Abstract
In this paper, an analytical theory of motion of the second Neptunian satellite Nereid is constructed using Lie transformation approach. The main perturbing forces which come from the solar influence are only taken into account. The disturbing function is developed in powers of the ratio of the semimajor axes of the satellite and the Sun and put in a closed form with respect to the eccentricity. The theory includes secular perturbations up to the fourth order, short, intermediate and long period perturbations up to the third order. The osculating orbital elements which describe the orbital motion of Nereid are evaluated analytically. The comparison with the numerical integration of the equations of motion gives an accuracy on the level of 0.2 km in the semimajor axis, 10−7 in the eccentricity and l0−4 degree in the angular variables over a period of several hundred years. The results of the present theory satisfy the required accuracy for the observations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hori, G.: 1963, ‘A new approach to the solution of the main problem of the lunar theory’, Astron. J. 68, 125–146.
Hori, G.: 1966, ‘Theory of general perturbations with unspecified canonical variables’, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 18, 287–296.
Jacobson, R. A.: 1990, ‘The orbits of the satellites of Neptune’, Astron. Astrophys. 231, 241–250.
Jacobson, R. A., Riedel, J. E. and Taylor, A. H.: 1991, ‘The orbits of Triton and Nereid from spacecraft and Earthbased observations’, Astron. Astrophys. 247, 565–575.
Kinoshita, H. and Nakai, H.: 1991, ‘Secular perturbations of fictitious satellites of Uranus’, Celest. Mech. and Dyn. Astron. 52, 293–303.
Kinoshita, H. and Nakai, H.: 1999, ‘Analytical solution of the Kozai resonance and its application’, Celest. Mech. and Dyn. Astron. 75, 125–147.
Mignard, F.: 1975, ‘Satellite with high eccentricity. Application to Nereid’, Astron. Astrophys. 43, 359–379.
Mignard, F.: 1981, ‘The mean elements of Nereid’, Astron. J. 86, 1728–1729.
Oberti, P.: 1990, ‘An accurate solution for Nereid’s motion. I. Analytic modeling’, Astron. Astrophys. 239, 381–386.
Rose, L. E.: 1974, ‘Orbit of Nereid and the mass of Neptune’, Astron. J. 79, 489–490.
Saad, A. S. and Kinoshita, H.: 1999, ‘An analytical theory on a satellite motion with highly eccentricorbit’, Proceedings of the 31st Symposium on Celestial Mechanics, Kashima, Ibaraki, Japan, March 3–5, ( H. Umehara, Ed. ), pp. 249–268.
Saad, A. S. and H. Kinoshita: 2000, ‘The Theory of Motion of Nereid. II. Non-planar Case’, Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium on Celestial Mechanics,Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan, March 15–17, (T. Fukushima, T. Ito, H. Arakida and M. Yoshimitsu, Eds.), in press.
Segerman, A. M. and Richardson, D. L.: 1997, ‘An analytical theory for the orbit of Nereid’, Celest. Mech. and Dyn. Astron. 66, 321–344.
Stone, E. C. and Miner, E. D.: 1989, ‘The Voyager 2 encounter with the Neptunian system’, Science 246, 1417–1421.
Veillet, C.: 1982, ‘Orbital elements of Nereid from new observations’, Astron. Astrophys. 112, 277–280.
Van Biesbroeck, G.: 1951, ‘The orbit of Nereid, Neptune’s second satellite’, Astron. J. 56, 110–111.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Saad, AN.S., Kinoshita, H. (2001). An Analytical Theory of Motion of Nereid. In: Pretka-Ziomek, H., Wnuk, E., Seidelmann, P.K., Richardson, D.L. (eds) Dynamics of Natural and Artificial Celestial Bodies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1327-6_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1327-6_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5865-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1327-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive