Abstract
In my comments, I will spend most of my time on Moore’s paradox—I want to raise some questions, first about just what problem the paradox poses, and what counts as a solution to it; second, about what solution to the problem is being proposed, and how it relates to what Wittgenstein said and thought about Moore’s paradox. But as Professor Goldstein says, he follows a circuitous path in his paper, and I can’t resist a brief comment about a bit of the scenery that he passes by on his route to his solution to the paradox. So before getting to Moore’s paradox I will first take a look at the story of Mei-Li.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stalnaker, R. (2000). On “Moore’s Paradox”. In: Engel, P. (eds) Believing and Accepting. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 83. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4042-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4042-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5782-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4042-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive