Skip to main content

A field comparison of lime requirement indices for maize

  • Chapter
Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH

Part of the book series: Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences ((DPSS,volume 45))

Abstract

Due, in part, to the relative paucity of published comparisons based on field generated data, there is still poor agreement regarding the relative merits of lime requirement indices based on exchangeable Al and those based on pH. The objective of this study was to compare such indices using results obtained from long-term field experiments. Data were obtained over 22 site-years from lime trials conducted on clay (Typic Haplorthox) and sandy loam (Plinthic Paleudult) soils differing widely in organic carbon content. Relative maize (Zea mays L.) yields were used to compare the prognostic value of soil pH with indices obtained using exchangeable Al and exchangeable acidity (Al + H). Both within and across soils, pH proved to be markedly inferior to Al based indices. Exchangeable acid saturation of the effective cation exchange capacity, a readily obtained and popular index of lime requirement in some countries, proved as effective as less easily acquired indices based on exchangeable Al per se. The findings reported are consistent with those of many glasshouse studies and support the viewpoint that indices based on Al or acid saturation should replace pH as a measure of lime requirement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abruna F, Pearson R W and Perez-Escolar R 1975 Lime response of corn and soybeans grown on typical Oxisols and Ultisols of Puerto Rico. Soil Manage. Trop. Am. Proc. Semin. 261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams F 1984 Crop response to lime in the southern United States. In Soil Acidity and Liming. Second Edition. Ed. F Adams. pp 211–265. Agronomy 12, Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awad A S, Edwards D G and Milham P J 1976 Effect of pH and phosphate on soluble soil aluminium and on growth and composition of Kikuyu grass. Plant and Soil 45, 531–542.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cate R B and Nelson L A 1965 A rapid method for correlation of soil test analyses with plant response data. Tech. Bull. No. 1. ISFEI series, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina M P W and Channon P 1988 Acid-subsoil amelioration. 1. A comparison of several mechanical procedures. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52, 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farina M P W, Channon P and Sumner M E 1981 A glasshouse comparison of several lime requirement indexes for maize. Crop Prod. 10, 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina M P W, Sumner M E, Plank C O and Letzsch W S 1980 Exchangeable aluminium and pH as indicators of lime requirement for corn. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 1036–1041.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foy C D 1984 Physiological effects of hydrogen, aluminum and manganese toxicities in acid soil. In Soil Acidity and Liming. Second Edition. Ed. F Adams. pp 57–97. Agronomy 12, Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox R H 1979 Soil pH, aluminum saturation, and corn grain yield. Soil Sci. 127, 330–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen D K, Miller M H and Juo A S R 1980 Liming and lime-phosphorus-zinc interactions in two Nigerian Ultisols. II. Effects on maize root and shoot growth. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 1127–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt P B and Nyborg M 1987 Field calibration of liming responses of four crops using soil pH, Al and Mn. Plant and Soil 102, 21–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hume L J, Ofsoski N J and Reynolds J 1988 Influence of pH, exchangeable aluminium and 0.02 M CaCl2-extractable aluminium on the growth and nitrogen-fixing activity of white clover (Trifolium repens) in some New Zealand soils. Plant and Soil 111, 111–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamprath E J 1970 Lime requirements of soils — Inactive toxic substances or favourable pH range. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34, 364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamprath E J 1984 Crop response to lime on soils in the tropics. In Soil Acidity and Liming. Second Edition. Ed. F Adams. pp 349–368. Agronomy 12, Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J A and Powell H K J 1986 Colorimetric determination of aluminum (III) with chrome azurol S and the reactivity of hydrolysed aluminium species. Anal. Chim. Acta. 18, 329–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krizek D T and Foy C D 1988 Role of water stress in differential aluminum tolerance of two barley cultivars grown in an acid soil. J. Plant Nutr. 11, 351–368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martini J A, Kochhann R A, Gomes E P and Langer F 1977 Response of wheat cultivars to liming in some high Al Oxisols of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Agron. J. 69, 612–616.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLean E O 1970 Lime requirements of soils — Inactive toxic substances or favourable pH range. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34, 363–364.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLean E O and Brown J R 1984 Crop response to lime in the Midwestern United States. In Soil Acidity and Liming. Second Edition. Ed. F Adams. pp 267–304. Agronomy 12, Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble A D, Fey M V and Sumner M E 1988 Calcium-aluminum balance and the growth of soybean roots in nutrient solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52, 1651–1656.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve N G and Sumner M E 1970 Lime requirements of Natal Oxisols based on exchangeable aluminum. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34, 595–598.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shainberg I, Sumner M E, Miller W P, Farina M P W, Pavan M A and Fey M V 1989 Use of gypsum on soils: A review. Adv. Soil Sci. 9, 1–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner M E and Farina M P W 1986 Phosphorus interactions with other nutrients and lime in field cropping systems. Adv. Soil Sci. 5, 201–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas G W and Hargrove W L 1984 The chemistry of soil acidity. In Soil Acidity and Liming. Second Edition. Ed. F Adams. pp 4–56. Agronomy 12, Am. Soc. Agron. Madison. WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber M D, Hoyt P B and Corneau D 1982 Soluble Al, exchangeable Al, base saturation and pH in relation to barley yield on Canadian acid soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 62, 397–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright R J 1989 Soil aluminum toxicity and plant growth. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 20, 1479–1497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Farina, M.P.W., Channon, P. (1991). A field comparison of lime requirement indices for maize. In: Wright, R.J., Baligar, V.C., Murrmann, R.P. (eds) Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 45. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3438-5_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3438-5_52

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5520-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3438-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics