Abstract
The institutional transformation that the linguistically divided state of Belgium has gone through in the past few decades has perhaps been soundless. However, this has not made its consequences any less fundamental (Von Busekist, 1998; Leton, & Miroir, 1999; Delwit, De Waele, & Magnette, 1999). Various, but mostly language-related, matters have pushed the formerly unitary state of Belgium into a series of constitutional reforms that have divided up the country into several largely independent parts. Place-tied administrative matters have been devolved to the regions of Flanders, Brussels and Wallonia, whereas person-related matters appear on the tables of the Dutch-speaking, French-speaking and German-speaking communities. As a result of this division of competencies, the territories of federal entities are overlapping. The territory of the French-speaking community includes the territories of the Walloon and Brussels region. The territories of the Flemish and Brussels regions are within the realm of the Dutch speaking community. The German speaking community covers a few districts in the east of Wallonia. In Brussels, individuals are free to decide if their interests are taken care of by the French or the Flemish community or if they vote for the French or the Flemish electoral college. To complicate matters even further, the political and administrative institutions of the Dutch speaking community and the Flemish region have been integrated into one. As a result, there is only one Flemish parliament (in Brussels). The set of tasks that have remained with the federal government is fairly small in comparison with nearly all its neighbouring states, especially France, the Netherlands and Britain, but also to its federal neighbour Germany. Foreign policy officially is still a national competency, but the Flemish region has recently opened its own diplomatic offices in The Hague and Paris, something German states are not very likely to do. Furthermore, the Belgian regions and communities have ‘treaty-making capacity’ with respect to the issues for which they are exclusively responsible. This means that they can sign treaties without interference of the Belgian state. For example, German states always have to acquire approval of the federal state. When fulfilling their occasional duty as half-yearly presidents of the European Council and the representation in the council of ministers, Flemish and French-speaking representatives regularly alternate roles to the disbelief of a great many other European leaders. Finally, the federal role in the levying and redistribution of income taxes, almost a hallmark of the existence of a national state, is not undisputed, especially in Flanders. Politicians and civil servants in various policy domains are growing less and less familiar with the contents and developments of policies in the other regions and discover, sometimes to their own surprise, that the different entities are drifting further and further apart. They occasionally regret that each of them is going their separate ways, but the new realities are hard to ignore. Legislation painfully brokered between political parties at the national level have led to empowered authorities at the regional level.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrechts, L. (1980). Ruimtelijke ordening in België: Een eerste schets, Stedebouw en Volkshuisvesting, 63(2), 93–102.
Albrechts, L. (1999). Planners as Catalysts and Initiators of Change: The New Structure Plan for Flanders, European Planning Studies, 7(5), 587–603.
Albrechts, L. (2001a). How to proceed from image and discourse to action: as applied to the Flemish Diamond, Urban Studies, 38(4), 733–745.
Albrechts, L. (2001b). Devolution, regional governance and planning systems in Belgium, International Planning Studies, 6(2), 167–182.
Blom, J.C.H., & Lamberts, E. (1999). History of the Low Countries. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Borret, K., & Jacobs, S. (1999). Het getemde wilde wonen: Transformaties in de Vlaamse woningbouw, De Architect, December, 40–45.
De Coninck, D. (1993). Blijvende blunders; De grote nutteloze werken, Antwerpen: Kritak.
De Foer, S. (2001). Onder Hollanders: Een Vlaming ontdekt Nederland, Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Balans.
De la Guérivière, J. (1994). Belgique: La revanche des langes, Paris: Edition du Seuil.
Delwaide, J. (1996). De natie als constructie. Het geval Belgie. Acta Politica, 31(1), 53–82.
Delwit P., De Waele, J.M., & Magnette, P. (1999). Gouverner la Belgique: clivages et compromis dans une société complexe. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
De Vries, J. (2002). Grenzen verkend. Internationalisering van de ruimtelijke planning in de Benelux. Serie stedelijke en regionale Verkenningen, Delft: Delftse Universitaire Pers.
De Vries, J., & Van Den Broeck, J. (1997). Benelux: a microcosm of planning cultures, Built Environment, 23(1), 58–69.
Eppink, DJ. (1998). Vreemde buren: Over politiek in Nederland en België. Amsterdam/Antwerpen: Uitgeverij Contact.
European Commission (1999). Sixth Periodic Report on the Social and Economic Situation and Development of Regions in the European Union, Brussels/Luxembourg: Regional Policy DG.
Faludi, A. (1987). A Decision Centred View of Environmental Planning, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Faludi, A., & Van der Valk, A. (1994). Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gerritsen, M. (2001). Cultuur als spelbreker: De communicatieve gevolgen van cultuurverschillen tussen Nederland en Vlaanderen. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
Geyl, P. (1932). History of the Dutch-speaking peoples (1555-1648), London: Phoenix Press.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Cultures consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Allemaal andersdenkenden: omgaan met cultuurverschillen, Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Contact.
Israel, J.I. (1995). The Dutch republic; its rise, greatness and fall (1477-1806), Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Janssens, P. (1985). De ontwikkeling van de ruimtelijke ordening in België. Ruimtelijke planning, 14(1), 1–35.
Kingdon, J.W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston: Little Brown.
Leton, A., & Miroir, A. (1999). Les conflits communautaires en Belgique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap (MVG) (1997). Ruimtelijk Structuurplan Vlaanderen: integrale versie. Departement Leefmilieu en Infrastructuur, Administratie Ruimtelijke Ordening, Huisvesting, Monumenten en Landschappen, Afdeling Ruimtelijke Planning, Brussel.
Reade, E. (1987). British town and country planning. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Rose, R. (1993). Lesson-drawing in public policy: a guide to learning across time and space. Chatham: Chatham House.
Ter Horst, P., & Van der Ven, J. (1997). Fragmented Brussels and consolidated Amsterdam: A comparative study of the spatial organization of property rights. Amsterdam: Netherlands Geographical Society.
Van Dam, D. (1996). Blijven we buren in Belgie?: Vlamingen en Walen over Vlamingen en Walen, Leuven: Uitgeverij Van Halewyck.
Van den Broeck, J. (2001). Central Belgium: a ‘Park City’?: A policy based on de-concentrated clustering’, New approaches to land management for sustainable urban regions. International workshop in conjunction with the international land policy forum sponsored by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, 29-31 October, University of Tokyo, Japan.
Van Istendael, G. (1989). Het Belgisch labyrinth: Wakker worden in een ander land. Amsterdam/Antwerpen: Uitgeverij Arbeiderspers.
Verreist, W. (1992). Trots en schaamte van de Vlaming. Kapellen: De Nederlandsche BoekhandelAJitgeverij Pelckmans.
Von Busekist, A. (1998). La Belgique; Politique des langes et construction de l’Etat de 1780 à nos Jours. Paris/Bruxelles: Duculot.
Witlox, F. (2000). De IJzeren Rijn en de Betuwelijn: Het debat op dejuiste sporen? Leuven/Apeldoorn: Garant.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Jong, M., De Vries, J. (2002). The Merits of Keeping Cool While Hearing the Siren Calls. In: De Jong, M., Lalenis, K., Mamadouh, V. (eds) The Theory and Practice of Institutional Transplantation. The GeoJournal Library, vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0001-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0001-4_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1108-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0001-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive