Skip to main content

Investigating ancient duplication events in the Arabidopsis genome

  • Chapter
Genome Evolution

Abstract

The complete genomic analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana has shown that a major fraction of the genome consists of paralogous genes that probably originated through one or more ancient large-scale gene or genome duplication events. However, the number and timing of these duplications still remains unclear, and several different hypotheses have been put forward recently. Here, we reanalyzed duplicated blocks found in the Arabidopsis genome described previously and determined their date of divergence based on silent substitution estimations between the paralogous genes and, where possible, by phylogenetic reconstruction. We show that methods based on averaging protein distances of heterogeneous classes of duplicated genes lead to unreliable conclusions and that a large fraction of blocks duplicated much more recently than assumed previously. We found clear evidence for one large-scale gene or even complete genome duplication event somewhere between 70 to 90 million years ago. Traces pointing to a much older (probably more than 200 million years) large-scale gene duplication event could be detected. However, for now it is impossible to conclude whether these old duplicates are the result of one or more large-scale gene duplication events.

The two authors contributed equally to this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schäffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389–3402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature, 408, 796–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blanc, G., Barakat, A., Guyot, R. Cooke, R., and Delseny, M. (2000) Extensive duplication and reshuffling in the Arabidopsis genome. Plant Cell, 12, 1093–1101.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Conery, J.S., and Lynch, M. (2001) Nucleotide substitutions and the evolution of duplicate genes. In Pacific Symposium on Bio-computing 2001 (Eds., Altman, R.B., Dunker, A.K., Hunter, L., Lauderdale, K. and Klein, T.E.), World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 167–178.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Easteal, S., and Collet, C. (1994) Consistent variation in amino-acid substitution rate, despite uniformity of mutation rate: protein evolution in mammals is not neutral. Mol. Biol. Evol., 11, 643–647.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Friedman, R., and Hughes, A.L. (2001) Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes. Genome Res., 11, 1842–1847.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grant, D., Cregan, P., and Shoemaker, R.C. (2000) Genome organization in dicots: genome duplication in Arabidopsis and synteny between soybean and Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 4168–4173.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grubbs, F. (1969) Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics, 11, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haldane, J.B.S. (1933) The part played by recurrent mutation in evolution. Am. Nat., 67, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall, T.A. (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser., 41, 95–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Holland, P. (1992) Homeobox genes in vertebrate evolution. BioEssays, 14, 267–273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes, A.L. (1999) Phylogenies of developmentally important proteins do not support the hypothesis of two rounds of genome duplication early in vertebrate history. J. Mol. Evol., 48, 565–576.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koch, M., Haubold, B., and Mitchell-Olds, R. (2001) Molecular systematics of the Brassicaceae: evidence from coding plastidic matK and nuclear Chs sequences. Am. J. Bot., 88, 534–544.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kowalski, S.P., Lan, T.-H., Feldmann, K.A., and Paterson, A.H. (1994) Comparative mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica oleracea chromosomes reveals islands of conserved organization. Genetics, 138, 499–510.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ku, H.-M., Vision, T, Liu, J., and Tanksley, S.D. (2000) Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 9121–9126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Leitch, I.J., and Bennett, M.D. (1997) Polyploidy in angiosperms. Trends Plant. Sci., 2, 470–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, W.-H. (1993) Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution. J. Mol. Evol., 36, 96–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, W.-H. (1997) Molecular Evolution, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lin, X., Kaul, S., Rounsley, S., Shea, T.P., Benito, M.-I., Town, C.D., Fujii, C.Y., Mason, T., Bowman, C.L., Barnstead, M., Feldblyum, T.V., Buell, C.R., Ketchum, K.A., Lee, J., Ronning, C.M., Koo, H.L., Moffat, K.S., Cronin, L.A., Shen, M., Pai, G., Van Aken, S., Umayam, L., Tallon, L.J., Gill, J.E., Adams, M.D., Carrera, A.J., Creasy, T.H., Goodman, H.M., Somerville, C.R., Copenhaver, G.P., Preuss, D., Nierman, W.C., White, O., Eisen, J.A., Salzberg, S.L., Fraser, C.M., and Venter, J.C. (1999) Sequence and analysis of chromosome 2 of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature, 402, 761–768.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lukashin, A.V., and Borodovsky, M. (1998) GeneMark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding. Nucleic Acids Res., 26, 1107–1115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lynch, M., and Conery, J.S. (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science, 290, 1151–1155.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mayer, K., Schüller, C., Wambutt, R., Murphy, G., Volckaert, G., Pohl, T. Düsterhöft, A., Stiekema, W., Entian, K.-D., Terryn, N., Harris, B., Ansorge, W., Brandt, P., Grivell, L., Rieger, M., Weichselgartner, M., de Simone, V., Obermaier, B., Mache, R., Müller, M., Kreis, M., Delseny, M., Puigdomenech, P., Watson, M., Schmidtheini, T., Reichert, B., Portatelle, D., Perez-Alonso, M., Boutry, M., Bancroft, I., Vos, P., Hoheisel, J., Zimmermann, W., Wedler, H., Ridley, P., Langham, S.-A., McCullagh, B., Bilham, L., Robben, J., Van der Schueren, J., Grymonprez, B., Chuang, Y.-J., Vandenbussche, F., Braeken, M., Weltjens, I., Voet, M., Bastiaens, I., Aert, R., Defoor, E., Weitzenegger, T., Bothe, G., Ramsperger, U., Hilbert, H., Braun, M., Holzer, E., Brandt, A., Peters, S., van Staveren, M., Dirkse, W., Moo-ijman, P., Klein Lankhorst, R., Rose, M. Hauf, J., Kötter, P., Berneiser, S., Hempel, S., Feldpausch, M., Lamberth, S., Van den Daele, H., De Keyser, A., Buysschaert, C., Gielen, J., Villarroel, R., De Clercq, R., Van Montagu, M., Rogers, J., Cronin, A., Quail, M., Bray-Allen, S., Clark, L., Foggett, J., Hall, S., Kay, M., Lennard, N., McLay, K., Mayes, R., Pettett, A., Rajandream, M.-A., Lyne, M., Benes, V., Rechmann, S., Borkova, D., Blöcker, H., Scharfe, M., Grimm, M., Löhnert, T.-H., Dose, S., de Haan, M., Maarse, A., Schäfer, M., Müller-Auer, S., Gabel, C., Fuchs, M., Fartmann, B., Granderath, K., Dauner, D., Herzl, A., Neumann, S., Argiriou, A., Vitale, D., Liguori, R., Piravandi, E., Massenet, O., Quigley, F., Clabauld, G., Mündlein, A., Felber, R., Schnabl, S., Hiller, R., Schmidt, W., Lecharny, A., Aubourg, S., Chefdor, F., Cooke, R., Berger, C., Montfort, A., Casacuberta, E., Gibbons, T., Weber, N., Vandenbol, M., Bargues, M., Terol, J., Torres, A., Perez-Perez, A., Purnelle, B., Bent, E., Johnson, S., Tacon, D., Jesse, T., Heijnen, L., Schwarz, S., Scholler, P., Heber, S., Francs, P., Bielke, C., Frishman, D., Haase, D., Lemcke, K., Mewes, H.W., Stocker, S., Zaccaria, P., Bevan, M., Wilson, R.K., de la Bastide, M., Habermann, K., Parnell, L., Dedhia, N., Gnoj, L., Schutz, K., Huang, E., Spiegel, L., Sehkon, M., Murray, J., Sheet, P., Cordes, M., Abu-Threideh, J., Stoneking, T., Kalicki, J., Graves, T., Harmon, G., Edwards, J., Latreille, P., Courtney, L., Cloud, J., Abbott, A., Scott, K., Johnson, D., Minx, P., Bentley, D., Fulton, B., Miller, N., Greco, T., Kemp, K., Kramer, J., Fulton, L., Mardis, E., Dante, M., Pepin, K., Hillier, L., Nelson, J., Spieth, J., Ryan, E., Andrews, S., Geisel, C., Layman, D., Du, H., Ali, J., Berghoff, A., Jones, K., Drone, K., Cotton, M., Joshu, C., Antonoiu, B., Zidanic, M., Strong, C., Sun, H., Lamar, B., Yordan, C., Ma, P., Zhong, J., Preston, R., Vil, D., Shekher, M., Matero, A., Shah, R., Swaby, I’K., O’Shaughnessy, A., Rodriguez, M., Hoffman, J., Till, S., Granat, S., Shohdy, N., Hasegawa, A., Hameed, A., Lodhi, M., Johnson, A., Chen, E., Marra, M., Martienssen, R., and Mc-Combie, W.R. (1999) Sequence and analysis of chromosome 4 of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature, 402, 769–777.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nei, M., and Gojobori, T. (1986) Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol., 3, 418–426.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohno, S. (1970) Evolution by Gene Duplication, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Paterson, A.H., Lan, T.-H., Reischmann, K.P., Chang, C., Lin, Y-R., Liu, S.-C., Burow, M.D., Kowalski, S.P., Katsar, C.S., Del-Monte, T.A., Feldmann, K.A., Schertz, K.F., and Wendel, J.F. (1996) Toward a unified genetic map of higher plants, transcending the monocot—dicot divergence. Nature Genet., 14, 380–382.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Raes, J., and Van de Peer, Y. (1999) ForCon: a software tool for the conversion of sequence alignments. EMBnet.news, 6 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/embnet.news/vol6_l).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Robinson-Rechavi, M., Marchand, O., Escriva, H., and Laudet, V. (2001) An ancestral whole-genome duplication may not have been responsible for the abundance of duplicated fish genes. Curr. Biol., 11, R458–R459.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Saitou, N., and Nei, M. (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol., 4, 406–425.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sankoff, D. (2001) Gene and genome duplication. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 11, 681–684.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Skrabanek, L., and Wolfe, K.H. (1998) Eukaryote genome duplication — where’s the evidence? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 8, 694–700.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Stefansky, W. (1972) Rejecting outliers in factorial designs. Technometrics, 14, 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Taylor, J.S., Van De Peer, Y., Braasch, I., and Meyer, A. (2001a) Comparative genomics provides evidence for an ancient genome duplication event in fish. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B 356, 1661–1679.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Taylor, J.S., Van de Peer, Y., and Meyer, A. (2001b) Genome duplication, divergent resolution and speciation. Trends Genet., 17, 299–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Taylor, J.S., Van de Peer, Y., and Meyer, A. (2001c) Revisiting recent challenges to the ancient fish-specific genome duplication hypothesis. Curr. Biol., 11, R1005–R1007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Terryn, N., Heijnen, L., De Keyser, A., Van Asseldonck, M., De Clercq, R., Verbakel, H., Gielen, J., Zabeau, M., Villarroel, R., Jesse, T., Neyt, P., Hogers, R., Van den Daele, H., Ardiles, W., Schueller, C., Mayer, K., Déhais, P., Rombauts, S., Van Montagu, M., Rouzé, P., and Vos, P. (1999) Evidence for an ancient chromosomal duplication in Arabidopsis thaliana by sequencing and analyzing a 400-kb contig of the APETALA2 locus on chromosome 4. FEBS Lett., 445, 237–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 4673–4680.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Van de Peer, Y., and De Wachter, R. (1994) TREECON for Windows: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment. Comput. Appl. Biosci., 10, 569–570.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Van de Peer, Y., Taylor, J.S., Braasch, I., and Meyer, A. (2001) The ghost of selection past: rates of evolution and functional divergence of anciently duplicated genes. J. Mol. Evol., 53, 436–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Van de Peer, Y., Frickey, T., Taylor, J.S., and Meyer, A. (2002) Dealing with saturation at the amino acid level: a case study based on anciently duplicated zebrafish genes. Gene, 295, 205–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vandepoele, K., Saeys, Y., Simillion, C., Raes, J., and Van de Peer, Y (2002) A new tool for the Automatic Detection of Homologous Regons (ADHoRe) and its application to microcolinearity between Arabidopsis and rice. Genome Res., in press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Vision, T.J., Brown, D.G., and Tanksley, S.D. (2000) The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science, 290, 2114–2117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, Y., and Gu, X. (2000) Evolutionary patterns of gene families generated in the early stage of vertebrates. J. Mol Evol., 51, 88–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wendel, J.F. (2000) Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Mol. Biol, 42, 225–249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wikström, N., Savolainen, V., and Chase, M.W. (2001) Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 268, 2211–2220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wolfe, K.H. (2001) Yesterday’s polyploids and the mystery of dip-loidization. Nature Rev. Genet., 2, 333–341.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang, Y.-W., Lai, K.-N., Tai, P.-Y., and Li, W.-H. (1999) Rates of nucleotide substitution in angiosperm mitochondrial DNA sequences and dates of divergence between Brassica and other angiosperm lineages. J. Mol Evol., 48, 597–604.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang, Z. (1997) PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci., 13, 555–556.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang, Z., and Nielsen, R. (2000) Estimating synonymous and non-synonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol., 17, 32–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Zeng, L.-W., Comeron, J.M., Chen, B., and Kreitman, M. (1998) The molecular clock revisited: the rate of synonymous vs. replacement change in Drosophila. Genetica, 103, 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yves Van de Peer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raes, J., Vandepoele, K., Simillion, C., Saeys, Y., Van de Peer, Y. (2003). Investigating ancient duplication events in the Arabidopsis genome. In: Meyer, A., Van de Peer, Y. (eds) Genome Evolution. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0263-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0263-9_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3957-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0263-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics