Skip to main content

Cyclically Mixed Preferences—A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Transitivity of the Social Preference Relation

  • Chapter
Decision Theory and Social Ethics

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 17))

Abstract

In a series of papers several authors have given both sufficient and necessary and sufficient conditions for transitivity of the social preference relation under the simple majority decision rule. The aim of this paper is not only to introduce a new necessary and sufficient condition for transitivity of the social relation, but also to establish the connection between this condition of ‘cyclically mixed preferences’ and the well known conditions of ‘extremal restriction’, ‘value restriction’, ‘limited agreement’, and ‘dichotomous preferences’. While the latter conditions rule out the joint occurrence of certain individual preference orderings our condition excludes no individual ranking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  1. Gaertner, W., ‘Zum Problem der Existenz von Sozialen Wohlfahrtsfunktionen im Sinne von Arrow’, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 133 (1977), 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Inada, K., ‘A Note on the Simple Majority Decision Rule’, Econometrica 32 (1964), 525–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Inada, K., ‘The Simple Majority Decision Rule’, Economcirica 37(1969), 490–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saposnik, R., ‘On Transitivity of the Social Preference Relation Under Simple Majority Rule’ J. Econ. Theory 10 (1975), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sen, A. K., ‘A Possibility Theorem on Majority Decisions’,Econometrica 34 (1966), 491–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sen, A. K., Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden-Day, San Francisco, Calif., and Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sen, A. K. and Pattanaik, P. K., ‘Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Rational Choice Under Majority Decision’, J. Econ. Theory 1 (1969), 178–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gaertner, W., Heinecke, A. (1978). Cyclically Mixed Preferences—A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Transitivity of the Social Preference Relation. In: Gottinger, H.W., Leinfellner, W. (eds) Decision Theory and Social Ethics. Theory and Decision Library, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9838-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9838-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0937-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9838-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics