Abstract
Tree islands occupy a small but distinctive portion of the Everglades landscape. They support high plant species diversity, provide habitat and wet-season refuges for upland species, and are essential nesting habitat for a variety of wetland reptiles and birds. Tree islands in the central Everglades have been dramatically altered during the past century, with drought, wildfire and prolonged high water identified as principle causes of damage to island vegetation and soils. Likewise, future changes in water management will surely affect these tree islands. Presently there is a lack of baseline biological data and of quantitative measures that can be used to predict the ecological response of tree islands to different hydrologic scenarios. This chapter reports on a study of plant communities occupying elevated tree islands in central Everglades water conservation areas 3A and 3B (WCA-3A and -3B). The study’s aims were, first, to obtain a baseline description of tree island vegetation; and second, to identify hydrologic correlates of vegetation that can provide tentative predictions of the ecological response of tree islands to future changes in water management. During 1997-1999, we collected data on plant species composition and vegetation cover from transects on 27 elevated tree islands in WCA-3A and WCA-3B. We also calculated island areas from 1994 aerial photographs and estimated maximum island elevation relative to the surrounding marsh. Historic hydrological conditions were estimated using output from the South Florida Water Management Model (v 3.5) for the years 1979 to 1995. Tree islands in our sample average 1.0 m in maximum height relative to surrounding slough bottoms, ranging from 0.25-1.6 m. The spatial extent of tree and shrub vegetation averages 18 ha per island, but varies over two orders of magnitude (0.3-260 ha). However, the area of an island that exceeds -0.5 m in height is typically less than 0.1 ha. A total of 147 species were identified in vegetation transects, including 43 species of trees and shrubs. Islands in the driest northern zone of WCA-3A were the most distinctive subgroup, with smaller areas of woody and upland vegetation, little or no sawgrass-and-shrub “tail,” reduced tree and shrub species richness, and limited or no canopy cover. These differences are most likely a consequence of drought and peat-consuming wildfires that have destroyed both trees and soils on islands throughout northern WCA-3A. Stepwise regression analysis identified hydrologic predictors for several vegetation variables, including species richness, woody vegetation cover, and island area. The strongest association was between three hydrologic predictors — a measure of low groundwater depths, frequency of island flooding and marsh hydroperiod - that together accounted for 81% of the variance in tree and shrub species richness on WCA-3A tree islands. Our results suggest that a diverse community of woody species can be supported by a hydrologic regime that prevents prolonged flooding of upland portions of islands while providing sufficient depths and hydroperiods to maintain soil moisture and prevent peat fires. Quantitative analysis thus confirms interpretations by previous authors based on smaller data sets and field observations, and provides suggestions for some specific hydrologic variables that could be used to evaluate future water management scenarios.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, T. R. and Crook A. G. 1975. South Florida ecological study, Appendix G. Recent and long–term vegetation changes and patterns in south Florida Part II: Final report. Report to the National Park Service. May 1975.
Craighead, F. C. 1971 The Trees of South Florida. Volume 1. The Natural Environments and their Succession. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press
Davis, J. H. 1946. The peat deposits of Florida: Their occurrence, development, and uses. Geological Bulletin No. 30. Florida Department of Conservation.
Dineen, J. W. 1972. Life in the tenacious Everglades. West Palm Beach, FL: Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District. In Depth Report 1(5).
Dineen, J. W. 1974. Examination of water management alternatives in Conservation Area 2A. West Palm Beach, FL: Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District. In Depth Report. 2(3).
Gordon, N. D., McMahon, T. A. and Finlayson, B. L. 1992. Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
Guerra, R. E. 1996. Impacts of the high water period of 1994–1995 on tree islands in water conservation areas. In: Armentano, T. V. ed. Proceedings of the Conference: Ecological Assessment of the 1994–1995 High Water Conditions in the Southern Everglades, August 22–23, 1996. Homestead, FL: National Park Service, Everglades National Park, pp. 47–58.
Loveless, C. M. 1959. A study of the vegetation in the Florida Everglades. Ecology 40: 1–9.
McPherson, B. F. 1973. Vegetation in Relation to Water Depth in Conservation Area 3, Florida. Tallahassee, FL: US Geological Survey. Open File Report No. 73025.
Nelson, G. 1996. The Shrubs and Woody Vines of Florida: A Reference and Field Guide. Sarasota, FL: Pineapple Press, Inc.
Olmsted, I. C. and Armentano, T. V. 1997. Vegetation of Shark Slough, Everglades National Park. Homestead, FL: South Florida Natural Resources Center. Report 97–001.
Olmsted, I. C. and Loope, L. L. 1984. Plant communities of Everglades National Park. In: Gleason, P. J. ed. Environments of South Florida Present and Past II. Coral Gables, FL: Miami Geological Society, pp. 169–184.
Pedhazur, E. J. 1982. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Price, C., Wolverton, J., & Richards, T. 1999. Water resources data, Florida water year 1998. Vol. 2A, South Florida surface water, water–data report FL–98–2A. Miami, FL: U.S. Geological Survey.
Schortemeyer, J. L. 1980. An Evaluation of Water Management Practices for Optimum Wildlife Benefits in Conservation Area 3A. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission.
Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th ed. Ames, I A: Iowa State University Press.
South Florida Water Management District. 1999. A Primer to the South Florida Water Management Model (Version 3.5). West Palm Beach, FL: South Florida Water Management District, Hydrologic Systems Modeling Division, April 1999.
US Army Corps of Engineers. 1999. Central and Southern Florida Comprehensive Review Study. Final Integrated Feasibility Report and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. Jacksonville, FL: United States Army Corps of Engineers, April, 1999.
Worth, D. 1988. Environmental Response ofWCA–2A to Reduction in Regulation Schedule and Marsh Drawdown. West Palm Beach FL: South Florida Water Management District. Technical Publication #88–2.
Wunderlin, R. P. 1998. Guide to the Vascular Plants of Florida. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
Zaffke, M. 1983. Plant Communities of Water Conservation Area 3A: Base–line Documentation Prior to the Operation of S–338 and S–340. West Palm Beach FL: South Florida Water Management District Technical Memorandum DRE–164.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heisler, L., Towles, D.T., Brandt, L.A., Pace, R.T. (2002). Tree Island Vegetation and Water Management in the Central Everglades. In: Sklar, F.H., Van Der Valk, A. (eds) Tree Islands of the Everglades. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0001-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0001-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6490-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0001-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive