Abstract
Cutting across the common distinction between learning to argue and arguing to learn, this research is concerned with arguing to learn argumentative knowledge, or broadening and deepening understanding of the space of debate. A secondary school experiment compared broadening/deepening of understanding of the space of a debate on genetically modified organisms, using either a CHAT tool, or else an argument-diagram tool (DREW: Dialogical Reasoning Educational Web tool) that was designed as a medium for interactive debate. Although there was no significant difference between the quality of students’ texts before and after debating across the conditions, a new interaction analysis method (“Rainbow”) revealed differences in students’ expression and elaboration of arguments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainsworth, S.E., Bibby, P.A., & Wood, D.J. (1999). Analysing the costs and benefits of multi-representational learning environments. In M.W. van Someren, P. Reimann, H.P.A. Boshuizen, & T. de Jong (Eds.), Learning with multiple representations (pp. 120–134). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Andriessen, J. & Coirier, P. (Eds.) (1999). Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.
Baker, M.J. (1999). Argumentation and Constructive Interaction. In J. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Eds.), Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing (pp. 179–202). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.
Baker, M.J. (2002). Argumentative interactions, discursive operations and learning to model in science. In P. Brna, M. Baker, K. Stenning & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), The Role of Communication in Learning to Model (pp. 303–324). Mahwah N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bakhtine, M. (1929/1977). Le Marxisme et la Philosophie du Langage. Paris: Minuit. [1st edition: Voloshinov, V.N., Leningrad, 1929].
de Vries, E., Lund, K. & Baker, M.J. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 63–103.
Edmondson, W. (1981). Spoken Discourse: A model for analysis. London: Longman.
Golder, C. (1996). Le développement des discours argumentatifs. Lausanne: Delachaux & Niestlé.
Nonnon, E. (1996). Activités argumentatives et élaboration de connaissances nouvelles: le dialogue comme espace d’exploration. Langue Française, 112, 67–87.
Quignard, M. & Baker, M.J. (1999). Favouring modellable computer-mediated argumentative dialogue in collaborative problem-solving situations. In S.P. Lajoie & M. Vivet (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 129–136). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Quignard, M. (in press). A Collaborative Model of Argumentation in Dyadic Problem-Solving Interactions. In F. van Eemeren et al. (Eds), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA’02). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Suthers, D. & Hundhausen, C. (2001). Learning by Constructing Collaborative Representations: An Empirical Comparison of Three Alternatives. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European Perspectives on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 577–584). Maastricht: Universiteit Maastricht Press.
Toulmin, S.E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Voss, J.F. & Means, M.L. (1991). Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation. Learning and Instruction, 1, 337–350.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baker, M.J., Quignard, M., Lund, K., Séjourné, A. (2003). Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning in the Space of Debate. In: Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., Hoppe, U. (eds) Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6321-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0195-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive