Abstract
Standard approaches to hypothesis testing presuppose a partition of mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive hypotheses. It is implicit in these approaches that one can assess an hypothesis only relative to a specified set of alternatives. R. A. Fisher was perhaps the one notable exception to this rule among influential statisticians. He regarded the likelihood function as the appropriate vehicle for comparing hypotheses, but developed significance tests as the appropriate measure of evidence when no alternatives are in question.1 Significance tests, though variously interpreted, have played a major role in research. That is unsurprising, for in the preliminary stages of an investigation — the exploratory phase — no theories of the phenomena are at hand. The researcher wishes merely to get a feel for whether a hunch or proto-theory represents a promising line of attack on a problem. Unfortunately, Fisher’s conception is shot full of difficulties,2 so much so, that many have doubted whether significance tests are more helpful than misleading.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Anscombe, F. J.: 1963, ‘Tests of Goodness of Fit’, J. Roy. Stat. Soc., B. 25, 81–94.
Berkson, J.: 1942, ‘Tests of Significance Considered as Evidence’, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 37, 325–335.
Birnbaum, Allan: 1969, ‘Concepts of Statistical Evidence’, in Philosophy, Science and Method (ed. by S. Morgenbesser, P. Suppes, and M. White), St. Martin’s Press, New York.
Fisher, R. A.: 1935, The Design of Experiments, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
Fisher, R. A.: 1956, Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
Goodman, L. and Kruskal, W. H.: 1954, 1959, 1963, ‘Measures of Association for Cross-Classification’, Parts I, II, and III, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 49, 732
Goodman, L. and Kruskal, W. H.: 1954, 1959, 1963, ‘Measures of Association for Cross-Classification’, Parts I, II, and III, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 54, 123
Goodman, L. and Kruskal, W. H.: 1954, 1959, 1963, ‘Measures of Association for Cross-Classification’, Parts I, II, and III, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 58, 310.
Kendall, M. G.: 1962, Rank Correlation Methods, Griffin, London.
Kendall, M.G. and Stuart, A.: 1967, The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Griffin, London.
Laddaga, R.: 1973, A Defense of the Likelihood Principle, Master’s Thesis, University of South Carolina.
Lehmann, E.: 1959, Testing Statistical Hypotheses, Wiley, New York.
Mather, K.: 1951, The Measurement of Linkage in Heredity, Methuen, London.
Morrison, D. F. and Henkel, R. E.: 1970, The Significance Test Controversy, Aldine, Chicago.
Rosenkrantz, R. D.: 1973, ‘The Significance Test Controversy’, Synthese 26 304–321.
Rosenkrantz, R. D.: 1976, ‘Simplicity’, Foundations of Probability and Statistics and Statistical Theories of Science (ed. by W. Harper and C. Hooker), Vol. 1, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 167–203.
Spielman, S.: 1974, ‘The Logic of Tests of Significance’, Phil. Sci. 41, 211–226.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1977 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosenkrantz, R.D. (1977). Support. In: Inference, Method and Decision. Synthese Library, vol 115. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1237-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1237-9_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0818-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1237-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive