Skip to main content

Comparative Law and Law Reform by ‘Transposition’

  • Chapter
The Enigma of Comparative Law

Abstract

What is the role of comparative law and the comparative lawyer in law reform? That comparative law provides a pool of models to choose from when law reform is planned is shown to be one of the most important practical functions of comparative law. As legislatures look forward they also look sideways. The same is true of the courts. Is this a use of comparative law? Is this a proper role for comparative law? Comparative lawyers do not all agree on the answers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Sacco, ‘Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law (Installment II of II)’ (1991) 39 American Journal of Comparative Law, p. 394.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Watson, ‘Legal Transplants and Law Reform’, (1976) 92 Law Quarterly Review p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.G. Monateri, ‘The “Weak” Law: Contaminations and Legal Culture’, in Italian National Reports to the XVI International Congress of Comparative Law, Bristol 1998 (Milano, Giuffre editore, 1998 ), p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Schauer, ‘The Politics and Incentives of Legal Transplantations’ Law and Development Paper No: 2. CID Working Paper No: 44, April 2000, Center for International Development at Harvard University, http://www.cid.harvard.edu/cidwp/044.htm, p.2, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See C. Dupre, Importing the Law in Post-Communist Transitions ( Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2003 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quoted by K. Zweigert and H. Kotz, An Introduction to Comparative Law, 3rd edn., trans. T. Weir, (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998), at p 17.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Van Hoecke and F. Ost, ‘Legal doctrine in crisis: towards a European legal science’, (1998) 18 Legal Studies 197, at pp. 211–215.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A perfect example is the Turkish receptions of Swiss, German, Italian and French laws.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Oriicu, ‘Law as Transposition’, (2002) 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 205–223.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Ajani, La circulation de modeles juridiques dans le droit Post-Socialiste’ Revue internationalle de droit compare -4 (1994), 1087–1105 at p. 1087.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Berkowitz, K. Pistor and J-F. Richard, ‘Economic Development, Legality, and the Transplant Effect’, Law and Development Paper No 1, CID Working Paper No 39, March 2000, Center for International Development at Harvard University at http://www.cid.harvard.educidwp/039.pdf p.5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Grief, ‘The Pervasive Influence of European Community Law in the United Kingdom’, in T.G. Watkin (ed), The Europeanisation of Law, United Kingdom Comparative Law Series Vol: 18 ( London, UKNCCL, 1998 ), p. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Teubner, ‘Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergencies’, (1998) 61 Modern Law Review, 11, at p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Watson, ‘Aspects of reception of law’ (1996) 44 American Journal of Comparative Law p. 345.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Legrand, ‘The Impossibility of Legal Transplants’ (1998) 4 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.W.F. Allison, A Continental Distinction in the Common Law: A Historical and Comparative Perspective on English Public Law ( Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996 ), p. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.J. Ibbetson, ‘A Reply to Professor Zimmermann’, in T.G. Watkin (ed) The Europeanisation of Law, United Kingdom Comparative Law Series No: 18 (London, UKNCCL, 1998), 224 at p. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  18. X. Lewis, Europeanisationof the common law’, in R. Jagtenberg, E. Orticu and A. de Roo (eds.) Tranfrontier Mobility of Law (The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1995), 47 at p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Tamanaha, A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society (New York, Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. xi-xii. William Twining reviews this book and cites this example in this recent review article, ‘A Post-Westphalian Conception of Law’ 37 Law and Society Review (2003), 199–258.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Örücü, E. (2004). Comparative Law and Law Reform by ‘Transposition’. In: The Enigma of Comparative Law. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5596-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5596-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-04-13989-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-5596-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics