Abstract
It would be convenient indeed if such a contentious issue as the relationship between population and resources could be discussed in some ethically neutral manner. In recent years scientific investigations into this relationship have multiplied greatly in number and sophistication. But the plethora of scientific investigation has not reduced contentiousness; rather, it has increased it. We can venture three possible explanations for this state of affairs: (1) science is not ethically neutral; (2) there are serious defects in the scientific methods used to consider the population-resources problem; or (3) some people are irrational and fail to understand and accept scientifically established results. All of these explanations may turn out to be true, but we can afford to proffer none of them without substantial qualification. The last explanation would require, for example, a careful analysis of the concept of rationality before it could be sustained (Godelier, 1972). The second explanation would require a careful investigation of the capacities and limitations of a whole battery of scientific methods, techniques, and tools, together with careful evaluation of available data, before it could be judged correct or incorrect. In this paper, however, I shall focus on the first explanation and seek to show that the lack of ethical neutrality in science affects each and every attempt at ‘rational’ scientific discussion of the population-resources relationship. I shall further endeavor to show how the adoption of certain kinds of scientific methods inevitably leads to certain kinds of substantive conclusions which, in turn, can have profound political implications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Buchanan, K.: 1970, The Transformation of the Chinese Earth, Praeger, New York.
Cole, H. S. D., Freeman, C., Jahoda, M. and Pavitt, K. L. R.: 1973, Thinking about the Future: A Critique of the Limits to Growth, Chatto and Windus, London.
Engels, F.: 1940, The Dialectics of Nature, International Publishers,New York.
Firey, W.: 1960, Man, Mind and the Land, Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.
Glacken, C.: 1967, Traces on the Rhodian Shore, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Godelier, M.: 1972, Rationality and Irrationality in Economics, New Left Books, London.
Harvey, D.: 1973, Social Justice and the City, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.
Hays, S.: 1959, The Conservation Movement and the Gospel of Efficiency,Atheneum, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Hudson, W. D.: 1970, Modern Moral Philosophy, Macmillan, London.
Humboldt, A. von.: 1811, Essai Politique sur le Royaume de la Nouvelle Espagne, F. Schoell, Paris.
Jacks, G. V. and Whyte, R. O.: 1939, Vanishing Lands, Doubleday, New York.
Kapp, K. W.: 1950, The Social Costs of Private Enterprise, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Keynes, J. M.: 1936, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money,Harcourt Brace, New York.
Keynes, J. M.: 1951, Essays in Biography, Meridian Books, New York.
Kneese, A. V., Ayres, R. U. and D’Arge, R. C.: 1970, Economics and the Environment, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Levi-Strauss, C.: 1973, Tristes Tropiques,Atheneum, New York.
Lösch, A.: 1954, The Economics of Location, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Malthus, T. R.: 1970, An Essay on the Principle of Population and a Summary View of the Principle of Population, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middlesex.
Malthus, T. R.: 1968, Principles of Political Economy, Augustus Kelley, New York.
Marx, K.: 1963, The Poverty of Philosophy, International Publishers, New York.
Marx, K.: 1964, The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, International Publishers, New York.
Marx, K.: 1967, Capital,3 volumes, International Publishers, New York.
Marx, K.: 1971, The Grundrisse,Macmillan, London.
Marx, K.: 1972, Theories of Surplus Value, Part 3, Progress Publishers, Moscow.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. and Behrens, W. W.: 1972, The Limits to Growth,Universe Books, New York.
Mesjaros, I.: 1972, ‘Ideology and Social Science’, Socialist Register.
Mill, J. S.: 1965, Principles of Political Economy, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Oilman, B.: 1971, Alienation: Marx’s Conception of Man in Capitalist Society, Cambridge University Press, London.
Oilman, B.: 1973, ‘Marxism and Political Science: Prologomenon to a Debate on Marx’s Method’, Politics and Society 3 491–510.
Orans, M.: 1966, ‘Surplus’, Human Organization 25 24–32.
Pearson, H.: 1957, ‘The Economy Has No Surplus: A Critique of a Theory of Development’, in K. Polanyi, C. M. Arensberg, and H. W. Pearson, Trade and Market in Early Empires, Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.
Piaget, J.: 1970, Structuralism,Harper, New York.
Piaget, J.: 1972, The Principles of Genetic Epistemology, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Ricardo, D.: 195la, Principles of Political Economy, Cambridge University Press, London.
Ricardo, D.: 195lb, The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Volume 2, Cambridge University Press, London.
Sauer, C.: 1952, Agricultural Origins and Dispersals, American Geographical Society, New York.
Schmidt, A.: 1971, The Concept of Nature in Marx, New Left Books, London.
Spoehr, A.: 1956, ‘Cultural Differences in the Interpretation of Natural Resources’, in W. L. Thomas (ed.), Man’s Role in Changing the Face of the Earth, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Tarascio, V. J.: 1966, Pareto’s Methodological Approach to Economics, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Vogt, W.: 1948, The Road to Survival, W. Sloane Associates, New York.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1958, Philosophical Investigations,Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Zinke, G. W.: 1967, The Problem of Malthus: Must Progress End in Overpopulation, University of Colorado Studies, Series in Economics, No. 5, Boulder, Colorado.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harvey, D. (1979). Population, Resources, and the Ideology of Science. In: Gale, S., Olsson, G. (eds) Philosophy in Geography. Theory and Decision Library, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9394-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9394-5_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9396-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9394-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive