Abstract
One of the things I’d like to see come out of this conference is a clarification of the issues between Isaac Levi and me.1 I take it that Levi’s scruples about partial belief and probability kinematics are not idiosyncratic, nor are my scruples about his work on acceptance, so that the matter may be of general interest. When Dracula meets Wolfman in the movies it is not simply I-and-thou: They gibber and slaver for all vampires and all werewolves everywhere. So let it be with us.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
G. E. Bates, Probability, Reading, Mass., 1965.
Ethan Bolker, Functions Resembling Quotients of Measures, Dissertation, Harvard University, 1965.
Ethan Bolker, ‘Functions Resembling Quotients of Measures’, Trans. American Mathematical Society 124 (1966) 292–312.
Ethan Bolker, ‘A Simultaneous Axiomatization of Utility and Subjective Probability’, Philosophy of Science 34 (1967) 333–40.
M. Friedman and L. J. Savage, ‘The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk’, Journal of Political Economy 56 (1948) 279–304.
Ian Hacking, ‘Slightly More Realistic Personal Probability’, Philosophy of Science 34 (1967) 311–25.
Richard C. Jeffrey, The Logic of Decision, New York 1965.
Richard C. Jeffrey, ‘Probable Knowledge’, in The Problem of Inductive Logic (ed. by I. Lakatos ), Amsterdam 1968, pp. 166–80.
Richard C. Jeffrey, ‘Review of I. Levi’s Gambling With Truth’, Journal of Philosophy 65 (1968) 313–22.
Isaac Levi, Gambling With Truth, New York and London 1967.
Isaac Levi, ‘Probability Kinematics’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (1967) 197–209.
Howard Riaffa, Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty, Reading, Mass., 1968.
F. P. Ramsey, The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays, London and New York 1931.
Leonard J. Savage, The Foundations of Statistics, New York 1954.
Patrick Suppes, ‘Rational Changes of Belief’, in The Problem of Inductive Logic (ed. by I. Lakatos ), Amsterdam 1968, pp. 186–8.
Richard Todd, ‘Where Money Grows on Decision Trees’, New York Times Magazine, November 10, 1968.
I. Todhunter, A History of the Mathematical Theory of Probability, New York 1949.
References
Those issues were indeed greatly clarified during the conference; but it seems best to publish the paper just as it was presented at the conference even unto the title - except for minor corrections throughout, and for some brief concluding remarks in Section V.
My’ account is in [7]; it is a modification and, as I see it, an improvement of the accounts of Ramsey [13] and Savage [14].
See [2], [3], and [4]. Bolker’s work was prior to mine: A case in which pure mathematics had an unexpected application.
For some striking illustrations of the flexibility of the Bayesian framework, see [5], where some puzzling and rather complex behavior is rationalized via a simple hypothesis about the shape of the utility curve for income.
This is the celebrated argument from coherence: If his degrees of belief do not satisfy the probability axioms there will be a set of bets, each of which looks fair to the agent, but on which he will with logical necessity suffer an overall loss. See [7], p. 49 and references given there.
The room in which this was read had some 40 people in it. Imagine that the date was September 25.
Politics 12603 13.
One may take this as a reply to the objection, ‘One difficulty immediately leaps to the eye…’, just below the formula in [11], p. 205.
In [10], p. 13, Levi observes that his “critical cognitivism renders asunder, at least partially, what many philosophers have endeavored to join together - theoretical and practical wisdom”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1970 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jeffrey, R.C. (1970). Dracula Meets Wolfman: Acceptance vs. Partial Belief. In: Swain, M. (eds) Induction, Acceptance and Rational Belief. Synthese Library, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3390-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3390-9_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3392-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3390-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive