Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surgery

  • Chapter
A Classified Bibliography of the History of Dutch Medicine 1900–1974

  • 102 Accesses

Abstract

Just as in other countries, till the eighteenth century most surgeons were barber-surgeons. Only relatively lately has surgery became a separate and independent profession. At the end of the Middle Ages and in the beginning of the new era surgeons were often gathered in the same guild with such craftsmen as shoemakers or carpenters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

A. General

  1. Korteweg, J. A. (1907). De ontwikkeling der Heelkunde gedurende de laatste halve eeuw (The development of surgery during the last half century). NTG, 51, I, 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koch, C. F. A. (1924). De heelkunde van 1849 (Surgery in 1849). NTG, 68, II, 21–4; BGG, IV, 144-7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deelman, H. T. (ed.) (1925). Surgery: a hundred years ago. Extracts from the Diary of Dr C. B. Tilanus, afterwards Professor of Surgery at the University of Amsterdam Edited by —, Professor of Pathology at the University of Groningen. Translated from the Dutch by Joseph Bles. 156 pp., Geoffrey Bles, London. reviewed by G. C. Delprat: NTG, 70 (1926), I, 43-5; BGG, VI, 17-9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lanz, Otto (1925). De oorlogswinst der heelkunde (The wargain of surgery). Amsterdam. 8°;. Rectorial address.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wittebol, Paul (1971). Het denken van de heelmeester (The thinking of the surgeon). 16 pp., 1 ill. F. van Rossen, Amsterdam. Inaugural address University of Utrecht, October 4, 1971; with a picture of a master-diploma of a surgeon’s pupil.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rogge, C. W. L. (1967). Sanguis et Ecclesia. Ned. T. Med. Stud., febr., 7 pp., 3 ill.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moulin, D. de (1960). Praehistorische chirurgie (Prehistoric surgery). GeWiNa, no. 8, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fériz, Hans [1964, 1965]. Schedelchirurgie in het oude Peru (Skull surgery in ancient Peru). Organorama, I, no I, 18–21; ibid., II. (1965), 18-23, ill. See also 2216a, 2737-41 (Medieval medicine), 3943, 4583-4632 (Guilds), 5003-4 (Local medicine.)

    Google Scholar 

B. Cutting for the stone

  1. Geyl, A. (1911). Enkele mededeelingen en opmerkingen over de twee oudste methoden van steensnijding (Some information and remarks on the two oldest methods of cutting for the stone). NTG, 55, I, 280–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avalon, J. (1922). Une auto-opération au XVIIe siècle. Bull. Soc. Fr. Hist. Méd., XVI, 309–11, ill. on Jan de Dood-see N. Tulp (1652). Observationes Medicae book IV, Observ. 31. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lint, J. G. de (1928). Comment Jan de Doot, forgeron, s’opéra d’un calcul de la vessie. Aesculape, 18, 50–3, 4 ill; See also 3295

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weijde, A. J. van der (1924). Iets over steensnijding en steensnijders (Something on lithotomy and lithotomists). NTG, 68, II, 655–66; BGG, IV, 191-202, 6 ports.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Staveren, C. van (1934). “Aentekeningen omtrent operatiën van den Steen”; (“Notices on operations for the stone”;). Thesis Amsterdam (Supervisor: M. W. Woerdeman). 127 pp., 8 ill. Van Gorcum, Assen.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fournier, M. (1974). Van de steen gesneden (Cutting for the stone). Spiegel Historiael, 9, 80–7. 12 ill. Also published as Med. Rijksmuseum Gesch. Natuurwtsch., no 146, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ven, A. J. van de (1935). Een steensnijding in 1653 (Stone-cutting in 1653). NTG, 79, III, 3300–7; BGG, XV, 145-52.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ven, A. J.(1935). Een steensnijding in 1653. II. Medische adviezen. (Stonecutting in 1653. II. Medical advices). NTG, 79, III, 3750–60; BGG, XV, 174-84.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moulin, D. de (1971). Cutting for the stone in the early Middle Ages. BHM, XLV, 76–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Geist-Hofman, A. M. (1969). In twee reizen (In two stages). Arts en Auto, 35, 1561–3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Woudstra, D. (1970). Als de roep van een vreemde vogel… (As the call of a rare bird…). Arts en Auto, 36, 214. a note on Camper’s proposal to perform the operation for the stone in the bladder in two stages.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sermes, J. (1726, 1943). Aanmerkingen over de twee manieren van steensnijden van de heren J. J. Rau en J. Douglas (Comments on the two methods of Lithotomy of Mr and Mr). With English translation. Opusc., XVII, 218–55.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Denys, J. (1730, 1943). Op hoe veelerhande wyzen den steen uit de blaaze wordt gehaald (On the various manners in which the stone is removed from the bladder). With English translation. Opusc., XVII, 256–89.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Francken, J. H. (1733, 1943). Over het steensnyden, zo boven als onder het schaambeen (On the Excision of stones, both above and below the pubic bone). With English translation. Opusc., XVII, 290–345.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zuiden, D. S. van (1916). Een contract tusschen steensnijders (1694). (A contract between lithotomists (1694)). NTG, 60, II, 1422. See also 66-70 (J. de Beaulieu), 483, 2778, 3388-91, 5490.

    Google Scholar 

C. Fractures and amputations

  1. Geyl, A. (1911). De ontdekking van de breuk van den hals van het dijbeen door den Amsterdamschen chirurgijn Borst in 1680 (The discovery of the fracture of the neck of the femur by the Amsterdam surgeon — in 1680). NTG, 55, II, 1613–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kate, W. ten (1937). Langdurige invaliditeit tengevolge van onderbeenbreuk (Uit de notulen van de Staten van Overijssel) (Lasting invalidity caused by a fracture of the leg. (From the minutes of the States of O.)) NTG, 81, II, 1965; BGG, XVII, 95.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kulsdom, M. E. (1954). Fractuurbehandeling door een chirurgijn in het begin der achttiende eeuw (Roelof Roukema te Leeuwarden) (Treatment of a fracture by a surgeon in the beginning of the 18th century (R. R., at L.)). NTG, 98, I, 29–34; BGG, XXXIV, 3-8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Loon, L. van (1935). De geschiedenis der hardwordende verbanden bij fractuurbehandelingen (History of plaster of Paris bandages in the treatment of fractures). NTG, 79, IV, 5163–4; BGG, XV, 226-7. included in a report of a meeting of the “Genootschap”;.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Loon, L.(1935). Historisch overzicht van de fractuurbehandeling der lange pijpbeenderen (Historical survey of the treatment of the fractures of the long bones). Thesis Leiden (Supervisor: W. F. Suermondt). 205 pp., ill. Zomer en Keuning, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jonas, A. F. (1956). The history of plaster of Paris bandages. Surg, gynec. Obstet., 102, 249–52. Also on A. Mathijsen (with port.). See also 1239-55 (A. Mathijsen).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weijde, A. J. van der (1923). Het afzetten van een been in 1652 (The amputation of a leg in 1652). NTG, 67, II, 905; BGG, III, 220. Resolution of the Utrecht City Fathers on a proposed amputation of the leg of a woman of 29 years.

    Google Scholar 

D. Wounds

  1. Eykel, R. N. M. (1911). Eenige grepen uit de geschiedenis der wondbehandeling (Analecta from the history of the treatment of wounds). Med. Rev., XI, 311 and 371.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Veraart, B. A. G. (1925). Over antisepsis als eisch voor aseptisch wondbeloop (On antisepsis as a demand for aseptic woundhealing). Thesis University of Amsterdam. H. J. Koersen, Amsterdam. Reviewed by J. G. de Lint: NTG, 69 (1925), II, 2110-2; BGG, V, 279-81; and by T. Bijleveld: NTG, 69, II, 1607-8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Croes, Felix (1940). Schotwonden in de 16e eeuw (Shot-wounds in the 16th century). Thesis University of Amsterdam (Supervisor: G. van Rijnberk). 140 pp., facs. Holdert & Co, Amsterdam. Facsimile of the chapter on Shot-wounds in Vigo’s Chirurgia, Roma 1513. See also 2706, 5414

    Google Scholar 

E. Ligature

  1. Prins, K. (1900). De ligatuur vóór A. Paré (The ligature before—). NTG, 35, II, 797. A protest against this article was published as a pamphlet by H. F. A. Peypers: De ligatuur voor A. Paré (Protest tegen de ten name van Dr K. Prins staande kritischehistorische bijdrage.) This pamphlet was added to the NTG; a copy is bound up in Janus, 1901 (copy of the U.B. Amsterdam, nr: G.T. 435).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moulin, D. de (1955-56). Historical notes on vascular surgery: I. Vascular suture and lateral ligation in the pre-antiseptic era. Arch, chir. néerl., 7, 218–26. II. Development of vascular suture in the 19th century, after the introduction of antisepsis. Ibid., 321-30. III. Development and applications during the first fifteen years of the twentieth century. Ibid., 8, (1956), 31-42.

    Google Scholar 

F. Special operations

  1. Penning, C. P. J. (1929). Waarneming over een intussusceptio intestinorum, of de inkokering, van den eenen darm in den anderen, door dr. J. van der Hout, te Haarlem (Observation of an intussusceptio intestinorum, or invagination of one gut into another by, at H.). NTG, 73, I, 2177–80; BGG, IX, 127-30.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hermans, A. G. J. (1963). Aambeien, fistels, bistouri royal (Hemorrhoids, fistulas, bistoury royal). NTG, 107, I, 965; BGG, XLIII, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beyerman, J. J. (1966). Operatie van een doofstom meisje van 17 jaar in 1827 (Operation of a deaf and dumb girl of 17 years in 1827). Numaga, 13, 46. The operation was performed by Dr E. André of Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balen Blanken, G. C. van (1924). Een stuk uit de oude doos van West-Friesland (operatie van hazenmond) (An ancient report from West-Friesland (operation of a hare-lip)). NTG, 68, II, 2257; BGG, IV, 294. report; certificate of a successful operation for hare-lip.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoeven, J. van der (1925). Een hazelip-operatie in het begin der 19de eeuw (An operation for a hare-lip in the beginning of the 19th century). NTG, 69, I, 44–51; BGG, V, 16-23, 3 ill.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dooren, L. (1936). Een medisch wonderkind in 1648 (A medical child prodigy). GG, 14, 1146. on the operation of a hare-lip at Schiedam by a 16 year old surgeon: Mr Johannes Schrader.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rhijn Jr, W. P. van (1918-19). Merkwaardige operatieve geneeswijze in 1627 (Remarkable operative cure in 1627). Med. Wbl., 25, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lint, J. G. de (1930). De Pruysiaansche messenslikker (The Prussian knife-swallower). NTG, 74, II, 3442–7; BGG, X, 196-201, 3 ill.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lint, J. G. (1930). La taille stomacale en 1635, d’un paysan, qui avait avalé son couteau. Aesculape, 20, 223–6, 4 ill.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rooseboom, M. and J. J. P. Zaaijer (1942). Van den Prussiaenschen mes-inslicker (On the Prussian knife-swallower). NTG, 86, I, 568–70; BGG, XXII, 32-4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Artelt, Walter (1969). Die Operation des preuszischen Messerschlukkers und ihre Folgen. Mediz. Hist. J., 4, 231–49.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roegholt, M. N. (1966). Niertransplantatie in 1908 (Transplantation of a kidney in 1908). NTG, 110, 1877; cf: NTG, 110, 2006. On an auto-transplantation of a kidney of a dog into the left groin by Prof. Zaayer. The dog died in 1917 at a normal age. From the autopsy a notarial act was made.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kolff, W. J. (1965). First clinical experience with the artificial kidney. Ann. Int. Med., 62, 608–19. See also 1421.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

G. Surgical instruments

  1. Lint, J. G. de (1927). Instrumentafbeelding in handschriften van Guy de Chauliac (Pictures of instruments in the manuscripts of — —). NTG, 71, I, 724–49; BGG, VII, 117-42, ill.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lint, J. G.(1927). Representations in the Utrecht Manuscript of Guy de Chauliac of Instruments for the Reduction of the Uvula. Ann. Med. Hist., ser. I, IX, 408–10. See also 506

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klaauw, C. J. van der (1939). Het eertijds verplichte instrumentarium van den heelmeester (The former obligatory cabinet of instruments of the surgeon). NTG, 83, III, 3343–53; BGG, XIX, 179-89, ill.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Daniëls, C. E. (1908). Bijdrage tot de geschiedenis van den catheter (Contribution to the history of the catheter). NTG, 52, I, 1251. Quotation from: J. B. van Helmont. Dageraad ofte Nieuwe Opkomst der Geneeskonst, Amstelod., 1660).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moonen, W. A. (1969). Iets over de geschiedenis van de catheter (Something on the history of the catheter). NTG, 113, 1201. cf: NTG, 113 (1969), 1401, letter to the editor by G. A. Lindeboom.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Haneveld, G. T. (1964). Uit de geschiedenis van het tourniquet (From the history of the “tourniquet”;). Ned. MGT, 17, 63–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eijde, A. J. van der (1927). Iets over kunsthanden, instrumenten voor bultenaars en bulten (Something on artificial hands, instruments for hunchbacks and hunches). NTG, 71, II, 661–3; BGG, VII, 570-2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Swane, J. A. W. (1962). Het instrumentarium van den chirurgijn (The cabinet of instruments of the surgeon). Brabants Heem, 14, 153. Description of surgical instruments (1680), from a document of the municipal records of Eindhoven.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Müller, I. und E. Püschel (1973). Die “Sanitätskiste”;, Cista militaris oder “Feldkast”; des Wilhelm Fabry aus Hilden (1560-1634). Dtsch. Apoth. Ztg., 113, 147–9; 171-6; 339-42., ill. on the contents of a field-surgeon’s box, as seen by Fabry, during his journey to Holland, in the army of Count Maurice of Nassau (1567-1625). See also 1560, 2677

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

H. Surgeons (general)

  1. Knappert, L. (1905). Chirurgijns en barbiers (Surgeons and barbers). Leids Jbk., II, 56.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Geyl, A. (1911). Iets over veldscheerders (Something on barbersurgeons). NTG, 55, II, 1235–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Enklaar, D. Th. (1924). Van zwervende dichters en reizende meesters (From wandering poets and travelling masters]. Groot Nederland, I, 612–41. Reviewed by M. A. van Andel: NTG, 68 (1924), II, 74-6; BGG, II, 210-2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P[utto], J. A. (1935). Dokters en chirurgijns te velde in vroegere jaren (Physicians and barber-surgeons in former years). GG, 13, 1077–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roekel, G. van (1940). De Chirurgijns: Helpers der menschheid in vroeger tijd (Surgeons: helpers of mankind in former times). NTG, 84, IV, 4298–9; BGG, XX, 182-3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andel, M. A. van (1941). Chirurgijns, Vrije Meesters, Beunhazen en kwakzalvers. De chirurgijnsgilden en de practijk der heelkunde (1400-1800). (Surgeons, Free Masters, Bunglers and Quacks. The guilds of surgeons and the practice of surgery). 193 pp., ill. Van Kampen & Zn., Amsterdam. 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roetemeijer, H. J. M. (1973). De chirurgijns te land en ter zee (Surgeons by land and sea). Unieschakel (Periodical of the “Nederlandsche Scheepvaart Unie”;), no 8, 12–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. [Roetemeijer, H. J. M.] (1916). De Heelmeesters in Stad en Lande in de 18e eeuw (The surgeons in “Town and Country”; in the 18th century). Groningen, I, 250–2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bik, J. G. W. F. (1962). De getekende dagen der chirurgijns (The marked days of the surgeons). Jbk. Dodonaea, 30, 544–57.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bik, J. G. W. F. (1964). De getekende dagen der chirurgijns (The marked days of the surgeons). NTG, 108, I, 21–7; BGG, XLIV, 3-10. letter to the editor (with the same title) by A. G. J. Hermans: NTG, 108, 1496; BGG, XLIV, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hellinga, G. (1927). De gasthuischirurgijns en de algemeene wijkvergadering (The hospital surgeons and the general district-meeting). NTG, 71, II, 2730–3; BGG, VII, 701-4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hellinga, G. (1926). Een en ander over de positie der 17e en 18e eeuwsche gasthuis-chirurgijns in Amsterdam (Something on the position of the hospital surgeons in the 17th and 18th century at A.). NTG, 70, II, 30–41; BGG, VI, 145-56.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kalff, S. (1914). Amsterdamsche chirurgijns (Amsterdam surgeons). Telegraaf, 25 januari, and foll.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vles, A. B. van der (1918). De Amsterdamsche Chirurgijns (Heelmeesters) van 1730-1829 (The Amsterdam Surgeons from — —). Ned. Leeuw, XXXVI, 276, 320 and 353.

    Google Scholar 

  15. [Anonym] (1961). Middeleeuwse Chirurgen (Medieval surgeons). Periodiek, 16, 161–5.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roosbroeck, R. van (1968). Zestiende eeuwse Chirurgen aan het werk (Sixteenth century surgeons at work). Periodiek, 23, 64–70; 92-9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bitter, H. (1914). Stadsoperateurs en steensnijders in de 17de en 18de eeuw te Haarlem (Town-surgeons en lithotomists at H. in the 17th and 18th century). NTG, 58, II, 568–76

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andel, M. A. van (1919). De heelmeester in de 18de eeuw (The surgeon in the 18th century). NTG, 63, II, 1663–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hallema, A. (1954). Hoe een halfbakken chirurgijn in 1801 te Breda werd geweerd (How a “half-baked”; surgeon was refused admittance at B.). NTG, 98, I, 710–2; BGG, XXXIV, 31-3.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kulsdom, M. E. van (1955). De Landschapsmedici en operateurs van Friesland in de 18e eeuw. Lijkschouwen aan het Hof (The regional physicians and surgeons of F. in the 18th century. Coroners at Court). NTG, 99, II, 1582–91; BGG, XXXV, 42-51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Putto, J. A. (1936). Keur en ordonnantie tot maintien van den chirurgijn en van de vroedvrouw van Esselicherwoude. In dato 26 September 1729. Bij den hove van Holland geaggreëert en geapprobeert den 2en November 1729 (Charter and ordinance maintaining the surgeon and the midwife of E. Dated 26 September 1729. At the Court of Holland aggregated and approbated 2nd November 1729). GG, 14, 1128–30.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bolt, M. (1918). Een vrouwelijke chirurg in de 17e eeuw (A female surgeon from the 17th century). NTG, 62, I, 1312–5

    Google Scholar 

  23. Veen, S. J. van (1915). Chirurgijn-Vleeschhouwer (1636). (A surgeonbutcher). Gelre, XVIII, 84.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Daniëls, C. E. [1913]. Een dominé-operateur in de zeventiende eeuw en nog iets (A reverend-surgeon in the 17th century and something else). Populair wetenschappelijk Nederland, no 7, ill.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Andel, M. A. van (1919). Een chirurgijn-kermisreiziger (A surgeonshowman). NTG, 63, II, 1016–20.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bakker, C. (1922). Drie chirurgijns, tevens schout en gerechtsbode (Three surgeons, at the same time sheriff and usher). NTG, 66, I, 1284–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pinkhof, H. (1931). Koninklijke bejegening van een chirurgijn (Royal treatment of a surgeon). NTG, 75, I, 1163; BGG, XI, 92.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Braat, P. (1938). Verbod aan chirurgijn een tapperij te houden (Prohibition to a surgeon to keep a gin-shop). NTG, 82, II, 2295; BGG, XVIII, 96.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bijl, W. F. Th. van der (1930). Zondagsrust in vroeger tijden (Sundayrest in former times). NTG, 74, II, 3917; BGG, X, 235. Resolution of the surgeons of Veere that on Sunday the barbers should not shave.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Weijde, A. J. van der (1924). Eed voor een heelmeester in 1811 (Oath for a surgeon in 1811). NTG, 68, II, 1258; BGG, IV, 221.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hallema, A. (1962). Een gewantrouwde chirurgijn in 1577. De gewonde vader van Mr Johan van Oldenbarnevelt eiste vrije artsenkeuze (A distrusted surgeon in 1577. The wounded father of— — required free choice of physicians). NTG, 106, I, 484–5; BGG, XLII, 16-7.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Breen, J. C. (1920). Een barbierswinkel in 1669 (A barbershop in 1669). Jbk. Amstelodamum, XVIII, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Emeis Jr, M. G. (1972). Pruikebollen-Chirurgijns (Wig-blocks-Surgeons). Ons Amsterdam, 24, 66–70, 6 ill.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Radbill, S. X. (1936). The barber surgeons among the early Dutch and Swedes along the Delaware. Bull. Inst. Hist. Med., IV, 718–43, 6 ill.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wittop Koning, D. A. (1956). Scheerbekkens met opschriften (Barber’s basins with inscriptions). Bijdr. Med. Rijksmuseum Volkenkunde, 21, 18–9. See also 2468, 4633.21, 5440-3 (Museums), further: Medieval medicine, Local medicine, Medical profession.

    Google Scholar 

Hangman

  1. Bitter, H. (1914). De beul te Haarlem als chirurgijn in de 17de en 18de eeuw (The hangman as a surgeon in the 17th and 18th century at H.). Maandbl. t.d. Kwakz., afl. 3, 5 and 9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fokker, A. A. (1870). De scherprechter-ledenverzetter (The executioner-setter of limbs). NTG, 6, II, 177.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zuiden, D. S. van (1917). Scherprechter chirurgijn (The executioner surgeon). NTG, 61, II, 1436.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andel, M. A. van (1932). De chirurgijn in dienst der justitie (The surgeon in service of the judicature). NTG, 76, II, 2224–8; BGG, XII, 90-4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andel, M. A.(1936). Beul en geneeskunde (Hangman and medicine). NRC, 1 november.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Witt Huberts, F. de [no d.]. De beul en zijn werk (The hangman and his work). 222 pp., ill. Andr. Blitz, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Andel, M. A. van (1925). Onze collega de beul (Our colleague the hangman). NTG, 69, II, 2100–8; BGG, V, 269-77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medicine in the Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Dr G. A. Lindeboom (Emeritus Professor)

Authors
  1. Dr G. A. Lindeboom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miss A. A. G. Ham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lindeboom, G.A., Ham, A.A.G. (1975). Surgery. In: A Classified Bibliography of the History of Dutch Medicine 1900–1974. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8780-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8780-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8153-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-8780-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation