Skip to main content

The Measurement of Income Inequality: The Subjective Approach

  • Chapter
Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 71))

Abstract

The research on the theory of income inequality measurement began towards the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth century. Most of that early research discussed statistical tools of measurement. One of the exceptions was the work of (1920) who discussed measurement from a social welfare point of view. The subjective approach, which is the subject of this chapter, is in fact related to this social welfare approach as is most of the more recent research on the measurement of income inequality, which began more than 25 years ago (see Atkinson 1970; Kolm, 1969; Sen, 1973).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amiel, Y. and F.A. Cowell. 1992. “Measurement of Income Inequality: Experimental Test by Questionnaire.” Journal of Public Economics 47: 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiel, Y. and F.A. Cowell. 1994a. “Inequality Changes and Income Growth.” In W. Eichhorn, ed., Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 3–26.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Amiel, Y. and F.A. Cowell. 1994b. “Income Inequality and Social Welfare.” In J. Greedy, ed., Taxation, Poverty and Income Distribution. Edward Elgar, pp. 193–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiel, Y. and F.A. Cowell. 1995, “Income Transformation and Income Inequality.” Discussion paper. STICERD, London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiel, Y. and F.A. Cowell. 1996. “Distributional Orderings and the Transfer Principle: A Re-examination.” Discussion paper, STICERD, London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiel, Y. and F.A. Cowell. 1997. “The Measurement of Poverty: An Experimental Questionnaire Investigation.” Empirical Economics 22: 571–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiel, Y. and F.A. Cowell. Forthcoming. “Poverty Perceptions and the Poverty Line.” In S.P. Jenkins, A. Kapteyn, A. and B. van Praag, B., eds., Distribution of Welfare and Household Production: An International Perspective. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiel Y., J. Greedy and S. Hum. 1998. “Measuring Inequality Aversion.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B. 1970. “On the Measurement of Inequality.” Journal of Economic Theory 2: 244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B. 1987. “On the Measurement of Poverty.” Econometrica 55: 749–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballano. C. and J. Ruiz-Castillo, J. 1992. “Searching by Questionnaire for the Meaning of Income Inequality.” Working paper 92-43, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Departamento de Economía.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, S., D. Cheng, J.P. Formby and J.W. Smith. 1994. “Preferences for Income Distributions and Redistributions: Evidence from Experiments with Real Income at Stake.” Mimeo, University of Alabama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, S. and J.W. Smith. 1994. “Efficiency, Equity and Democracy: Experimental Evidence on Okun’s Leaky Bucket.” Mimeo, University of Colorado at Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi, M. 1994. “How Should Income be Divided? Questionnaire Evidence From the Theory of ‘The Veil of Ignorance’.” Mimeo, Universita di Pavia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W. and A. Pfingsten. 1990. “Intermediate Inequality: Concepts, Indices and Welfare Implications.” Mathematical Social Science 19: 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buyze, J. 1982. “The Estimation of Welfare Levels of a Cardinal Utility Function.” European Economic Review 17: 325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colasanto, D., A. Kapteyn and J. van der Gaag. 1984. “Two Subjective Definitions of Poverty: Results from the Wisconsin Basic Needs Study.” The Journal of Human Resources 19: 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, F.A. (1985) “‘A Fair Suck of the Sauce Bottle’ or What do You Mean by Inequality?” Economic Record 6: 567–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, H. 1920. “The Measurement of the Inequality of Incomes.” Economic Journal 30: 348–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J.E. 1984. “On Economic Poverty: A Survey of Aggregate Measures.” Advances in Econometrics 3: 215–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gevers, L., H. Glejser and J. Rouyer. 1979. “Professed Inequality Aversion and its Error Component.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 81: 238–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glejser, H., L. Gevers, Ph. Lambot and J.A. Morales J.A. 1977. “An Econometric Study of the Variables Determining Inequality Aversion among Students.” European Economic Review 10: 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goedhart, T., V. Halberstadt, A. Kapteyn, and B.M.S. van Praag. 1977. “The Poverty Line: Concept and Measurement.” The Journal of Human Resources 12: 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars, A.J.M. 1986. The Perception of Poverty. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars, A.J.M. and B.M.S. van Praag. 1985. “A Synthesis of Poverty Line Definitions.” Review of Income and Wealth 31: 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, E. and Ch. Seidl. 1994a. “Acceptance of Distributional Axioms: Experimental Findings.” In W. Eichhorn, W., ed., Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 67–99.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, E. and Ch. Seidl. 1994b. “Perceptional Inequality and Preferential Judgements: An Empirical Examination of Distributional Judgments.” Public Choice 19: 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Herwaarden, F. and A. Kapteyn. 1981. “Empirical Comparison of the Shape of Welfare Functions.” European Economic Review 15: 261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Herwaarden, F., A. Kapteyn and B.M.S van Praag. 1977. “Twelve Thousand Individual Welfare Functions.” European Economic Review 9: 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapteyn, A. and F.G. van Herwaarden. 1980. “Interdependent Welfare Function and Optimal Income Distributions.” Journal of Public Economic 14: 375–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapteyn, A. and B.M.S. van Praag. 1976. “A New Approach to the Construction of Family Equivalence Scales.” European Economic Review 7: 313–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapteyn, A. and Wänsbeek, T. 1985a, “The Individual Welfare Function — A Review.” Journal of Economic Psychology 6: 333–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapteyn, A. and T. Wänsbeek. 1985b. “The Individual Welfare Function — A Rejoinder.” Journal of Economic Psychology 6: 375–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1969. “The Optimal Production of Social Justice.” In J. Margolis, J. and H. Guitton, H., eds., Public Economics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1976a. “Unequal Inequalities I.” Journal of Economic Theory 12: 416–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1976b. “Unequal Inequalities II.” Journal of Economic Theory 13: 82–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.-Ch. 1996. “Intermediate Measure of Inequality.” Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, G. and J. Rohrbaugh. 1978. “Who Accepts the Pareto Axiom? The Role of Utility and Equity in Arbitration Decisions.” Behavioural Science 23: 446–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfingsten, A. 1988. “Empirical Investigation of Inequality Concepts: A Method and First Results.” Mimeo, Karlsruhe University.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, B.M.S. 1968. Individual Welfare Functions and Consumer Behavior. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, B.M.S. 1971. “The Welfare Function of Income in Belgium: An Empirical Investigation.” European Economic Review 2: 337–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, B.M.S., 1977. “The Perception of Welfare Inequality.” European Economic Review 10: 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, B.M.S. 1978. “The Perception of Income Inequality.” In W. Krelle and A.F. Shorrocks, eds., Personal Income Distribution. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, B.M.S. 1985. “Linking Economics with Psychology — An Economist View.” Journal of Economic Psychology 6: 289–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, B.M.S., T. Goedhart and A. Kapteyn. 1980. “The Poverty Line — A Pilot Survey in Europe.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 62: 461–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, B.M.S. and A. Kapteyn, A. 1973. “Further Evidence of the Individual Welfare Function of Income: An Empirical Investigation in The Netherlands.” European Economic Review 4: 33–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, B.M.S., A. Kapteyn, A. and F.G. van Herwaarden. 1978. “The Individual Welfare Function of Income — A Lognormal Distribution Function.” European Economic Review 11: 395–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratchford, B.T. 1985. “The Individual Welfare Function — A Comment.” Journal of Economic Psychology 6: 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, C. 1988. “Poverty Measurement: A Survey.” In Bös D., M. Rose and C. Seidl, eds., Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. 1973. On Economic Inequality. London: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. 1976. “Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement.” Econometrica 44: 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovink, T. 1992. “Perception of Poverty and Income Satisfaction — An Empirical Analysis of Slovene Households.” Journal of Economic Psychology 13: 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, L.S. 1986. “Inequality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 99–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, L.S. 1993. Inequality. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vos, K. and T.I. Garner. 1991. “An Evaluation of Subjective Poverty Definitions: Comparing Results from the US and The Netherlands.” Review of Income and Wealth 37: 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wänsbeek, T. and A. Kapteyn. 1983. “Tackling Hard Questions by Means of Soft Methods: The Use of Individual Welfare Functions in Socio-economic Policy.” Kyklos 36: 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierenga, B. 1978. “The Individual Welfare Function of Income: A Lognormal Distribution Function?” European Economic Review 11: 387–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amiel, Y. (1999). The Measurement of Income Inequality: The Subjective Approach. In: Silber, J. (eds) Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5897-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4413-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics