Abstract
In the course of preparing this comment I have come to realize that a large proportion of my philosophy-of-science classes, both as a student and as a teacher, have been devoted, in one way or another, to the discussion of Professor Hempel’s numerous papers. Contemporary philosophy of science is, to some extent, a comment on Hempel’s work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Hempel, “Studies in the Logic of Confirmation,” in: C. G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York: The Free Press, 1965, pp. 3–52.
C. G. Hempel, “The Theoretician’s Dilemma: A Study in the Logic of Theory Construction,” in: C. G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York: The Free Press, 1965, pp. 173–228.
J. English, “Partial Interpretation and Meaning Change,” The Journal of Philosophy 75 (1978): 57–76.
M. Katz, “Real-Valued Models with Metric Equality and Uniformly Continuous Predicates,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (1982): 772–792.
M. Katz, “The Logic of Approximation in Quantum Theory,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1982): 215–228.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ben-Menachem, Y. (1988). Limits of a Deductive Construal of the Function of Scientific Theories. In: Ullmann-Margalit, E. (eds) Science in Reflection. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 110. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2957-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2957-9_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2713-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2957-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive