Skip to main content

Abstract

In certain regions of the body the integument becomes invaginated and greatly hardened, forming rigid processes which serve for the attachment of muscles and the support of certain other organs. This internal framework is termed the endoskeleton and its individual parts are known as apodemes or phragmata. They arise as invaginations of the body-wall between adjacent sclerites, or at the edge of a sclerite or segment. In some insects the invaginations remain open throughout life but, more usually, they become completely solid through the deposition of cuticular material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature on the Endoskeleton

  • HUDSON, G. B. (1945–51), Studies in the comparative anatomy and systematic importance of the Hexapod tentorium, I–IV, J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr., 8, 71–90

    Google Scholar 

  • HUDSON, G. B. (1945–51), Studies in the comparative anatomy and systematic importance of the Hexapod tentorium, I–IV, J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr., 9, 99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • HUDSON, G. B. (1945–51), Studies in the comparative anatomy and systematic importance of the Hexapod tentorium, I–IV, J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr., 11, 37–49

    Google Scholar 

  • HUDSON, G. B. (1945–51), Studies in the comparative anatomy and systematic importance of the Hexapod tentorium, I–IV, J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr., 14, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • MANTON, S. M. (1964), Mandibular mechanisms and the evolution of Arthropoda, Phil. Trans. R. Soc, Ser. B, 247, 1–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SHARPLIN, J. (1965), Replacement of the tentorium of Periplaneta americana Linnaeus during ecdysis, Can. Ent., 97, 947–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SNODGRASS, R. E. (1935), Principles of Insect Morphology, McGraw-Hill, New York, 667 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • SNODGRASS, R. E. (1951), Comparative Studies on the Head of Mandibulate Arthropods, Comstock Publ. Co., Ithaca, N.Y., 118 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 O. W. Richards and R. G. Davies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richards, O.W., Davies, R.G. (1977). The Endoskeleton. In: IMMS’ General Textbook of Entomology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6514-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6514-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-15210-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-6514-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics