Abstract
The collection of rules of conduct applicable to natives and foreign orientals — which are ‘adat’ on account of their uncodified state, and ‘law’ because they carry sanctions — has not been derived from a single source. As with the languages and ethnic groupings, the influence of history is noticeable. Against the Malayo-Polynesian background of the indigenous languages, Sanskrit, Arabic, Portuguese and Dutch words and usages appeared as the result of the arrival of Indian, then Moslem, and finally European, foreigners. Against the Malayo-Polynesian background of indigenous beliefs and customs the imprint of Hindu, Moslem and Christian shapes and shades became visible. Likewise, the languages and customs of the Chinese and Arabs in the Indies were subject to non-Chinese and non-Arabic influences. It was no different with the adat law of these peoples. Here, too, the indigenous Malayo-Polynesian law is still the background of the adat law of the Indonesians, whether autochthones like the Batak, Dayak, and Toraja, or immigrants like the members of the Malayan race. But among the 34 million-odd Indonesians of to-day (—) only a minority estimated at less than 3 million has remained pagan, adhering to an animistic-fetishistic religion (Badui, Tenggerese, many Batak, the inhabitants of the interior of Borneo and Celebes, the people of New Guinea, the Baliaga in Bali, etc.).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Mayne speaks of the ‘Dutch Government’.
According to Dr Kern this means ‘popular usage’, i.e. adat, and the more accurate spelling should have been Tesawalamei. It should also be noted that, although Mayne claims to possess an 1862 edition of this law-book by H. F. Mutukisna, none of the papers in the Government Archives at The Hague, relating to Ceylon, contains any reference to such a codification.
RNI 8(1852):83–119.
And not Haksteen (see Tamson in TBG 39, (1897):511–15).
In 1706; Plakaatboek VII:392–407.
Plakaatboek XIV:93–94, 154; cf. Nederburgh (1904):411, 413, 414–18, 420–22.
See the Hazeu edition, VBG 55, II, 1905:119–123.
Printed as an Annex to the Reports from Committees of the House of Commons, 1772–73, vol. IV, a written copy of which exists among the manuscripts of the University Library in Leiden.
See: Jolly, ‘Recht und Sitte’, in Bühler’s Grundriss der Indo-Arischen Philologie und Altertumskunde; Steele, The Law and Custom of Hindoo Castes within the Dekhum Provinces, 1868; Tupper et al., Punjab Customary law, 1881; Mayne, Hindu Law and Usage, (5th ed.) 1892; Kohler, in Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft, 7–11, 1887–1895; Rattigan, A Digest of Civil Law for the Punjab, 1901; etc.
RO: ss.7 & 8; ABW: s.11; etc.
cf. Keuchenius II, pp. 432, 525.
ibid, III, pp. 583, 626, 632, 682, 689, 691, 694.
cf. ISb 79/1855, s.10.
e.g. ISb 415/1902.
Snouck Hurgronje (1894):353; Er. (1876) 1:2; Van der Lith (1882):219.
Snouck Hurgronje (1893):106, 58f.
Vol. 1:182; Vol. 11:260–62.
Vol. 1:12–17, 74–75, 98–99, 358–59, 458; Vol. 11:297–308, 346–73.
No. 53 (1899): 136–39.
pp. 108, 319, 321.
Juynboll (1903:7–9, 262–63, 265/1, 310–14).
e.g. in TBG: 33(1890):330–32, 344–47, 363, 372.
in: WA Vol. I (1896–98), part. 1:17–78.
Carpentier Alting (1902) Vol. I(1):48, 56, 75, 137, 148, 149, (3):42, 53.
Bl. 1904–05, 121 No. 10, par 4, — 54.
Gunning (1905:219–20).
[So named officially, although the judge is neither a priest nor does he sit in council — Ed.]
MbZg 1904:167–68.
(Ed. Der Rinderen, 1872, e.g. 112–13, 143, 170, 179.)
ISb 1882 No. 142(j); 1883 No. 4.
See the judgment in RNI, 76(1901):75–76.
See further: Van den Berg (1895:308–12, 301–03); Enc. N.I. (1896:8, ‘Adat’); (1899:541, ‘Mohammedanisme’).
Van den Berg (1901b:l-80, cf. 1899:567; 1897:83–181; 1892:454–512; 1895: 291–314; 1896:541f.).
IWR No. 758.
Snouck Hurgronje (1893:12), (1894: ch. IV); Piepers (1895:149, 150–52); Nederburgh (1896–8:17–18); Bergsma (1896–8:205–08); Van der Lith (1882: 217ff., 221–3, 226, 238); Van Ossenbruggen (1902:113); Day (1904:28).
Verslag UZV (1905:13–14), cf. Nederburgh (1905–06:2).
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holleman, J.F. (1981). The Elements of Adat Law. In: Holleman, J.F. (eds) Van Vollenhoven on Indonesian Adat Law. Koninklijk Instituut Voor Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5878-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5878-9_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-6174-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-5878-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive