Skip to main content

Development Economics: Intellectual Barbarism

  • Chapter
Economics Social Institutions

Part of the book series: Rochester Studies in Economics and Policy Issues ((RSEP,volume 1))

  • 486 Accesses

Abstract

Ortega y Gasset once defined barbarism as “the absence of standards to which appeal can be made.” 1 Barbarism in the sense of an absence of intellectual standards characterizes much of contemporary development economics and, to a lesser extent, other branches of economics. Economists holding senior academic positions confuse free goods and scarce resources, systematically ignore the price-dependence of supply and demand, or neglect patent and pertinent evidence. Many of these transgressions exhibit a disregard of elementary canons of logic or an inconsistency with basic tenets of economics.

Presented at the First Annual Interlaken Seminar on Analysis and Ideology, Switzerland, June, 1974. A similar paper appears in Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, III 1975: 297–316.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. José Ortega José Gasset, The Revolt of the Masses (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1932), p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paul A. Samuelson, Economics: An Introductory Analysis, 2d ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1951), p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dan Usher, The Price Mechanism and the Meaning of National Income Statistics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gunnar Myrdal, An International Economy (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1956), p. 270.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Max F. Millikan and Walt W. Rostow, A Proposal (New York: Harper 1957), where the authors seriously propose that, if per capita incomes in an 1dc rise by between 1 and 2 percent per annum for five years, that country can be assumed to be on the point of takeoff (whatever that means) and should receive as much foreign aid as it can absorb—that is, in practice, unlimited amounts. This proposal thus treats a scarce resource as if it were a free good. Moreover, it advocates most far-reaching policies on the basis of estimates of changes in per capita incomes in ldc’s of 1 or 2 percent when in fact such statistics are subject to margins of errors of several hundred percent. The notion that changes in per capita incomes in these countries can be assessed within 1 percent reveals total unfamiliarity with conditions there.

    Google Scholar 

  6. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The Economic Development of Nigeria (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1955). The prospects of Nigerian agriculture were a main theme of the report, which reviewed a long list of factors affecting production—including, for instance, agricultural services, water supply, and plant diseases. The price received by farmers was not mentioned in the report’s list of determinants of agricultural output even though this was especially pertinent in the context, both because in Nigeria producer prices were prescribed by the official export monopolies and because the substantial costs of production and transport of export crops ensured that supply must be affected by producer prices.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gunnar Myrdal, Development and Underdevelopment (Cairo: National Bank of Egypt, 1956), pp. 63, 65 (italics in the original).

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Kitamura, “Foreign Trade Problems in Planned Economic Development,” in Economic Deevelopment with Special Reference to East Asia, ed. Kenneth Berril (London: Macmillan and Co., 1964), p. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. C. Mahalanobis, “Draft Plan Frame for the Second Five-Year Plan.” In Papers Relating to the Second Five-Year Plan (Delhi: Government of India Planning Commission, 1955), p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baran, The Political Economy of Growth (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1957), pp. 249–250; 177.

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. Potekhin, Problemsoj Economic Independence of African Countries (Moscow: Academy of Sciences, 1962), pp. 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 University of Rochester Center for Research in Government Policy and Business

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bauer, P.T. (1979). Development Economics: Intellectual Barbarism. In: Brunner, K. (eds) Economics Social Institutions. Rochester Studies in Economics and Policy Issues, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9257-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9257-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9259-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9257-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics