Abstract
“Dogmatism” (in a non-invidious sense) is an ancient term for the view that judgment is and ought to be a matter of assertion and denial, of belief (Greek, “dogma”) and disbelief. Probabilism is a relatively recent view, urged in the mid-17th century, that judgment isn’t or shouldn’t generally be a matter of believing but of — what to call it? — probabilizing. Will it rain today? I don’t know; I’m not in a position to assert or deny it. But still I may have an action-guiding probabilistic judgment, e.g., my odds on rain might be 7: 3, my probability for rain might be 70%.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carnap, Rudolf. (1950, 1962) Logical Foundations of Probability. University of Chicago Press.
Field, Hartry. (1978) ‘A Note on Jeffrey Conditionalization.’ Philosophy of Science 45, 361–367.
Jeffrey, Richard. (1975) ‘Carnap’s Empiricism.’ Induction, Probability, and Confirmation, ed. Grover Maxwell and Robert M. Anderson, Jr. University of Minnesota Press.
Jeffrey, Richard. (1965) The Logic of Decision. McGraw-Hill. Second edition, revised: University of Chicago Press, 1983.
Lewis, David. (1979) ‘Prisoners’ Dilemma is a Newcomb Problem.’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 8, 235–240.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jeffrey, R. (1988). How to Probabilize a Newcomb Problem. In: Fetzer, J.H. (eds) Probability and Causality. Synthese Library, vol 192. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3997-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3997-4_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-052-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3997-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive