Abstract
In this paper I revisit some of the old debates concerning incommensurability, rationality and relativism, and argue that no relativistic or irrationalistic conclusions can be legitimately drawn from the ur-arguments concerning incommensurability. I then consider incommensurability understood more broadly than it is usually understood in philosophy of science, as involving not two or more incomparable scientific theories, but rather fundamentally divergent cultures or world views. I relate this broad understanding of incommensurability to contemporary interest in multiculturalism, and consider its ramifications for a subject that philosophers of science unfortunately tend to ignore: that of science education. Attending to science education, I urge, allows us to see from a new angle what is at stake in our philosophical musings concerning incommensurability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chang, R., ed. (1997a). Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Chang, R. (1997b). “Introduction.” In R. Chang, ed., 1997, pp. 1–34.
Coburn, W. and C. Loving. (2000). “Defining ‘Science’ in a Multicultural World: Implications for Science Education.” Science Education (in press).
Harding, S. (1998). Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies: Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hodson, D. (1993). “In Search of a Rationale for Multicultural Science Education.” Science Education 77: 685–711.
Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1993). Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science, trans. A. Levine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kawagley, A., D. Norris-Tull and R. Norris-Tull. (1998). “The Indigenous Worldview of Yupiaq Culture: Its Scientific Nature and Relevance to the Practice and Teaching of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35: 133–144.
Kitcher, P. (1984). “Good Science, Bad Science, Dreadful Science, and Pseudoscience.” Journal of College Science Teaching 14: 168–173.
Koertge, N. (1981). “Methodology, Ideology and Feminist Critiques of Science.” In P. Asquith and R. Giere, eds., PSA 1980: Proceedings of the 1980 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Volume 2, pp. 346–359, East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.
Kordig, C. (1971). The Justification of Scientific Change. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. (1976). “Theory-Change as Structure-Change: Comments on the Sneed Formalism.” Erkenntnis 10: 179–199.
Matthews, M. (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge.
Newton-Smith, W. (1981). The Rationality of Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ruse, M., ed., (1988). But Is It Science? The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.
Sankey, H. (1997). Rationality, Relativism and Incommensurability. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Scheffler, I. (1967). Science and Subjectivity. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Second edition Indianapolis: Hackett, 1982.
Shapere, D. (1964). “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.” Philosophical Review 73: 383–394.
Siegel, H. (1987). Relativism Refuted: A Critique of Contemporary Epistemological Relativism. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Siegel, H. (1988). Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking, and Education. New York: Routledge.
Siegel, H. (1997a). Rationality Redeemed?: Further Dialogues on an Educational Ideal. New York: Routledge.
Siegel, H. (1997b). “Science Education: Multicultural and Universal.” Interchange 28: 97–108.
Siegel, H. (1999a). “Argument Quality and Cultural Difference.” Argumentation 13: 183–201.
Siegel, H. (1999b). “Multiculturalism and the Possibility of Transcultural Educational and Philosophical Ideals.” Philosophy 74: 387–409.
Siegel, H. (in press). “Relativism.” In I. Niiniluoto, M. Sintonen and J. Wolenski, eds., Handbook of Epistemology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Siegel, H. (in progress). “Multiculturalism, Universalism, and Science Education: In Search of Common Ground.”
Snively, G. and J. Corsiglia. (2000). “Rediscovering Indigenous Science: Implications for Science Education.” Science Education (in press).
Stanley, W. and N. Brickhouse. (1994). “Multiculturalism, Universalism, and Science Education.” Science Education 78: 387–398.
Stanley, W. and N. Brickhouse. (2000). “Teaching Sciences: The Multicultural Question Revisited.” Science Education (in press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Siegel, H. (2001). Incommensurability, Rationality and Relativism: In Science, Culture and Science Education. In: Hoyningen-Huene, P., Sankey, H. (eds) Incommensurability and Related Matters. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 216. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9680-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9680-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5709-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9680-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive