Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to present a methodological approach to map unequal quality-of-life and citizen’s self-perceived living conditions. The objective is to critically explore new approaches where the combination of multiple sources of information collected via mixed methods offers new insights at the same time as raises new challenges. This chapter draws from various case studies carried out in the global South and North. All the cases made use of adjustments of our framework that combines measures of objective and subjective quality-of-life in a mixed method approach. Although the cases are located in cities of different countries, the results show the emergence of similar questions and concerns related to the construction, use and validity of the collected information and poses new questions about what knowledge can be derived from it. The results also show the policy relevance of mapping and explaining self-perceived quality-of-life conditions for targeting and implementing remedy policies.
The identification of context sensitive life domains and relevant data sources requires the combination of different forms of knowledge from local governments, but also from citizens and other actors, especially from civil societies. Compared to quantitative approaches, mixed methods and Qualitative Geographic Information Systems in particular offer new insights in quality-of-life inquiries by capturing unmonitored conditions and explaining reasons behind citizen’s self-perceived conditions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
If the information is georeferenced, created, assembled and disseminated by a harnessing of ICT tool, it is usually conceptualized as Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) (see McCall et al. 2015).
- 2.
- 3.
For more details about emic/etic significance, see Harris (1976).
- 4.
Rojas (2015, p. 320) describes presumption and imputation as follows “The presumption tradition postulates that wellbeing is something that people experiences, but it keeps the authority to assess a person’s wellbeing situation in the hands of third-persons. The imputation tradition is based on the idea of a third party – usually assumed as a thoughtful person or institution providing criteria to judge a person’s life”.
- 5.
This relates to some epistemological questions we mentioned earlier in the chapter. How do we know what is “good” and “bad”? In our research, we used a relative perspective (e.g. city average) as threshold (there is no predefined absolute threshold).
- 6.
Adapted from Ndungu (2012) Applicability of volunteered geographic information in assessing quality-of-life: case from Zanzibar. Enschede, University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation ITC, 2012.
- 7.
In another study (Shumi et al. 2014), we used this mixed-method approach and elicited emic views to understand how the quality of life of women garment workers in Dhaka (Bangladesh) was affected by the walking conditions of the routes the take from home to work.
- 8.
Adapted from Kumar Dashora (2009) Visualisation of urban quality-of-life at neighbourhood level in Enschede. Enschede, ITC, 2009.
References
Berhe, R., Martínez, J. A., & Verplanke, J. (2014). Adaptation and dissonance in quality of life: A case study in mekelle, Ethiopia. Social Indicators Research, 118(2), 535–554.
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chambers, R. (2006). Participatory mapping and geographic information systems: Whose map? Who is empowered and who disempowered? Who gains and who loses? EJISDC, 25, 1–11.
Cope, M., & Elwood, S. (2009). Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Corbett, J. M., Rambaldi, G., Kyem, P., Weiner, D., Olson, R., Muchemi, J., et al. (2006). Overview: Mapping for change – The emergence of a new practice. Participatory Learning and Action, 54, 3–6.
Crampton, J., & Krygier, J. (2005). An introduction to critical cartography. ACME, 4(1), 11–33.
Damer, S., & Hague, C. (1971). Public participation in planning: A review. The Town Planning Review, 42, 217–232.
Elwood, S. (2006). Critical issues in participatory GIS: Deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions. Transactions in GIS, 10, 693–708.
Evans, J., & Jones, P. (2011). The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place. Applied Geography, 31(2), 849–858.
Feldman, M. S., & Khademian, A. M. (2007). The role of the public manager in inclusion: Creating communities of participation. Governance-An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 20(2), 305–324.
Harris, M. (1976). History and significance of the emic/etic distinction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 5, 329–350.
Hawthorne, T. (2005). Participatory GIS for growth management in the cheat lake planning district of monongalia county. West Virginia: West Virginia University.
Khaef, S. (2013). Perception of quality of life through a gendered lens: A case from the city of Birmingham. Enschede: University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation (ITC).
Knigge, L., & Cope, M. (2006). Grounded visualization: Integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization. Environment & Planning A, 38(11), 2021–2037.
Knigge, L., & Cope, M. (2009). Grounded visualization and scale: a recursive analysis of community spaces. In M. Cope, & S. Elwood (Eds.), Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach (pp. 95–114). Thousand Oaks.
Kumar Dashora, L. (2009). Visualisation of urban quality of life at neighborhood level in Enschede. Enschede: ITC.
Kwan, M. P., & Ding, G. X. (2008). Geo-narrative: Extending geographic information systems for narrative analysis in qualitative and mixed-method research. Professional Geographer, 60(4), 443–465.
Lee, S., Kim, Y., & Phillips, R. (2015). Exploring the intersection of community well-being and community development. In S.J. Lee, Y. Kim, R. Phillips (Eds.), Community well-being and community development (Springer Briefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research, pp. 1–7). Springer International Publishing.
Loney, M. (1983). Community against government. The British community development project 1968–1978: A study of government incompetence.
Lukubwe, S. M. (2013). Participatory geographic information system (PGIS) in urban land use planning (ULUP): A case study of Tsandi settlement, Omusati region, Northern Namibia, Africa.
Martínez, J. A. (2009). The use of GIS and indicators to monitor intra-urban inequalities. A case study in Rosario, Argentina. Habitat International, 33(4), 387–396.
Martínez, J. A., Pfeffer, K., & van Dijk, T. (2011). E-government tools, claimed potentials/unnamed limitations. Environment and Urbanization Asia, 2(2), 223–234.
McCall, M. K. (2004). Can participatory-GIS strengthen local-level spatial planning? Suggestions for better practice. Skudai, Johor.
McCall, M. K., & Dunn, C. E. (2012). Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’ governance? Geoforum, 43, 81–94.
McCall, M. K., Martínez, J., & Verplanke, J.J. (2015). Shifting boundaries of volunteered geographic information systems and modalities: Learning from PGIS. ACME: An international e – journal for critical geographies, 14(3), 791–826.
McCrea, R., Shyy, T.-K., & Stimson, R. (2006). What is the strength of the link between objective and subjective indicators of urban quality of life? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(1), 79–96.
Mikkelsen, C., & Di Nucci, J. (2015). Qualitative methodologies in geography, contributions to the study of quality of life. In G. Tonon (Ed.), Qualitative studies in quality of life (Social Indicators Research Series, Vol. 55, pp. 63–95). Springer International Publishing.
Miscione, G., Pfeffer, K., Martínez, J., & De’, R. (2013, September 12–14). Openness may not mean democratization – e-Grievance Systems in their Consequences. In Proceedings of the joint conference GISDECO and N-AERUS, Enschede, Netherlands.
Myers, M. D., & Avison, D. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21(2), 241–242.
Ndungu, W. (2012). Applicability of volunteered geographic information in assessing subjective quality of life: Case from Zanzibar. Enschede: University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation (ITC).
Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28.
Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing—A social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 19–30.
Rojas, M. (2015). Poverty and people’s wellbeing. In W. Glatzer, L. Camfield, V. Møller, & M. Rojas (Eds.), Global handbook of quality of life (International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life, pp. 317–350). Dordrecht: Springer.
Seik, F. T. (2000). Subjective assessment of urban quality of life in Singapore (1997–1998) [Proceedings Paper]. Habitat International, 24(1), 31–49.
Shumi, S., Zuidgeest, M. H. P., Martínez, J. A., Efroymson, D., & van Maarseveen, M. F. A. M. (2014). Understanding the relationship between walkability and quality-of-life of women garment workers in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1–25.
Sirgy, M. J., Michalos, A. C., Ferriss, A. L., Easterlin, R. A., Patrick, D., & Pavot, W. (2006). The quality-of-life (QOL) research movement: Past, present, and future. Social Indicators Research, 76(3), 343–466.
Smith, D. M. (1994). Geography and social justice. Oxford: Blackwell.
Soja, E. (2010). Seeking spatial justice (Globalization and community series, Vol. 16). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed models designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 671–701). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Tesfazghi, E., Martínez, J., & Verplanke, J. (2010). Variability of quality of life at small scales: Addis Ababa, Kirkos sub-city. Social Indicators Research, 98(1), 73–88.
Tönnies, F. (1988). Community & society. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
Tonon, G. (2015). Integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in quality of life studies. In G. Tonon (Ed.), Qualitative studies in quality of life (Social Indicators Research Series, Vol. 55, pp. 53–60). Springer International Publishing.
Tulloch, D. L. (2008). Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games. GeoJournal, 72, 161–171.
Watson, V. (2014). Co-production and collaboration in planning – The difference. Planning Theory and Practice, 15(1), 62–76.
Webster, C. J. (1993). Gis and the scientific inputs to urban-planning 1. Description. Environment & Planning B- Planning & Design, 20(6), 709–728.
Woldetinsaye, S. G. (2011). Analyzing variation of urban quality of life using participatory approach in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A case study of Kirkos sub – city. Enschede: University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation ITC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martinez, J., Verplanke, J., Miscione, G. (2017). A Geographic and Mixed Methods Approach to Capture Unequal Quality-of-Life Conditions. In: Phillips, R., Wong, C. (eds) Handbook of Community Well-Being Research. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0878-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0878-2_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-0876-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-0878-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)