Skip to main content
  • 126 Accesses

Abstract

The goal of this research is to develop a model for problem solving that integrates general rules with specific examples. Developing such a model is important because neither rules nor examples, standing alone, are sufficient for problem solving in many important domains. Few areas of human expertise are so well understood that problem solving is reducible to deduction from general principles. Similarly, there are few domains in which experience is so extensive that every new problem precisely matches a previous problem whose solution is known. When neither rules nor examples are individually sufficient, problem-solving expertise depends on integrating both.

A rule qua rule is detached, it stands as it were alone in its glory; although what gives it importance is the facts of daily experience.

—Ludwig Wittgenstein (Wittgenstein, 1958).

General propositions do not decide concrete cases.

—Oliver Wendell Holmes (Holmes, 1906).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. The term “case-based reasoning” refers to two related but distinct problem-solving methods: reasoning with exemplars; and reuse of sequences of problem-solving operators or configurations. Legal analysis entails the first form of case-based reasoning. For a representative application of case-based reasoning for reuse of operator sequences, see (Veloso, 1992). For a discussion of a number of applications’of case-based reasoning to legal problem-solving tasks other than legal analysis, see (Ashley, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Branting, L.K. (2000). Introduction. In: Reasoning with Rules and Precedents. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2848-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2848-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5374-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2848-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics