Abstract
The motivation for the development of RDEU theory and other generalizations of EU theory was twofold. First, there was the desire, in view of the well known violations of the predictions of EU theory, to produce a more adequate descriptive model of choice under uncertainty. Second, there was a widespread view that the independence axiom lacked the normative appeal of the dominance and transitivity axioms (the continuity and completeness axioms are primarily technical). Historically the second concern came first. The Allais ‘paradox’ was developed to illustrate problems with the von Neumann-Morgenstern independence axiom. Savage’s sure thing principle was a reformulation of the independence axiom designed to enhance its normative appeal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Quiggin, J. (1993). Some Normative Properties of RDEU. In: Generalized Expected Utility Theory. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2182-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2182-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4966-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2182-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive