Skip to main content

Environmental Bonds: A Critical Assessment

  • Chapter
Sustainability: Dynamics and Uncertainty

Abstract

This paper aims to clarify the meaning, or meanings, and the applicability of the environmental bond (from now on e-bond), an interesting instrument of environmental risk control recently advocated by Perrings and Costanza.1 The e-bond is a compulsory deposit which must be paid by anyone who wants to utilize certain natural resources the disposal of which is potentially polluting or, more in general, who wants to undertake an activity which may damage the environment. The amount of the deposit is conceived as a function of the possible environmental consequences of the relevant activity: according to the prevailing opinion it should cover the maximum potential damage to the environment so that society is insured against any possible damage produced by the activity. The deposit is refundable, in whole or in part, to the extent that the holder of the bond is able to prove to the environmental agency managing the e-bond scheme that she was able to avoid the anticipated environmental damage. The deposits paid are kept in an interest-earning escrow account which may be partially utilized, provided the social insurance role of the fund is not jeopardized, by the agency in order to pay the management costs of the e-bond schemes and to encourage research and innovations meant to reduce environmental risks.

Though this paper was jointly written by the authors, Loredana Torsello takes responsibility for Sections 1, and 2, and Alessandro Vercelli for Sections 3, 4, and 5. We would like to thank Charles Perrings for helpful comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basili, M. and A. Vercelli (1997). “Environmental Option Values: A Survey”, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baumol, W. and W. Oates (1979). Economics,Environmental Policy and Quality of Life,Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baumol, W. and W. Oates (1988). The Theory of Environmental Policy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Bohm, P. (1981). Deposit-Refund Systems, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bohm, P. and C. S. Russel (1985). “Comparative Analysis of Alternative Policy Instruments”, in Handbook of Natural Resources and Energy Economics,A. V. Kneese and J. L. Sweeney (eds.), New York, North-Holland, pp. 395–455.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Costanza, R. (1991). `Assuring Sustainability of Ecological Economic System, inEcological Economics, R. Costanza (ed.), New York, Columbia University Press, pp. 331–343.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Costanza, R. (1992). “Three Things We Can Do to Achieve Sustainability”, Paper presented to the Second Conference of the ISEE, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Costanza, R. and C. Perrings (1990). “A Flexible Assurance Bonding System for Improved Environmental Management”, Ecological Economics 2, 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cropper, M. and W. Oates (1992). “Environmental Economics: A Survey”, Journal of Economic Literature 30, 675–740.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Farber, S. (1991). “Regulatory Schemes and Self-Protective Environmental Risk Control: A Comparison of Insurance Liability and Deposit/Refund System”, Ecological Economics 3, 231–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heal, G. (1991). “Risk Management and Global Change”, Paper presented at the first Nordic Conference on the Greenhouse Effect in Copenhagen, September 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huppes, G. (1988). “New Instruments for Environmental Policy: A Perspective”, International Journal of Social Economics 15(3/4), 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kelsay, D. and J. Quiggin (1992). “Theories of Choice under Ignorance and Uncertainty”, Journal of Economic Surveys 6(2), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mäler, K. G. (1974). Environmental Economics: A Theoretical Inquiry, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mills, E. S. (1972). Urban Economics,Glenview, Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Montesano, A. (1991). “Measures of Risk Aversion with Expected and Nonexpected Utility”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4, 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Montesano, A. (1992). “Non-Additive Probabilities and the Measure of Uncertainty and Risk Aversion”, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Perrings, C. (1987). Economy and Environment,Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Perrings, C. (1989). “Environmental Bonds and Environmental Research in Innovative Activity”, Ecological Economics 1, 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Perrings, C. (1991). “Reserved Rationality and the Precautionary Principle: Technological Change, Time and Uncertainty in Environmental Decision Making”, in Ecological Economics, R. Costanza (ed.), New York, Columbia University Press, pp. 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shogren, J. F., J. A. Herriges and R. Govindasamy (1993). “Limits to Environmental Bonds”, Ecological Economics 8, 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Solow, R. M. (1971). “The Economist’s Approach to Pollution Control”, Science 173, 498–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Swierzbinski, J. E. (1994). “Guilty until Proven Innocent - Regulation with Costly and Limited Enforcement”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27, 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vercelli, A. (1997). “Hard Uncertainty and Environmental Policy”, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xepapadeas, A. P. (1991). “Environmental Policy under Imperfect Information: Incentive and Moral Hazard”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20, 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Graciela Chichilnisky Geoffrey Heal Alessandro Vercelli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Torsello, L., Vercelli, A. (1998). Environmental Bonds: A Critical Assessment. In: Chichilnisky, G., Heal, G., Vercelli, A. (eds) Sustainability: Dynamics and Uncertainty. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Series on Economics, Energy and Environment, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4892-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4892-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6051-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4892-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics