Abstract
The problem discussed here is to find a basis for a uniform treatment of the relation between pronouns and their antecedents, taking into account both linguists’ and philosophers’ approaches. The two main candidates would appear to be the linguists’ notion of coreference and the philosophers’ notion of pronouns as variables. The notion of coreference can be extended to many but not all cases where the antecedent is non-referential. The pronouns-as-variables approach appears to come closer to full generality, but there are some examples of ‘pronouns of laziness’ which appear to resist either of the two approaches.
Earlier versions of this paper, under various titles, were presented orally to the Claremont Philosophical Discussion Group, the UCLA Linguistics Colloquium, the IBM Watson Research Center, the IBM Systems Development Division at Endicott, and at Princeton University. Criticisms and suggestions received on these occasions have helped lead to many revisions and additions. I am particularly grateful for the sympathetic encouragement given me by philosophers such as David Kaplan, Jack Vickers, and Gilbert Harman in this attempt to communicate simultaneously with linguists and philosophers
The most important sources for the present work are the following: among linguists, Postal (1968), for bringing the notion of coreference to prominence; Bach (1969, 1970), for first pointing out some fundamental problems with the treatment of pronominalization as a substitution process; McCawley [1970, 1968], for his attempts to show logical notation, including the use of variables, to be of linguistic relevance; and Karttunen (1968a, b, 1969a, b), who has been exploring many of the same problems as are discussed here, and from whom a number of the examples below are taken or adapted (some of which are originally due to Baker (1966)). Among philosophers, the main sources are Quine (1960), for the notion of opacity and its relation to reference; Donnellan (1966), for claiming a referential/attributive distinction in definite noun phrases even in transparent contexts; and Geach (1962) for distinguishing ‘pronouns of laziness’ from pronouns used like variables.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Bach, Emmon, ‘Nouns and Noun Phrases’ in Universals in Linguistic Theory (ed. by Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York, 1968, pp. 90–122.
Bach, Emmon, ‘Anti-Pronominalization’ (unpublished, University of Texas, Austin) 1969.
Bach, Emmon, ‘Problominalization’, Linguistic Inquiry 1 (1970) 121–122.
Bach, Emmon and Harms, Robert T., (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York, 1968.
Baker, C. L., Definiteness and Indefiniteness in English (unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Illinois), 1966.
Dean, Janet, ‘Nonspecific Noun Phrases in English’ in Harvard Computational Laboratory Report No. NSF-20, Cambridge, Mass., 1968.
Donnellan, Keith, ‘Reference and Definite Descriptions’, The Philosophical Review 75 (1966) 281–304.
Fillmore, C. J., ‘On the Syntax of Preverbs’, Glossa 1 (1967) 91–125.
Geach, P. T., Reference and Generality, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 1962.
Geach, P. T., ‘Intentional Identity’, Journal of Philosophy 64 (1967) 627–632.
Geach, P. T., ‘Quine’s Syntactical Insights’, Synthese 19 (1968) 118–129.
Kaplan, David, ‘Quantifying In’, Synthese 19 (1968–69) 178–214.
Karttunen, Lauri, The Identity of Noun Phrases, Rand Corporation Publication P-3756, Santa Monica, Calif., 1967.
Karttunen, Lauri, What Do Referential Indices Refer to?, Rand Corporation Publication P-3854, Santa Monica, Calif., 1968a.
Karttunen, Lauri, ‘Co-Reference and Discourse’ (read at the winter meeting, Linguistic Society of America, New York) 1968b.
Karttunen, Lauri, ‘Migs and Pilots’ (unpublished, University of Texas, Austin) 1969a.
Karttunen, Lauri, ‘Pronouns and Variables’ in Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (ed. by Robert I. Binnick et al.), Dept. of Linguistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill., 1969b.
Klima, E. S., ‘Negation in English’ in The Structure of Language (ed. by Jerry A. Fodor and Jerrold J. Katz), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1964, pp. 246–323.
Langacker, Ronald, ‘On Pronominalization and the Chain of Command’ in Modern Studies in English (ed. by David Reibel and Sanford Schane), Prentice-Hall, Engle-wood Cliffs, N.J., 1969, pp. 160–186.
McCawley, James D., ‘The Role of Semantics in a Grammar’ in Universals in Linguistic Theory (ed. by Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York, 1968, pp. 124–169.
McCawley, James D., ‘Where Do Noun Phrases Come from?’, to appear in Readings in Transformational Grammar (ed. by Roderick Jacobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum), Blaisdell, Boston, Mass., forthcoming.
Postal, Paul M., ‘On So-Called “Pronouns” in English’ in Georgetown University Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, Vol. 19 (ed. by Francis P., Dinneen, S.J.), Washington, D.C., 1966, pp. 177–206.
Postal, Paul M., ‘Cross-Over Phenomena: A Study in the Grammar of Coreference’ in Specification and Utilization of a Transformational Grammar (Scientific Report No. 3), IBM Research Center, Yorktown Heights, N.Y., 1968.
Quine, W. V., Word and Object, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1960.
Quine, W. V., From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1953, (2nd ed. 1961).
Ross, John R., Constraints on Variables in Syntax (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T., Cambridge, Mass.), 1967.
Ross, John R., ‘On the Cyclic Nature of English Pronominalization’ in To Honour Roman Jakobson, Vol. III, Mouton, The Hague, 1968, pp. 1669–1682.
Stockwell, R. P., Schachter, P. S., and Partee, B. H., Integration of Transformational Theories on English Syntax, Government Document ESD-TR-68-419, Los Angeles, 1968 (UESP 1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1972 D. Reidel Publishing Company Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Partee, B.H. (1972). Opacity, Coreference, and Pronouns. In: Davidson, D., Harman, G. (eds) Semantics of Natural Language. Synthese Library, vol 40. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0310-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2557-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive