Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 35))

  • 146 Accesses

Abstract

It probably is uncontroversial that the determiner cliticization paradigm discussed in this chapter obeys some locality restriction in terms of government (or a similar notion). Whether the locality condition is syntactic or phonological in nature may be an open question, but I have nothing to say about the second possibility.

I thank Carlos Otero, my commentator, for his reaction, and Robert Freidin, Elena Herburger, and Richard Kayne for their comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez, R., X.L. Regueira, H. Monteagudo (1986) Gramatica Galega, Galaxia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1986) Barriers, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1992) “A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory,” MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corver, N. and D. Delfitto (1993) “Feature Asymmetry and the Nature of Pronoun Movement,” presented at GLOW, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. (1982) Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, UMass Ph.D. thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herburger, E. (1993) “Focus and NP Quantification,” presented at SALT III, University of California at Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1987) “The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory,” Linguistic Inquiry 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laka, I. (1990) Negation in Syntax. On The Nature of Functional Categories and Projections, Ph.D. thesis, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn, Alan (1993) Topics in The Syntax and Semantics of Coordinate Structures, Ph.D. thesis, UMD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T. (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure, MIT Ph.D. thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uriagereka, J. (1988) On Government, UConn Ph.D. thesis, distributed in (1993) through MITWPL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uriagereka, J. (1992) “A Focus Position in Western Romance,” presented at GLOW, Lisbon, CAP In Kiss (ed.). (1995) Discourse Configurational Languages, Studies in Comparative Grammar, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uriagereka, J. (1995) “Aspects of Clitic Placement in Western Romance,” to appear in Linguistic Inquiry 26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Uriagereka, J. (1996). A Brief Response. In: Freidin, R. (eds) Current Issues in Comparative Grammar. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 35. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0135-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0135-3_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3779-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0135-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics