Skip to main content

Aspen Bark Photosynthesis and Its Significance to Remote Sensing and Carbon Budget Estimates in the Boreal Ecosystem

  • Conference paper
Boreal Forests and Global Change

Abstract

Aspen bark was investigated for photosynthetic function, pigment content, and spectral characteristics during the 1993–1994 Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) summer field campaigns in the boreal zone of Saskatchewan, Canada. Parameters related to photosynthetic function were similar for bark and leaves: chlorophyll (Chl) concentration; fluorescence responses; and spectral reflectance. Similar increases along a vertical gradient from base to tree top were observed for incident photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), photosynthetic pigment content, photosynthetic capacity, and spectral reflectance variables. Since transmittance of aspen bark periderm was 20–30% in the blue, and 50–60% in the red Chl absorption bands, the PAR available to the photosynthetic cortical layer in the natural, canopy environment (<1000 μmol m−2 s−1) was sufficient to support positive net assimilation (<8–10 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) under ideal conditions (e.g., light, temperature, saturating CO2), a rate approximately 30–50% that of leaves. However, the respiring tissues comprising the greater fraction of bark tissue bias the balance of CO2 exchange in favour of respiration for the whole bark. Therefore, net photosynthesis under ambient conditions on the whole bark was, in general, negative. The total bark surface area was estimated to contain 17–40% of the whole tree Chl. The contribution of the bark surface area fraction of the full canopy (leaves plus bark) increased with age (<60 years), with a similar trend expected for bark in total tree (and stand) photosynthesis. A spectral reflectance variable, the red edge inflection point (REIP), was related to total bark Chl content (r2 = 0.74). A better predictive relationship (r2 = 0.82) for total bark Chl was observed using a spectral index calculated from the reflectance ratio of two narrow wavebands (R3/R2: R2 and R3 are between 0.715–0.726 μm and 0.734–0.747 μm, respectively), which may have greater utility in landscape remote sensing. The bark spectra for Chlcontaining bark should improve understanding of carbon balance in aspen forests, based on landscape-level radiative transfer simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avery, T. E. and Burkhart, H. E.: 1983, Forest Measurements, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 331 pp. Brayman, A. and Schaedle, M.: 1982, Plant Physiol. 69, 911–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brayon, O. V.: 1973, Fluorescent Microscopy of Plant Cells and Tissues. Kiev, Russia 142 pp. [In Ukrainian.] Covington, W. W.: 1975, Ecology 56, 715–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Canada: 1993, National Forestry Database. Can. Council For. Mins., Ottawa, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, K. C. and Schaedle, M.: 1978, For. Sci. 24, 569–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, S. J. and Prince, S. D.: 1995, Remote sensing of net primary production in boreal forest stands. Agric. For. Meteorol. (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen, A.: 1954, Torrey Bot. Club B. 81, 210–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiscox, J. D. and Israelstam, G. F.: 1979, Can. J. Bot. 57 1332–1334

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, D. A.: 1940, Plant Microtechnique, New York, USA, McGraw-Hill, 523 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharouk, V. I. and Terskov, I. A.: 1982, Pigments in Tree Tissues,Nauka, Novosibirk, Russia, 88 pp. [In Russian.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, É. M., Sullivan, J. H., Chan, S. S., Boyard, B., DeLuca, A. and Cannon, T.: 15 pp. (Unpublished manuscript.)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): 1994, Boreal-Ecosystem Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) Experimental Plan, V. 3. 0 ( May), Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, L. C. and Lawrence, D. B.: 1958a, Amer. J. Bot. 45, 383–387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, L. C. and Lawrence, D. B.: 1958b, Minn. Acad. Sci. 25–26, 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perala, D. A.: 1990, In: Silvics of North America, Hardwoods. Washington D.C., USA, 2, pp. 555–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, B. N., Hoshizaki, T. and Miller, J. R.: 1988, Rem. Sensing Environ. 24, 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rock, B. N., Williams, D. L., Moss, D. M., Lauten, G. N. and Kim, M.: 1994, Rem. Sensing Environ. 47, 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanio, C.: 1860, Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 2, 39–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaedle, M. and Brayman, A.: 1986, Tree Physiol. 1, 53–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaedle, M. and Foote, K. C.: 1971, For. Sci. 17, 308–313.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. G.: 1907, Amer. Bot. 21, 327–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, P. J., Berry, J. A., Collatz, G. J., Field, C. B. and Hall, F. G.: 1992, Rem. Sensing. Environ. 42, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theisen, A. F. and Rock, B. N.: 1994, In: International Symposium on Spectral Sensing Research `94 (ISSSR), 10–15 July 1994, San Diego, USA, pp. 737–748.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kharouk, V.I., Middleton, E.M., Spencer, S.L., Rock, B.N., Williams, D.L. (1995). Aspen Bark Photosynthesis and Its Significance to Remote Sensing and Carbon Budget Estimates in the Boreal Ecosystem. In: Apps, M.J., Price, D.T., Wisniewski, J. (eds) Boreal Forests and Global Change. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0942-2_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0942-2_46

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4605-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0942-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics