Abstract
The construction of metrological systems is an important topic in the study of research-technology. Research-technologists have to elaborate materials and procedures that help certify the reliability of the instruments they develop. Building an instrument’s metrology is a task involving much more than strictly technical work: diplomacy, financial risk-taking, social know-how and certain negotiation skills are among the ingredients intervening in the metrological elaboration of research-technology. Particularly, this work requires the anticipation of the way in which an instrument’s reliability and precision will be evaluated by different audiences, in order for the device to conform to their criteria of relevance. The recent development of a measurement technology, Differential Optical Absorption Spectrometry (DOAS), illustrates the difficulty of this task. An application of spectroscopic technology to the monitoring of the atmosphere’s chemical composition, DOAS was developed during the 1980s in several laboratories and firms in Europe. It seemed to offer new solutions for the detection of low-concentration chemical components. Such components, like ozone or sulfur dioxide, are present only at a very low rate in the atmosphere but can have a high degree of toxicity for human health or for the environment. For the researchers and engineers who, in France, Germany, England, Belgium and Sweden, engaged in the construction of DOAS instruments, the technology presented — and it still presents — a great number of interesting advantages when compared to the other measurement technologies then available. But as we will see, it also raised serious metrological questions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akerlof, George A. (1970). The market for lemons: qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84:488–500.
Alder, Ken (1998). Making things the same. Social Studies of Science 28(4): 499–546.
Callon, Michael (1998). The laws of the markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
Camy-Peyret, Claude, Galle, B., Carleer, M., Clerbaux, C., Colin, R., Fayt, C., Goutail, F., Pinharanda, M.N., Pommereau, J., Haussman, M., Platt, U., Pundt, I., Rudolph, T., Hermans, C., Simon, P.C., Vandaele, A.C., Plane, J.M.C., and Smith, N. (1996). Intercomparison of instruments for tropospheric measurements using differential optical absorption spectroscopy. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 23(1): 51–80.
Clarke, Adele E. (1991). Social worlds/arenas theory as organizational theory, in D.R. Maines (ed.), Social organization arid social process. Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss (pp. 119–58). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Collins, Harry M. (1985). Changing order, replication and induction in scientific practice. London: Sage.
Collins, Harry M. (1988). Public experiments and displays of virtuosity: The core-set revisited. Social Studies of Science 18: 725–48.
Curtis, Bruce (1998). From the moral thermometer to money. Social Studies of Science 28(4): 547–70.
Dobson, G.M.B. (1931). A photoelectric spectrophotometer for measuring atmospheric ozone. Proceedings of the Physical Society 43: 324–28.
Dodier, Nicolas (1993). Les arènes des habilités techniques, in B. Conein, N. Dodier and L. Thévenot (eds.), Raison pratique n° 4. Les objets dans l’action (pp. 115–39). Paris: Edition de l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.
Karpik, Lucien (1989). L’économie de la qualité. Revue française de sociologie 30(2): 187–210.
Keating, Peter and Cambrosio, Alberto (1997). Interlaboratory life: Regulating flow cytometry, in J.-P. Gaudillière, I. Löwy, and D. Pestre (eds.), The invisible industrialist: Manufacturers and the construction of scientific knowledge (pp. 250–95). London: Macmillan.
Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mallard, Alexandre (1996). Les instruments dans la coordination de l’action. Pratiques techniques, métrologie, instrument scientifique. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Paris: Ecole des Mines.
Mallard, Alexandre (1998). Compare, standardize, and settle agreement: On some usual metrological problems. Social Studies of Science 28(4): 571–601.
Metropolitan measures and their margins of error. Paper presented at the Séminaire du Centre de Recherche en Histoire des Sciences et des Technique, Paris.
Platt, Ulrich and Perner, Dieter (1983). Measurement of atmospheric trace gases by long path differential UV/visible spectroscopy. Springer Series in Optical Sciences 39:95–105.
Polanyi, Michael (1958). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Schaffer, Simon (1997, 7 January). Metropolitan measures and their margins of error. Paper presented at the Séminaire du Centre de Recherche en Histoire des Sciences et des Technique, Cité desSciences et de l’Industrie, Paris.
Shinn, Terry (1997). Crossing boundaries: The emergence of reseach-technology communities, in H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff (eds.), Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations (pp. 85–96). London: Cassell Academic Press.
Sibum, Otto (1998). Les gestes de la mesure: Joule, les pratiques de la brasserie et la sciences. Paris: Annales Histoires Sciences Sociales.
Thévenot, Laurent (1994). Le régime de familiarité. Des choses en personne. Genèses 17 (September): 72–101.
Timmermans, Stefan and Berg, Marc (1997). Standardization in action: Achieving local universality through medical protocols. Social Studies of Science 27:273–305.
Wise, M. Norton (1995). The values of precision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mallard, A. (2001). From the Laboratory to the Market: The Metrological Arenas of Research-Technology. In: Joerges, B., Shinn, T. (eds) Instrumentation Between Science, State and Industry. Sociology of the Sciences, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9032-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9032-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0242-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9032-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive