Skip to main content

Combining Classical and Intuitionistic Logic

Or: Intuitionistic Implication as a Conditional

  • Chapter
Frontiers of Combining Systems

Part of the book series: Applied Logic Series ((APLS,volume 3))

Abstract

We study how a logic C+J conbining classical logic C and intuitionistic logic J can be defined. We show that its Hilbert axiomatization cannot be attained by simply extending the union of the axiomatizations of C and J by so called interaction axioms. Such a logic would collapse into classical logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • L. Catach (1988), Normal multimodal logics. Proc. Nat. Conf. on AI (AAAI-88), pp 491–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Chellas (1975), Basic conditional logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 4, pp 133–153.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • M. Fitting (1983), Proof methods for modal and intuitionistic logics. Synthese Library, Vol. 169, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • D. Gabbay (1996), Labelled Deductive Systems. Oxford University Press, to appear.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • L. Humberstone (1979), Interval semantics for tense logic: some remarks. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, pp 171–196.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • M. Kracht (1993), How completeness and correspondence theory got married. In: M. de Rijke (ed.), Diamonds and Defaults. Synthese, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kripke (1965), Semantical analysis of intuitionistic logic, I. In: J. N. Crossley, M. A. E. Dummet (eds.), Formal systems and recursive functions. Amsterdam, North Holland Publishing Co., pp 92–129.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • D. Ladner (1977), The computational complexity of provability in systems of modal propositional logic. SIAM J. Computing 3, pp. 467–480.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • D. Nute (1980), Topics in conditional logic. Philosophical Studies Series, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • D. Nute (1984), Conditional logic. In Dov M. Gabbay and Franz Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Statman (1979), Intuitionistic propositional logic is polynomial-space complete. Theoretical Computer Science 9, pp 67–72.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

del Cerro, L.F., Herzig, A. (1996). Combining Classical and Intuitionistic Logic. In: Baader, F., Schulz, K.U. (eds) Frontiers of Combining Systems. Applied Logic Series, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0349-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0349-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6643-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0349-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics