Skip to main content

The Evolving Systems Approach to Creative Scientific Work: Charles Darwin’s Early Thought

  • Chapter
Scientific Discovery: Case Studies

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 60))

Abstract

Scientific work and thought is not a single process but a complex group of activities organized and orchestrated toward certain ends. The diversity of approaches taken by participants in this conference — by philosophers, historians, sociologists, and psychologists interested in scientific inquiry — bears witness not only to controversy but to the multifaceted complexity of the scientific enterprise.

An earlier version of this paper was given as a series of lectures at the International Symposium on Evolution, Liblice, Czechoslovakia, June 5–9, 1978. I thank Rachel Falmagne for a critical reading and helpful comments on a draft of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An earlier version of this paper was given as a series of lectures at the International Symposium on Evolution, Liblice, Czechoslovakia, June 5–9, 1978. I thank Rachel Falmagne for a critical reading and helpful comments on a draft of this paper.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Howard E. Gruber, Darwin on Man: A Psychological Study of Scientific Creativity, together with Darwin’s Early and Unpublished Notebooks, transcribed and edited by Paul H. Barrett, New York: Dutton, 1974; 2nd Edition, University of Chicago Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A• I. Oparin, The Origin of Life, New York: Dover Press, 1953 (first published in Russian, 1936 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jean Piaget and Barbel Inhelder, La Psychologie de I’Enfant, Paris: Presses Univer- sitaires de France, 1975. See also Η. E. Gruber and J. J. Von£che, flexions sur les орёгайопв formelles de la репвёе, Archives de Psychologie 44 (1976), 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charles Darwin, The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882, with original omissions restored, edited by his granddaughter, Nora Barlow, London: Collins, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charles Darwin, Charles Darwins Diary of the Voyage of Η. M. S. Beagle edited from the MS by Nora Barlow, Cambridge University Press, 1934. This passage was written on February 28, 1832.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Extracts from first Notebook on Transmutation of Species, pp. 18-22, published in Gruber and Barrett, op. cit. I have added some punctuation.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Howard Nemerov, Figures of Thought, Boston: David R. Godine, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martin J. S. Rudwick, Historical analogies in the geological work of Charles Lyell, Janus 64 (1977), 89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paul McReynolds, The Clock Metaphor in the History of Psychology. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Norton Wise, The mutual embrace of electricity and magnetism, Science 203 (1979), 1310–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. For a fuller discussion, see Howard E. Gruber, Darwin’s tree of nature and other images of wider scope, in J. Wechsler (ed.), On Aesthetics in Science, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Michael Ruse, Ought philosophers of science consider scientific discovery? A Dar-winian case study. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Howard E. Gruber, The Fortunes of a Basic Darwinian Idea: Chance, in R. W. Rieber and K. Salzinger (eds.), Psychology. Theoretical-Historical Perspectives, New York: Academic Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Howard E. Gruber, Сгёайуйё et fonction constructive de la гёрёййоп, Bulletin de Psychologie de I’Universiti de Paris 30 (1976-77), 235–239.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Additional case studies similar in character to the approach outlined here include: Rudolph Arnheim, The Genesis of a Painting, Picasso’s Guernica, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962; Frederick L. Holmes, Claude Bernard and Animal Chemistry, Harvard University Press, 1974; and Martin Rudwick, Darwin and Glen Roy: A Great Failure in Scientific Method?, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science S (1974), 97–185.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gruber, H.E. (1980). The Evolving Systems Approach to Creative Scientific Work: Charles Darwin’s Early Thought. In: Nickles, T. (eds) Scientific Discovery: Case Studies. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 60. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9015-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9015-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1093-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9015-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics