Abstract
Judging by articles in the scientific press, an issue of increasing concern to observers of the scientific enterprise is the politicization of science. There is, quite naturally, concern that good science is undermined when political agendas and ideological alignments begin to exercise an influence over the funding of scientific research.1 Historians and sociologists of science have traditionally assured us that such influences are at best fleeting; the real momentum of science, we are told, is provided by its technical culture and by the exigencies of the investigative path, and these will ultimately prevail. But is the development of science in fact so immune from the external pressures of its environment? Might not “good science” be part of a seamless web of political and economic institutions sustained by sets of value orientations and ideologies?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
For an overview see Michael Gibbons and Björn Wittrock, eds., Science as a Commodity: Threats to the Open Community of Scholars Essex: Longman, 1985.
Paul F. Cranefield, “The Organic Physics of 1847 and the Biophysics of Today” Journal of the History of Medicine 12 (1957): 407–423.
Gerald L. Geison, Michael Foster and the Cambridge School of Physiology. The Scientific Enterprise in Late Victorian Society Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978, p. 25.
Joseph Ben-David, The Scientist’s Role in Society: A Comparative Study Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1971.
Joseph Ben-David, “Scientific Growth: A Sociological View,” Minerva 2 (1963): 455–476.
Joseph Ben-David and Awraham Zloczower, “Universities and Academic Systems in Modern Societies ”European Journal of Sociology 3 (1962): 45–84, especially 54–57.
Joseph Ben-David, “Scientific Productivity and Academic Organization in 19th Century Medicine,” American Sociological Review 25 (1960): 828–843.
Joseph Ben-David and Randall Collins, “Social Factors in the Origins of a New Science: The Case of Psychology,” American Sociological Review 31 (1968): 451–465.
See especially Magali S. Larson, The Rise of Professionalism Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977, pp. xii-xiv.
Elliot Freidson, The Profession of Medicine New York, Dodd and Mead, 1970.
Emil Du Bois-Reymond, Jugendbriefe an Eduard Hallmann Berlin, 1918 (hereafter cited as Hallmann), pp. 75–76.
Gustav Karsten, Die Fortschritte der Physik 1 (1845): vii-ix.
See Friedrich Herneck, “Emil Du Bois-Reymond und die Grenzen der mechanistischen Naturauffassung,”in: Forschen und Wirken. Festschrift zur 150-Jahr-Feier der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin 1810–1960 Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag, 1960, pp. 229–251.
Peter Borscheid, Naturwissenschaft, Staat und Industrie in Baden (1818–1914), Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1976.
See Gordon Craig, The Politics of the Prussian Army 1640–1945 Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955.
Michael Sturmer, Das ruhelose Reich. Deutschland 1866–1918 Berlin: Severin und Siedler, 1983.
Werner Schunke, Diepreussischen Freihändler und die Entstehung der Nationalliberalen Partei, Leipzig, 1916: pp. 46–47.
Rudolph Virchow, Über die nationale Entwicklung und Bedeutung der Naturwissenschaften, Berlin: 1865, p. 20.
See also Heinrich Schipperges, Weltbild und Wissenschaft. Eröffnungsreden zu den Naturforscherversammlungen 1822 bis 1972, Hildesheim: Gerstenberg Verlag, 1976, pp. 36–51.
Hermann von Helmholtz, “Über das Verhältniss der Naturwissenschaften zur Gesammtheit der Wissenschaften,” in: Vorträge und Reden Braunschweig: 1903, Vol. 1, pp. 180–181.
Hermann Baumgarten, “Der deutsche Liberalismus. Eine Selbstkritik” (1866), in: Historische und politische Aufsätze und Reden Strasbourg: 1894, pp. 76–216, especially p. 191.
E. Du Bois-Reymond, “Aus den Tagen des Norddeutschen Bundes,” in: Reden, 2 vols., Leipzig: 1912, Vol. 2, pp. 351–352.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lenoir, T. (1988). Social Interests and the Organic Physics of 1847. In: Ullmann-Margalit, E. (eds) Science in Reflection. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 110. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2957-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2957-9_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2713-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2957-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive