Abstract
In today’s affluent Western European societies most people take full-fledged health and social care for granted. They are free from fear of the dire poverty that was for a long time the consequence of unemployment, ill health, or old age. The adequate provision of care by the welfare state has become so self-evident for them, that it has become an idée reçue. Yet newspapers report daily on the negative effects of bottlenecks in our systems of health and social care and on health and care costs that get out of hand. With almost the same frequency, ideas and policy proposals are presented that claim to provide remedies for such malfunctioning or overspending. Some plans propose only financial solutions to the problems at hand. These plans take either of two forms; on the one hand there are those who worry chiefly about the quality of care and brush aside cost objections. They want to increase the budget for care by raising taxes and levies or, by making individual co-payments compulsory. On the other hand there are those for whom increasing costs are subject to constant concern. They want to cut costs and at the same time make efficiency improvements, so that the level of care provision can be kept at the same level or even raised. Others, neither believes in the willingness of governments and people to pay more and more for health and social care, nor do they have enough faith in substantial cost reduction in combination with efficiency improvements. They deem rationing measures necessary or propose that the sick, the disabled, and the elderly queue up in anticipation of cure and care. In the face of such plans for reconstructing the existing collective risk-sharing arrangements, full-fledged health and social care provisions are in danger of losing their self-evidence.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Bayertz, K. (ed.): 1998, Solidarität, Begriff und Problem, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
Beck, U.: 1992, Risk Society; Towards a New Modernity, Sage Publications, London.
Beck, U., A. Giddens and S. Lash: 1994, Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Bonoli, G.: 1997, ‘Classifying welfare states: a two-dimension approach,’ Journal of Social Policy, 26, 351–372.
Doreian, P. and Th. Fararo (eds.): 1998, The Problem of Solidarity. Theories and Models, Gordon & Breach/OPA, Amsterdam.
Durkheim, E.: 1964 [1893], The Division of Labor in Society, The Free Press/Collier Macmillan, New York/London.
Ferrera, M.: 1996, ‘The ‘southern model’ of welfare in social Europe,’ Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 17–37.
Giddens, A.: 1992, The Consequences of Modernity, The Polity Press, Cambridge.
Ignatieff, M.: 1990, The Needs of Strangers, Hogarth Press, London.
Leibfried, S.: 1992, ‘Towards a European welfare state? On integrating poverty regimes into the European community,’ in Z. Ferge and J.G. Kolberg (eds.), Social Policy in a changing Europe, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.
Oorschot, W. van 1997, ‘Solidair en collectief of marktgericht en selectief? Nederlanders over sociale zekerheid,’ Beleid & Maatschappij, 162–174.
Oorschot, W. van and A. Komter: 1998, ‘What is it that ties? Theoretical perspectives on social bond,’ Sociale Wetenschappen, 41; 5–24.
Parsons, T.: 1951, The Social System, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Philipsen, H. and F.C.J. Stevens: 1997, ‘Modernization, rationality and continuity of care: Theoretical concepts and empirical findings,’ Sociological Focus, 1, 189–204.
Schuyt, K.: 1998, ‘The sharing of risks and the risks of sharing: solidarity and social justice in the welfare state,’ Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 1, 297–311.
Simmel, G.: 1908, Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Form der Vergesellschaftung, Von Duncker und Humblot, Leipzig.
Simmel, G.: 1964, The Sociology of Georg Simmel, K.H. Wolff (ed.), The Free Press/Collier Macmillan, New York/London.
Smith, A.: 1976 [1759], The Theory of Moral Sentiments, A.L. Macfie and D.D. Raphael (eds. ), Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Streeck, W. and P.C. Schmitter: 1985, ‘Community, Market, State — and Associations?,’ European Sociological Review, 1, 119–138.
Svallfors, S. and P. Taylor-Gooby (eds.): 1999, The End of the Welfare State? Responses to state retrenchment, Routledge/ESA Studies in European Society, London.
Swaan, A. de: 1988, In Care of the State, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Weber, M.: 1964 [1922], The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (trans. A.M. Henderson and T. Parsons), The Free Press/Collier Macmillan, New York/London.
Zijderveld, A.C.: 1999, The Waning of the Welfare State. The End of Comprehensive State Succor, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick and London.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arts, W., Verburg, R. (2001). Modernisation, Solidarity and Care in Europe the Sociologist’s Tale. In: ter Meulen, R., Arts, W., Muffels, R. (eds) Solidarity in Health and Social Care in Europe. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 69. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9743-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9743-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5887-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9743-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive