Abstract
Several advances have been made on the understanding of the biotic and environmental history of South America and Antarctica including the discovery of additional fossil sites coupled with progress from multidisciplinary analyses encompassing tectonic, isotopic, and radiochemical dating and molecular studies in modern forms. This also changed the knowledge about birds. Characters of the South American (SAn) avian fossil record are: (1) presence of taxa with uncertain affinities and the absence of Passeriformes during the Paleogene; (2) progressive and accelerated increase of species starting at the Neogene (Miocene); (3) dispersal of important extinct lineages (e.g. Phorusrhacidae, Teratornithidae) to North America after the connection between both Americas; (4) scarce endemic species that are members of clades with major diversification during the Neogene (e.g., Cariamiformes) or that inhabit mainly in the southern hemisphere (e.g., Anhingidae); (5) highly diverse living groups with limited (e.g., Passeriformes) or none (e.g., Apodiformes) fossil record, which stem groups are registered in Europe; (6) absence of the most extant SAn bird lineages; and (7) predominance of the zoophagous birds (>60 %) in all the associations (13) under scrutiny. Changes in diversity of the SAn birds during the Cenozoic could have been the result of the action of different processes (dispersal, vicariance, extirpations, or extinctions) that affect groups in different ways.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Modern birds are represented by two big lineages, the Palaeognathae (Tinamiformes + Ratitae) and the Neognathae (Galloanserae + Neoaves) (Mindell and Brown 2005). Fowl and waterfowl (Galloanserae) represent the earliest divergence among neognaths (Fain and Houde 2004) (Fig. 1.1). Both clades sum approximately 10,000 species of which 60 % are Passeriformes (the most diverse clade of terrestrial vertebrates). A comparison between the past and the present reveals a complex and hallmarked evolutionary and biogeographic history which would have begun over 65 million years ago (Tambussi 2011).
The origin of living bird lineages has long been the subject of some controversy. Did living bird lineages originate after the extinction of nonavian dinosaurs at the Cretaceous–Paleogene limit (K-Pg, better known as Cretaceous-Tertiary or K/T boundary)? Or did members of these lineages coexisted with nonavian dinosaurs and survived this great mass extinction event? Whereas the data from biogeography and molecular sequencing argue in favor of the coexistence option, the fossil evidence refutes it, placing the “Big Bang” of avian radiation after the K-Pg boundary (Fig. 1.2). This latter hypothesis is based on two facts: firstly, most lineages of living birds appear in strata from about 11 to 20 million years ago following the great extinction event at the end of the Mesozoic, and second there are no Cretaceous fossils remains that can be assigned with certainty to the Neornithes. This scenario was greatly modified some years ago by the finding of a partial skeleton belonging to a new species of Anseriformes named Vegavis iaai, about 71 million years old (late Cretaceous, Maastrichtian), from Antarctica, that could be analyzed in a phylogenetic context (Clarke et al. 2005, 2006). From that moment, at least the lineages that include the living screamers, some very primitive geese and the true ducks (Anseriformes), and the close relatives of pheasants and hens (Galliformes) are said to have coexisted with nonavian dinosaurs. This was the first fossil evidence that definitely placed the radiation of modern birds in the Cretaceous. After the K-Pg, the Cenozoic was undoubtedly dominated by mammals and Neornithes birds. Be enough it to say that by the early Oligocene (~35 million years ago), most of the orders of birds that we recognize today had appeared. During recent decades, a great increase in paleornithological information, especially from Miocene through Pleistocene deposits, has become available but knowledge about South American Paleogene birds is almost stagnant. No small bird remains have been recorded so far.
It is quite complicated characterize the effect of environmental changes on bird communities during the South American Cenozoic. In a recent paper, Tambussi (2011) interpreted the paleoenvironmental, paleoecological, and faunal conditions of the Cenozoic using the four most complete bird assemblages recovered from Neogene sediments of Patagonia and the Pampean region. In this work, we summarized the record of land-bird, the paleoenvironmental changes of South America and Antarctica through Cenozoic, emphasizing the relationships between biomes and the geological forces that, through different climatic-environmental factors, have driven its evolution. We increase the area of interest to South America and Antarctica. The focal point of this analysis is on terrestrial or arboreal birds but some considerations on aquatic (continental or marine) birds are made.
The temporal focus is on Paleocene–Pliocene fossils but Paleogene avifaunas are poorly known, whereas Neogene (at least Miocene to Pliocene) avifauna has an essentially modern higher level composition. The information came from both our own examination of fossils and the literature review. The data, however, are not homogeneous, since some temporal gaps without, or with only very scanty, information occurs.
Abbreviations
- AMNH:
-
American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, EEUU
- BAR:
-
Museo Asociación Paleontológica Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina
- BMNH:
-
Natural History Museum, London, UK
- FM:
-
Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, EEUU
- MACN:
-
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- MLP:
-
Museo de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- MPEF-PV:
-
Museo Paleontológico “Egidio Feruglio”, Trelew, Chubut, Argentina
- MPM-PV:
-
Museo Padre Molina, Río Gallegos, Santa Cruz, Argentina
- YPM-PU:
-
Peabody Museum of Natural History, New Haven, Connecticut, EEUU
References
Clarke JA, Tambussi CP, Noriega JI, Erickson GM, Ketcham RA (2005) Definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous. Nature 433:305–308
Clarke JA, Tambussi CP, Noriega JI, Erickson GM, Ketcham RA (2006) Corrigendum to definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous. Nature 444:780
Cracraft J (1974) Phylogeny and evolution of the ratite birds. Ibis 116:494–521
Fain MG, Houde P (2004) Parallel radiations in the primary clades of birds. Evolution 58:2558–2573
Feduccia A (1995) Explosive evolution in tertiary birds and mammals. Science 267:637–638
Feduccia A (1999) 1,2,3—2,3,4: Accommodating the cladogram. PNAS 96:4740–4742
Mindell DP, Brown JW (2005) Neornithes. Modern birds. http://tolweb.org/Neornithes/15834/2005.12.14. Accessed 30 March 2012
Tambussi CP (2011) Paleoenvironmental and faunal inferences based upon the avian fossil record of Patagonia and Pampa: what works and what does not. Biol J Linn Soc 103:458–474
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tambussi, C.P., Degrange, F.J. (2013). Introduction. In: South American and Antarctic Continental Cenozoic Birds. SpringerBriefs in Earth System Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5467-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5467-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5466-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5467-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)