Skip to main content

Policing from Above: Drone Use by the Police

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Drone Use

Part of the book series: Information Technology and Law Series ((ITLS,volume 27))

Abstract

Police work consists of (criminal) law enforcement, maintaining public order and rendering assistance to those who need it. An essential method for fulfilling these tasks is surveillance and observation. Drones, equipped with interchangeable payloads, are the next step in technological progress that can help law enforcement agencies in ways that were previously impossible. Observation by means of a drone equipped with a camera is an important, though not exclusive, focal point. This chapter has a predominantly exploratory approach: in a fictional situation where one is not limited by legal or other constraints, which practical applications could drones have for police work, now and in the foreseeable future? This chapter focuses on the different ways in which drones can “add value” to police work. Among others, the following perspectives are dealt with:

  • Static observation (crowds, objects, crime scenes) versus dynamic observation (moving vehicles, suspects)

  • Passive use of drones (different ways of gathering information, for instance drones with cameras) versus active use (influencing the public, for instance drones with features such as emitting light, sound or scent)

  • Expectations (what do the police want to use drones for) versus possibilities (what is technologically possible).

  • Examples of practical use of drones in the full spectrum of police work: (criminal) law enforcement, maintaining public order and rendering assistance to those who need it.

Roads? Where we’re going, we don’t need roads *

* Last line in the 1985 movie Back to the Future.

This chapter is written in a personal capacity. The authors want to thank Tjeerd Tiedemann and Sytse Algera (Dutch National Police) and Charlotte Nortier (staff of the Attorney-General in The Hague, “parket-generaal”) for their comments and suggestions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bryson 2013.

  2. 2.

    Custers and Vergouw 2015.

  3. 3.

    In Dutch: Politiewet 2012. http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0031788/. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  4. 4.

    See Ministry of the Interior 2009. This publication precedes the entering into effect of the Police Act 2012, but is still valid on these specific points.

  5. 5.

    In Dutch: Gemeentewet. http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0005416/. Accessed 11 April 2016.

  6. 6.

    In Dutch: Wetboek van Strafvordering. http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0001903/. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  7. 7.

    Ibid. 5.

  8. 8.

    In Dutch: Algemene Beginselen van Behoorlijk Bestuur.

  9. 9.

    Ruling of the Dutch Supreme Court of 1 July 2014. HR 1 juli 2014, ECLI:NL:HR:2014:1569. No official translation available. (“a limited violation of the peoples fundamental rights”, and “limited risks of integrity and control of law enforcement” In Dutch: “een beperkte inbreuk op grondrechten van burgers” en “niet zeer risicovol is voor de integriteit en beheersbaarheid van de opsporing”.

  10. 10.

    den Hengst and ter Mors 2012; Oude Egberink and Van Raaij 2013.

  11. 11.

    Dutch Parliamentary correspondence, TK 2015-2016, 29628, nr. 594. Documents can be found at https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/zoeken/parlementaire_documenten. Enter “29628” in the field “dossiernummer” and “594” in “ondernummer”. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  12. 12.

    For Dutch readers: note from Langemeijer to the decision of the Supreme Court of the Netherlands of 19 January 1962. HR 19 January 1962, NJ 107, p. 423 (Geertruidenberg). See also Hennekens 2007; Dölle and Elzinga 2004. For some background on this subject, see Ministry of the Interior 2009, p. 20.

  13. 13.

    Dutch Supreme Court of 30 January 2007, LJN: AZ2104.

  14. 14.

    For background on this, see van Gulijk and Hardyns 2015. And for several international examples:

    A Belgian example http://www.limburg-actueel.be/index.php?job=lve&id=10548#.VgO3ud-qqko. Accessed 1 April 2016. A Swedish example http://www.thelocal.se/2015/drones-tested-by-police-in-sweden. Accessed 1 April 2016. An Italian example http://www.thelocal.it/20141127/italian-police-to-use-predator-drones. Accessed 1 April 2016. An Australian example https://delimiter.com.au/2013/11/06/sa-police-buys-drone-fleet/. Accessed 1 April 2016. An American example http://www.clickorlando.com/news/Florida-police-want-to-use-drones-for-crowd-control/18433078. Accessed 1 April 2016. A Dubai example http://www.arabianbusiness.com/dubai-police-set-trial-crowd-control-drone-501430.html. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  15. 15.

    See for a Dutch example: http://www.binnenlandsbestuur.nl/bestuur-en-organisatie/nieuws/boven-de-haagse-schilderswijk-geen-drones.9263726.lynkx. Accessed 1 April 2016. Limited flight time and high costs are mentioned as arguments against such use of drones in the city of The Hague. For English, see Lewis 2010.

  16. 16.

    Schermer and van der Heide 2013.

  17. 17.

    http://rt.com/news/167168-riot-control-pepper-spray-drone/, http://www.defenceweb.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=34659:desert-wolf-unveils-riot-control-drone&catid=35:Aerospace and http://webwereld.nl/beveiliging/82893-gewapende-drone-jaagt-protestmassa-uiteen. Accessed 1 April 2016. Stelmack 2015.

  18. 18.

    See also: http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-news-from-elsewhere-32202466 and http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/Now-drones-to-be-used-to-disperse-mobs-in-Lucknow/articleshow/46794530.cms. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  19. 19.

    Whitehead 2010; Stelmack 2015.

  20. 20.

    Staples 2014.

  21. 21.

    Moran 2015.

  22. 22.

    Lawless 1991.

  23. 23.

    http://www.rijnmond.nl/nieuws/19-02-2008/rotterdam-kalmeert-arrestanten-met-sinaasappelgeur and http://www.volkskrant.nl/binnenland/sinaasappellucht-maakt-arrestant-kalm-en-schoon~a885847/. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  24. 24.

    de Vos 2008.

  25. 25.

    http://www.de-escalate.nl, https://atos.net/content/dam/global/case-study/atos-case-study-city-of-eindhoven.pdf and http://www.brainport.nl/high-tech-systems-materials/living-lab-laat-ander-licht-schijnen-op-stratumseind. Accessed 1 April 2016. Sarkar 2015.

  26. 26.

    http://www.ed.nl/regio/eindhoven/minder-vechten-door-sinaasappelgeur-op-stratumseind-in-eindhoven-1.4612871. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  27. 27.

    Whitehead 2010.

  28. 28.

    Finn and Wright 2012.

  29. 29.

    For a Swedish example: http://www.thelocal.se/20150302/drones-tested-by-police-in-sweden. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  30. 30.

    Dutch Parliamentary correspondence, TK 2013–2014, 29628, nr. 459. Documents can be found at https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/zoeken/parlementaire_documenten Enter “29628” in the field “dossiernummer” and “459” in “ondernummer”. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  31. 31.

    http://www.drones.nl/onduidelijkheid-over-gebruik-drone-bij-oprollen-wietkwekerij/. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  32. 32.

    The canna-chopper: http://www.zideo.nl/playzideo/6c596d566e465a74. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  33. 33.

    Creighton 2014.

  34. 34.

    Hull 2010.

  35. 35.

    Farber 2014.

  36. 36.

    Heath 2015.

  37. 37.

    http://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2013/05/09/bevestiging-na-kamervragen-nederlandse-drone-politie-bijna-een-feit/. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  38. 38.

    The request was based on the Dutch equivalent of the Freedom of Information Act, the Wet openbaarheid van bestuur (Wob). https://www.politie.nl/binaries/content/assets/politie/wob/00-korpsstaf/onbemande-vliegtuigen/2013---besluit-uav-gelderland-midden.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  39. 39.

    http://www.binnenlandsbestuur.nl/bestuur-en-organisatie/nieuws/gemeenten-limburg-willen-drones-inzetten-tegen.9439460.lynkx. Accessed 1 April 2016. Other countries also provide examples of this type of drone use, see, for instance, McNaughton 2013.

  40. 40.

    Finn and Wright 2012.

  41. 41.

    For this subject, we refer to Custers, Oerlemans and Vergouw 2015.

  42. 42.

    Beake 2015.

  43. 43.

    http://www.nbc15.com/home/headlines/Fitchburg-Police-looking-for-a-missing-82-year-old-man-267433271.html. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  44. 44.

    https://rejo.zenger.nl/inzicht/defensie-drones-zoeken-naar-vermiste-schaatser/. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  45. 45.

    Puri 2013.

  46. 46.

    Muller et al. 2009.

  47. 47.

    http://rt.com/usa/darpa-aging-drones-wifi-hotspots-952/. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  48. 48.

    Match interrupted by drone with Albanian flag: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJSQf737Agw, Gallagher (2013), and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKV6g47hgRs. Accessed 1 April 2016.

  49. 49.

    https://www.thehaguesecuritydelta.com/news/newsitem/194. Accessed 1 April 2016.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bart Engberts .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 T.M.C. Asser press and the authors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Engberts, B., Gillissen, E. (2016). Policing from Above: Drone Use by the Police. In: Custers, B. (eds) The Future of Drone Use. Information Technology and Law Series, vol 27. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-132-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-132-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-131-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-132-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships