Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Scientific Name
Hardenbergia violacea (Schneev.) Stearn
Synonyms
Glycine violacea Schneev., Hardenbergia monophylla (Vent.) Benth., Kennedia monphylla Vent.
Family
Fabaceae.
Common/English Names
Climbing Morning Glory, False Sarsaparilla, Happy Wanderer, Native Lilac, Purple Coral, Purple Coral Pea, Native Sarsaparilla, Native Woodrose, Purple Twining Pea, Sarsaparilla.
Vernacular Names
-
Australia: Waraburra (Kattang Aborigines)
-
United States: Lilac Vine, Mexican Lilac Vine
Origin/Distribution
The species is native to Australia, growing in areas from Queensland to Tasmania. It has been introduced to the United States where it is grown as landscape plants.
Agroecology
In Australia the species is found in many habitats, growing widespread along the coast and adjacent ranges in the eastern and southern states on the mainland. It grows in coastal heath and forest and inland in drier eucalypt forests. In Tasmania, it is deemed as endangered, as it is only known from two small natural populations, on private land.
The species is moderately frost tolerant down to 0 to −5 °C and moderately drought tolerant. It thrives in areas with 400–2,400 m mean annual rainfall in summer or winter, mean annual temperature range of 10–21 °C, and tolerates a summer maximum of 33 °C. It grows best in full sun but tolerates light shade in well-drained acidic (<pH 6.5) clay loam, loam, sandy loam or sandy clay loam soils. It is intolerant of salinity.
Botany
A hardy, evergreen, climbing or prostrate, glabrous subshrub with slender, woody stem growing to 2 m long. Leaf simple, ovate-narrow-lanceolate 3–10 cm by 1–5 cm wide, glabrous, dark green above, grey green beneath, leathery, margin entire, venation distinctly reticulate, tip mucronate, base rounded to indented (Plates 1 and 2), petiole 0.5–3 cm long, stipels 1–2 mm long, filiform. Inflorescence axillary, racemose panicle with 20–30 violet or reddish flowers, each axillary unit of 3 flowers with a subtending bract. Calyx 3–4 mm long with two dorsal sepals fully and the rest joined ¾ length; corolla 8 mm long, with violet purple (or red) standard with 2 yellowish white spots at the base, lateral wings on long yellow claw, violet purple and keel also violate purple or red (Plates 1, 2 and 3); stamens 9 joined into a tube and 1 free, diadelphous; ovary 3–3.5 mm long. Pod flattened oblong, 35–50 mm long, glabrous, dark brown to black. Seeds 4–8, reinform, 2.5–3 mm, olive green to brown, strophiolate.
Nutritive/Medicinal Properties
Percentage distribution in H. violacea pods and seeds of mineral nutrients respectively were as follows: Na, 57.5 %, 42.5 %; Fe, 56.2 %, 43.8 %; K, 50 %, 50 %; Ca, 49.7 %, 50.3 %; Mn, 46.9 %, 53.1 %; Cl, 37.7 %, 62.3 %; Zn, 39.7 %, 60.3 %; Cu, 37.6 %, 62.4 %; S, 28.9 %, 71.15; Mg, 26.1 %, 73.9 %; N, 10 %, 90 %; and P, 5.7 %, 94.3 % (Hocking and Kortt 1987).
Concentrations (per g dry weight) of minerals in the elaiosome, testa and embryo of the seed were reported, respectively, as dry matter, 2.6 mg, 32.5 mg, 20.6 mg; N, 31.55 mg, 2.14 mg, 86.90 mg; P, 0.72 mg, 0.74 mg, 4.36 mg; K, 5.91 mg, 8.84 mg, 16.15 mg; S, 1.14 mg, 0.91 mg, 4.27 mg; Ca, 0.84 mg, 2.53 mg, 1,61 mg; Mg, 0.50 mg, 1.41 mg, 2.08 mg; Cl, 0.50 mg, 0.38 mg, 0.46 mg; Na, 145.0 μg, 200 μg, 102 μg; Fe, 38.4 μg, 34 μg, 55.2 μg; Zn, 18.4 μg, 26.1 μg, 58.7 μg: Mn, 53.6 μg, 45.7 μg, 23 μg; and Cu, 2.76 μg, 2 μg, 18.85 μg. The fatty acid compositions of elaiosomes and mature seeds were, respectively: lauric, (12:0) 0.13 %, 0; myristic, (14:0) 0.46 %, ): palmitic, (16:0) 21.93 %, 12.1 %; palmitoleic, (16:1) 2.55 %, 0; stearic, (18:0) 5.26 %, 5.1 %; oleic, (18:0) 60.62 %, 23.2 %; linoleic, (18:2) 7.54 % 55.9 %; g-linolenic, (18:3) and a-linoleic, (18:3) 1.22 %, 3.0 %; and elaidic acid, (20:0) 0.29 %, 0. The amino acid composition [nmol amino acid (per mg dry weight meal)] of elaiosomes and dehulled seeds were, respectively: lysine, 21, 28.8; histidine, 6.5,10.3; arginine, 37.7, 24.0; aspartic acid, 49.9,44.49; threonine, 15.3,21.9; serine, 18.4, 29.6, glutamic acid, 30.8, 74.0; proline, 18.8, 23; glycine, 33.1, 43.2; alanine, 23.1, 31.2; half-cystine, 3.8, 6.3;valine, 17.3, 22.4; methionine, 2.6, 5.0; isoleucine, 15.5, 15.5; leucine, 28.1, 34.1; tyrosine, 11.1, 13.1;phenylalanine, 15.9, 17.7; and canavanine 4.0, 47.
As seen from the above, the seeds accumulated about 50 % of the dry matter of a mature fruit; over 90 % of its N and P content; 50–75 % of its K, Ca, Mn, Cl, S, Zn, Cu and Mg, but less than 50 % of its Fe and Na (Hocking and Kortt 1987). Seeds contained higher levels of most nutrients than pods. The testa comprised 60 % of the dry matter content of a seed and contained the major proportion of its Ca, Mg, Cl, Na and Mn; the embryo contained most of the seed’s contents of N, P, K, S, Zn and Cu. The elaiosomes had less than 5 % of the seed’s dry matter and mineral nutrient content. The oil content of the elaiosome was 34 %, compared to 12 % for the embryo. Oleic acid made up over 60 % of the fatty acid content of elaiosome oil. Aspartic acid, arginine and glycine were the predominant amino acids in the elaiosome. The embryo contained 10 % of the non-protein antimetabolic amino acid, canavanine, the elaiosome only 1 %. The subunit protein compositions of the elaiosome and embryo were different. Earlier, Rivett et al. (1983) reported that Hardenbergia violacea had a chemical composition which may have the potential for human food. The fatty acid composition of the elaiosome was quite different from that of the dehulled seed (Rivett et al. 1983) in that the predominant fatty acid of the seed was linoleic acid versus oleic acid in the elaiosome.
Concentrations (per g dry weight) of minerals in the leaves at 94 days after flower anthesis were as follows: N, 27.95 mg; P, 0.87 mg; K, 12.10 mg; S, 1.64 mg; Ca, 9.40 mg; Mg, 1.93 mg; Na, 0.29 mg; Cl, 0.74 mg; Fe, 190 μg; Zn, 26.4 μg; Mn, 180.8 μg; and Cu, 7.8 μg (Hocking and Kortt 1987).
The plant has been reported to be used in bush medicine as a tonic drink (Cribb and Cribb 1976; Haslam 2011).
Other Uses
A grey-blue dye is obtained from the flowers (Cribb and Cribb 1982).
Comments
The plant is readily propagated from seeds.
Selected References
Cribb AB, Cribb JW (1976) Wild food in Australia. Fontana Collins, Sydney, 240 pp
Cribb AB, Cribb JW (1982) Useful wild plants in Australia. Fontana Collins, Sydney, 269 pp
Facciola S (1990) Cornucopia. A source book of edible plants. Kampong Publications, Vista, 677 pp
Haslam S (2011) Noosa’s native plants, 3rd edn. Noosa Integrated Catchment Association, Tewantin, 392 pp
Hocking PJ, Kortt AA (1987) Growth and nutrient accumulation by fruits of the perennial legume, Hardenbergia violacea, with special reference to myrmecochory. New Phytol 105:89–102
Kunkel G (1984) Plants for human consumption. An annotated checklist of the edible phanerogams and ferns. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein
Lazarus E, Lawrence N, Potts W (2003) Threatened flora of Tasmania. Threatened species Unit DPIWE, Tasmania. Online http://www.dpiw.tas.gov.au/ThreatenedFloraCD/. Accessed Sept 2011
Leber BA (1977) Wildflowers of South-Eastern Queensland, vol 1. Botany Branch, Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane
National Herbarium of New South Wales (2008) PlantNET – Flora of New South Wales. Online http://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/floraonline.htm. Accessed: Sept 2011
Rivett DE, Tucker DJ, Jones GP (1983) The chemical composition of seeds from some Australian plants. Aust J Agric Res 34(4):427–432
Tucker SC (2006) Floral ontogeny of Hardenbergia violacea (Fabaceae : Faboideae : Phaseoleae) and taxa of tribes Bossiaeeae and Mirbelieae, with emphasis on presence of pseudoraceme inflorescences. Aust Syst Bot 19:193–210
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lim, T.K. (2014). Hardenbergia violacea. In: Edible Medicinal And Non-Medicinal Plants. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7395-0_65
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7395-0_65
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7394-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7395-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)