Abstract
It is remarkable that after almost a half century of development and continuing success, there still is no general agreement on how the quantum theory is to be interpreted, or indeed whether a consistent interpretation, using no external concepts is possible. We are aware that the meaning (or the interpretation) of the theories we invent can change. Consider, for example, the equation Paul Dirac proposed for the electron — surely one of the most beautiful creations of the twentieth century. Conceived originally as a wave equation for the electron consistent with the principle of relativity, it is now interpreted as the field equation for a particle of spin 1/2, while almost every structural relation as originally written down by Dirac is maintained. We are also aware that we can proceed even when it is likely that our theories are inconsistent. This could not be more clearly demonstrated than by the post World War II success of the renormalization programme in quantum electrodynamics — the union in the quantum theory of the fields of Dirac and Maxwell. There the incredible numerical agreement between theory and experiment is balanced by the strong possibility that at their roots the axioms of the theory as usually stated are inconsistent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Notes
J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (translated by Robert T. Beyer), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (1965).
L. N. Cooper and D. van Vechten, Amer. J. Phys. 37, 1212–1220 (1969).
J. A. Wheeler, Rev. Mod. Phys 29, 463 (1957).
H. Everett III, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957).
K. Gottfried, Quantum Mechanics, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York (1966), vol. I, pp. 165–189.
B. DeWitt, Physics Today (1970).
D. Bohm, Quantum Theory, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1951), Chap. 22.
E. P. Wigner, Amer. J. Phys. 31, 12 (1963).
R. C. Jaklevic, J. Lambe, A. H. Silver and J. E. Mercereau, Phys. Rev. Letters 12, 159 (1964); R. C. Jaklevic, J. Lambe, A. H. Silver and J. E. Mercereau, Phys. Rev. Letters 12, 274 (1964).
P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Oxford, third edition (1947), p. 35.
J. S. Bell, International Colloquium on Issues in Contemporary Physics and Philosophy of Science, and Their Relevance for our Society, Penn State University, September 1971.
E. P. Wigner, The Scientist Speculates (edited by I. J. Good), London (1961), reprinted in Symmetries and Reflections, Bloomington (1967), p. 171.
B. DeWitt, ref. 6 and B. d’Espagnat, Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, W. A. Benjamin Inc., Menlo Park, California (1971). See especially chapter 20.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cooper, L.N. (1973). Wavefunction and Observer in the Quantum Theory. In: Mehra, J. (eds) The Physicist’s Conception of Nature. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2602-4_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2602-4_32
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2604-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2602-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive