Abstract
The recent development of environmental and social reporting has been dominated by what can be termed a ‘professional’ model, which has been greatly influenced by accountancy. The central features of this model have been the annual financial report and accounts as exemplar, voluntarism in whether and how to report by organisations, and trying to ensure information quality through third party auditing and verification. However, current debates indicate that this model has a number of weaknesses, and as a generalisation is not providing stakeholders with what they want. The paper suggests an alternative model, based on more carefully defined reporting of a smaller number of indicators, with a greater regulatory involvement in ensuring information quality and a greater emphasis on third party assessment of actual performance rather than internal processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACCA (2001), Environmental, Social and Sustainability Reporting on the World Wide Web, London, 2001. Downloadable from www.accaglobal.com
Addison (2002), Death or Glory? Stakeholder Reporting 2002 — The Corporate Response, London. Downloadable from www.addison.co.uk
Bennett, M. and James, P. (eds.) (1998), Sustainable Measures, Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing
CSR Network (2001), Environmental and Social Reporting: The 2001 Benchmark Survey, Shrewsbury, UK. Executive summary downloadable from www.csrnetwork.com
Danish Environmental Protection Agency (2002), Green Accounting in Denmark, Copenhagen. Downloadable from www.mst.dk/activi/07000000.doc
Ditz, D. and Ranganathan, J. (1997), Measuring Up — Towards a Common Framework for Tracking Corporate Environmental Performance, Washington DC: World Resources Institute
Doane, S. (2002), Market Failure: The Case for Mandatory Social and Environmental Reporting, London: New Economics Foundation. Downloadable from www.neweconomics.org
DTI (2002), Business and Society — Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2002, London: Department of Trade and Industry. Downloadable from www.societyandbusiness.gov.uk
Emtairah, T. (2002), Corporate Environmental Reporting: Review of Policy Actions in Europe, Lund, Sweden: International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economies. Downloadable from www.iiiee.lu.se/information/library/publications/reports
ENDS (1993), Improving the Chemical Industry’s Performance — Lessons from the U.S.A. and Netherlands, ENDS Report, August, 16–19
Epstein, M. (1996), Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance: Best Practices for Costing and Managing an Effective Environmental Strategy, Chicago, Ill.: Irwin
ERM (2001), ERM Survey Casts Doubt Over Caring Qualities Of FTSE 100 Companies, press release, London. Downloadable from www.erm.com
European Environmental Reporting Awards (2001), Report of the Judges 2001. Downloadable from http://www.crossmedia-publishing.nl/eera3
FEE (1996), Research Paper on Expert Statements in Environmental Reports, Brussels: Federation des Experts Comptables Europeeens
FEE (2002), Providing Assurance on Sustainability Reports, Discussion Paper, Brussels: European Federation of Accountants. Downloadable from www.fee.be
Forbes.com (2002), Who Can You Trust?, Special Report. Published on-line 7 September 2002. Downloadable from www.forbes.com/2002/07/09/0709trust.html
Global Reporting Initiative (1992), Sustainability Reporting Guidelines
Hanneberg, P.,(2002), Called to Account, Tomorrow, March-April 2002.
Janus (2002), Comment, Ethical Corporation, July 2002. Downloadable from www.ethicalcorp.com
Nash, J., Nutt, J., Maxwell, J. and Ehrenfeld, J. (1992), Polaroid’s Environmental Accounting and Reporting System, Total Quality Environmental Management, Autumn, 3–15
OECD (1996), Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2001), Global Reporting Initiative — Best Practice Guide, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Sehaltegger, S. (1997): Information Costs, Quality of Information and Stakeholder Involvement, Eco-Management and Auditing, November, 87–97
Sehaltegger, S. and Burritt, R. (2000), Contemporary Environmental Accounting, Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing
Sikka, P. (2002), Dirty Business — The Unchecked Power of Major Accountancy Firms, Association for Accountancy and Business Affairs, Basildon, UK
SustainAbility and UNEP (1996), Engaging Stakeholders, 1: The Benchmark Survey, Paris, France: United Nations Environment Programme, and London, UK: SustainAbility
SustainAbility and UNEP (1997), Engaging Stakeholders: The 1997 Benchmark Survey, Paris, France: United Nations Environment Programme, and London, UK: SustainAbility
SustainAbility and UNEP (1998), Engaging Stakeholders: The Non-Reporting Report, Paris, France: United Nations Environment Programme, and London, UK: SustainAbility.
SustainAbility and UNEP (1999), The Social Reporting Report, Paris, France: United Nations Environment Programme, and London, UK: SustainAbility.
SustainAbility (2001), Virtual Sustainability — Executive Summary, London. Downloadable from www.virtualsustainability.com
US Senate, Committee on Governmental Affairs (2002), Financial Oversight of Enron: The SEC and Private-Sector Watchdogs, Washington DC. Downloadable from www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/100702watchdogsreport.pdf
Wah, L. (2002), To Report or Not to Report?, Tomorrow Hot Topics, May 2002. Downloadable from www.tomorrow-web.com
Zadek, S. (2002), Comment, Ethical Corporation, July 2002. Downloadable from www.ethicalcorp.com
Zadek, S., Pruzan, P. and Evans, R. (eds.), The Emerging Practice of Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting, London: Earthscan, 1997
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
James, P. (2003). The Professionalisation of Environmental and Social Reporting — What has it Achieved?. In: Bennett, M., Rikhardsson, P.M., Schaltegger, S. (eds) Environmental Management Accounting — Purpose and Progress. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0197-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0197-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1366-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0197-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive