Abstract
The topic of light quantification seems confusing, not only to the layman and the student, but also to the expert. Some reasons for this confusion are as follows: (i) The amount or intensity of light is often regarded as something that can be completely described by a number. Such a view disregards the following facts, (a) Light consists of components with different wavelength. A full description of the light would thus give information about the ‘amount’ of light of each wavelength, (b) Light has direction. The simplest case is that all the light being considered has the same direction, i.e. the light is collimated (the rays are all parallel). Another case is that light is isotropic, i.e. all directions are equally represented. Between these extremes there is an infinite number of possible distributions of directional components. (c) Light may be polarized, either circularly or plane polarized (Chapter 7.2). In the rest of this chapter this complication will be disregarded, but one should always be aware of the fact that a device such as a photocell may be differentially sensitive to components of different polarization, and polarization may be introduced by part of an experimental setup, such as a monochromator or a reflecting surface, (d) Light may be more or less coherent, i.e. the photons more or less ‘in step’. This complication, which is important in some experiments, e.g. with laser light, will also be neglected, (e) Finally, people often disregard, neglect or confuse the time factor. It should be decided whether to express an instantaneous or a time-integrated quantity, e.g. fluence rate or fluence, power or energy. Power means energy per unit time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Further reading
Diffey B.L. (ed.) (1989) Radiation Measurement in Photobiology. Academic Press, London.
Krizek D.T. (1982) Guidelines for measuring and reporting environmental conditions in controlled-environment studies. Physiol Plant. 56: 231–235.
References
Caldwell M.M. (1971) Solar UV irradiation and the growth and development of higher plants. In: Photophysiology, Vol. VI, pp.131–177, Giese A.C. (ed.). Academic Press, New York.
Caldwell M.M., Camp L.B., Warner C.W. and Flint S.D. (1986) Action spectra and their key role in assessing the biological consequences of solar UV-B radiation change. In: Stratospheric Ozone Reduction, Solar Ultraviolet, Radiation and Plant Life, pp. 87–111, Worrest R.C. and Caldwell MM. (eds.) NATO ASI Series G: Ecological Sciences, Vol. 8.
Gram F. and Becherer R.J. (1979) Optical Radiation Measurements 1, pp. 14–15, Academic Press, New York.
Holmes M.G., Klein W.H. and Sager J.C. (1985) Photons, flux, and some light on philology. Hort. Sci. 20: 29–31.
Jerlov N.G. (1968) Optical Oceanography. Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 68-12475.
Rundel R.D. (1983) Action spectra and estimation of biologically effective UV radiation. Physiol. Plant. 58: 360–366.
Rupert C.S. (1974) Dosimetric concepts in photobiology. Photochem, Photobiol. 20: 203–212.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Björn, L.O., Vogelmann, T.C. (1994). Quantification of light. In: Kendrick, R.E., Kronenberg, G.H.M. (eds) Photomorphogenesis in Plants. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1884-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1884-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-2551-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1884-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive