Abstract
The reason I developed this four-level model was to clarify the elusive term evaluation. Some training and development professionals believe that evaluation means measuring changes in behavior that occur as a result of training programs. Others maintain that the only real evaluation lies in determining what final results occurred because of training programs. Still others think only in terms of the comment sheets that participants complete at the end of a program. Others are concerned with the learning that takes place in the classroom, as measured by increased knowledge, improved skills, and changes in attitude. And they are all right—and yet wrong, in that they fail to recognize that all four approaches are parts of what we mean by evaluating.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Knowles, M. (1986). Using Learning Contracts. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1998). The Four Levels of Evaluation. In: Brown, S.M., Seidner, C.J. (eds) Evaluating Corporate Training: Models and Issues. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 46. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4850-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4850-4_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6031-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4850-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive