Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services ((EEHS,volume 46))

Abstract

In every aspect of human resource development (HRD), the concept of return on investment (ROI) is being explored, tested, discussed, or debated. On almost every conference agenda, the ROI issue is there. In workshops and general sessions, participants turn out in record numbers to find out how to measure ROI. Workshops on measuring ROI in training and development have been conducted in diverse settings and locations ranging from deep in the jungles of Indonesia to New York City, the world’s financial center. In training and HRD professional journals, the ROI issue commands top print space, including an occasional cover story. Hundreds of organizations are pursuing the ROI issue in a deliberate and determined way and are reporting excellent results (Phillips, 1994). Even top executives are now seeking a measurable return on their training investment. One business school magazine prepared a special issue on the topic and sent it to all of the USA Fortune 500 CEO’s (Phillips, 1995).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altizer, C. (1994). Increasing your training ROI: Tying training to performance management for improved performance. Performance & Instruction. 33(3), 30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alliger, G., & Janak, E. (1989). Kirkpatrick’s levels of training criteria: Thirty years later. Personnel Psychology. 42(3), 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biech, E. (1994). TOM for Trainine. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleech, J.M., & Mutchler, D.G. (1994). Let’s get results, not excuses! Grand Rapids, MI: MBP Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, P., & Kitson, B. (1994). Evaluating training against business criteria. Journal of European Industrial Training. 18(1). 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broad, M. L., & Newstrom, J. W. (1992). Transfer of training. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidove, E. A. (1993). Evaluating the return on investment of training. Performance & Instruction. 32(1). 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, N. M. (1990). The relationship between trainee responses on participant reaction forms and posttest scores. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 1(2), 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzenz, J. (1994). Yes … You can weigh training’s value. Training. 31(7), 54–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geber, B. (1995). Does training make a difference? Prove it! Training. 32(3), 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, R., & Keller, J. M. (1994). Levels of evaluation: Beyond Kirkpatrick. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 5(4). 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerling, G. (1993). Gathering best practices. Training & Development, 47(9), 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959a). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of ASTD, 13(11), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959b). Techniques for evaluating training programs: Part 2—Learning. Journal of ASTD, 13(12), 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1960a). Techniques for evaluating training programs: Part 3—behavior. Journal of ASTD. 14(1). 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1960b). Techniques for evaluating training programs: Part 4 —Results. Journal of ASTD. 14(2), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1983, November). Four steps to measuring training effectiveness. Personnel Administrator. 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krein, T. J., & Weldon, K. C. (1994). Making a play for training evaluation. Training & Development. 48(4), 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrelli, A. F. (1993a). Cost analysis for training. Technical & Skills Training. 4(7), 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrelli, A. F. (1993b). Determining training costs, benefits, and results. Technical & Skills Training. 4(8), 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, J. L., & Larson, S. (1994). A qualitative application of Kirkpatrick’s model for evaluating workshops and conferences. Performance & Instruction. 33(8), 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. J. (ed.), (1994). In action: measuring return on investment. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. J. (1995). Measuring training’s ROI: It can be done. William and Marv Business Review. (Summer), 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. J. (1996). Was It the Training? Training & Development. 50(3), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R. T., Zahorik, A. J., & Keiningham, T. L. (1994). Return on quality: Measuring the financial impact of your company’s quest for quality. Chicago: Probus Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shandler, D. (1996). Reengineering the Training Function. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veech, A. M. (1994). Who’s on first: Management’s responsibility to the bottom line. Performance & Instruction. 33(7), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Phillips, J.J. (1998). Level Four and Beyond: An Roi Model. In: Brown, S.M., Seidner, C.J. (eds) Evaluating Corporate Training: Models and Issues. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 46. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4850-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4850-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6031-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4850-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics