Abstract
The debate, some fifteen years ago, on the logic of scientific discovery, did not lead to any definitive or generally accepted solution. Yet it did sharpen some of the issues involved. Both the logical positivists and their erstwhile opponent, Karl Popper, insisted that scientific discovery was outside the scope of logic.1 N. R. Hanson’s vociferous opposition seems, in retrospect, more a rhetoric about the need for a logic of discovery than a developed logic.2 Though the process of scientific discovery, especially when rationally reconstructed, inevitably evidences some structural relation between the originating question and the eventual answer, the relation definitely does not seem to be logical in the sense of being governed by formal rules of general import.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Blackwell, Richard: 1966, Discovery in the Physical Sciences, Univ. of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.
Hanle, P. Α.: 1977α, ‘The Coming of Age of Erwin Schrodinger: His Quantum Statistics of Ideal Gases’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 17, 165–192.
Hanle, P. Α.: 19776, ‘Erwin Schrödinger’s Reaction to Louis de Broglie’s Thesis on the Quantum Theory’, Isis 68, 606–609.
Hanle, P. Α.: forthcoming, ‘The Schrödinger-Einstein Correspondence and the Sources of Wave Mechanics’, American Journal of Physics.
Hanson, N. R.: 1958a, “The Logic of Discovery”, Journal of Philosophy 60, 1073–1089.
Hanson, N. R.: 19586, Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Hanson, N. R.: 1961, ‘Is There a Logic of Scientific Discovery?’, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 20–35.
Koestler, Arthur: 1964, The Act of Creation, Macmillan, New York.
Kordig, Carl R.: 1978, ‘Discovery and Justification’, Philosophy of Science 45, 110–117.
Krantz, D. H., et al.i 1971, Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I: Additive and Polynomial Representations, Academic Press, New York.
Kuhn, T. S., et al. (eds.): 1968, Sources for the History of Quantum Physics: An Inventory and Report, Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia.
MacKinnon, Edward: 1975, ‘Discussion: A Reinterpretation of Harm’s Copernican Revolution’, Philosophy of Science 42, 67–79.
MacKinnon, Edward: 1976, ‘De Broglie’s Thesis: A Critical Retrospective’, American Journal of Physics 44, 1047–1055.
MacKinnon, Edward: 1977, ‘Heisenberg, Models, and the Rise of Matrix Mechanics’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 8, 137–188.
MacKinnon, Edward: forthcoming a, ‘The Rise and Fall of the Schrödinger Interpretation’, in P. Suppes (ed.), Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: The 1976 Stanford Seminar.
MacKinnon, Edward: forthcoming b, Scientific Explanation and Atomic Physics, Vol. I: Historical Development.
Popper, Karl R.: 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Science Editions, New York.
Stuewer, R. H.: 1975, The Compton Effect: Turning Point in Physics, Science History Publications, New York.
Wessels, Linda: 1975, Schrödinger’s Interpretation of Wave Mechanics, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, available from University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Wessels, Linda: 1977, ‘Schrodinger’s Route to Wave Mechanics’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 10, 311–340.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
MacKinnon, E. (1980). The Discovery of a New Quantum Theory. In: Nickles, T. (eds) Scientific Discovery: Case Studies. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 60. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9015-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9015-9_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1093-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9015-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive