hiding under bushes. Mail Online, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250177/police-make-arrest-using-unmanned-drone.html. Accessed 11 April 2016
Lawless H (1991) Effects of odors on mood and behavior. In: Laing DG et al (eds) The human sense of smell (Chapter 17). Springer, Heidelberg
Lewis P (2010) CCTV in the sky: police plan to use military-style spy drones. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/jan/23/cctv-sky-police-plan-drones. Accessed 11 April 2016
McNaughton G (2013) Halton police finds $744k worth of drugs using hight-tec pot-spotting drones. National Post. http://news.nationalpost.com/posted-toronto/halton-police-find-744k-worth-of-drugs-using-high-tech-pot-spotting-drones. Accessed 11 April 2016
Ministry of the Interior (2009) Policing in The Netherlands. https://www.government.nl/documents/leaflets/2009/01/01/policing-in-the-netherlands. Accessed 11 April 2016
Moran J (2015) Armed police drones: we need to keep careful watch of these eyes in the sky. http://phys.org/news/2015-09-armed-police-droneswe-eyes-sky.html. Accessed 11 April 2016
Muller ER, Rosenthal U, Zannoni M, Ferwerda H, Schaap SD (2009) Strandrellen Hoek van Holland. COT Instituut voor Veiligheids- en Crisismanagement & Bureau Beke, 8 Dec 2009, pp 89–90. http://www.burgemeesters.nl/files/File/Crisisbeheersing/docs/20090822.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2016
Oude Egberink R, Van Raaij D (2013) Informatiegestuurd politiewerk. https://www.politieacademie.nl/onderwijs/canonggp/planmatigenmethodischwerken/Paginas/Informatiegestuurd-politiewerk.aspx. Accessed 11 April 2016
Puri A (2013) A survey of unmanned aerial vehicles 9UAV for traffic surveillance. http://www.ugpti.org/smartse/research/citations/downloads/Puri-A_Survey_of_Unmanned_Aerial_Vehicles_for_Traffic_Surveillance-2005.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2016
Sarkar M (2015) http://edition.cnn.com/2015/04/09/asia/india-police-drones/. Accessed 11 April 2016
Schermer B, van der Heide M (2013). Privacyrechtelijke aspecten van drones, Nederlands Juristen Blad, 5-7-2013, afl. 27, pp 1773–1779
Staples WG (2014) Everyday surveillance: vigilance and visibility in postmodern life, 2nd edn. Rowman and Littlefield, Kansas
Stelmack K (2015) Weaponized police drones and their effect on police use of force. http://tlp.law.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/tlp/article/view/172. Accessed 11 April 2016
Tak PJP (2008) The Dutch criminal justice system. https://www.wodc.nl/onderzoeksdatabase/ov-200801-the-dutch-criminal-justice-system.aspx. Accessed 11 April 2016
van Gulijk C, Hardyns W (2015). De steile opmars van drones en de uitdagingen voor de politie. Cahier politiestudies, 33, ISSN 1784-5300
Whitehead JW (2010) Drones over America, Tyranny at Home. http://www.prisonplanet.com/drones-over-america-tyranny-at-home.html. Accessed 11 April 2016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 T.M.C. Asser press and the authors
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Engberts, B., Gillissen, E. (2016). Policing from Above: Drone Use by the Police. In: Custers, B. (eds) The Future of Drone Use. Information Technology and Law Series, vol 27. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-132-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-132-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague
Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-131-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-132-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)