Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease with well-defined pathophysiological mechanisms, mostly affecting medial temporal lobe and associative neocortical structures. Neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles represent the pathological hallmarks of AD, and are respectively related to the accumulation of the amyloid-beta peptide (Aβ) in brain tissues, and to cytoskeletal changes that arise from the hyperphosphorylation of microtubule-associated Tau protein in neurons. According to the amyloid hypothesis of AD, the overproduction of Aβ is a consequence of the disruption of homeostatic processes that regulate the proteolytic cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP). Genetic, age-related and environmental factors contribute to a metabolic shift favoring the amyloidogenic processing of APP in detriment of the physiological, secretory pathway. Aβ peptides are generated by the successive cleavage of APP by beta-secretase (BACE-1) and gamma-secretase, which has been recently characterized as part of the presenilin complex. Among several beta-amyloid isoforms that bear subtle differences depending on the number of C-terminal amino acids, Aβ 1−42 plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of AD. The neurotoxic potential of the Aβ peptide results from its biochemical properties that favor aggregation into insoluble oligomers and protofibrils. These further originate fibrillary Aβ species that accumulate into senile and neuritic plaques. These processes, along with a reduction of Aβ clearance from the brain, leads to the extracellular accumulation of Aβ, and the subsequent activation of neurotoxic cascades that ultimately lead to cytoskeletal changes, neuronal dysfunction and cellular death. Intracerebral amyloidosis develops in AD patients in an age-dependent manner, but recent evidence indicate that it may be observed in some subjects as early as in the third or fourth decades of life, with increasing magnitude in late middle age, and highest estimates in old age. According to recent propositions, three clinical phases of Alzheimer’s disease may be defined: (i) pre-symptomatic (or pre-clinical) AD, which may last for several years or decades until the overproduction and accumulation of Aβ in the brain reaches a critical level that triggers the amyloid cascade; (ii) pre-dementia phase of AD (compatible with the definition of progressive, amnestic mild cognitive impairment), in which early-stage pathology is present, ranging from mild neuronal dystrophy to early-stage Braak pathology, and may last for several years according to individual resilience and brain reserve; (iii) clinically defined dementia phase of AD, in which cognitive and functional impairment is severe enough to surmount the dementia threshold; at this stage there is significant accumulation of neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in affected brain areas, bearing relationship with the magnitude of global impairment. New technologies based on structural and functional neuroimaging, and on the biochemical analysis of cerebrospinal fluid may depict correlates of intracerebral amyloidosis in individuals with mild, pre-dementia symptoms. These methods are commonly referred to as AD-related biomarkers, and the combination of clinical and biological information yields good diagnostic accuracy to identify individuals at high risk of AD. In other words, the characterization of pathogenic Aβ by means of biochemical analysis of biological fluids or by molecular neuroimaging are presented as diagnostic tools to help identify AD cases at the earliest stages of the disease process. The relevance of this early diagnosis of AD relies on the hypothesis that pharmacological interventions with disease-modifying compounds are more likely to produce clinically relevant benefits if started early enough in the continuum towards dementia. Therapies targeting the modification of amyloid-related cascades may be viewed as promising strategies to attenuate or even to prevent dementia. Therefore, the cumulative knowledge on the pathogenesis of AD derived from basic science models will hopefully be translated into clinical practice in the forthcoming years.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Key Players in the Pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)
1.1 Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP)
APP is a transmembrane, type-1, integral glycoprotein of 110–130 kDa (Roberts et al. 1994), and represents one of the most abundant proteins in the central nervous system (CNS). It is ubiquitously expressed in human tissues and is located in the plasma membrane as well as in several organelles, such as endoplasmic reticulum (ER), Golgi apparatus, and mitochondria (Rhein and Eckert 2007). There are several amyloid-β species that vary according to the number and sequence of amino acids; those with 40 and 42 amino acids (Aβ 40 and Aβ 42) are the most abundant in the brain (Recuero et al. 2004). Studies in cell biology have demonstrated that Aβ is generated in the Golgi, ER and endosomal/lysosomal system. Truncated Aβ peptides (Aβ x−42, “x” generally ranging from 1 to 11) are preferentially generated within the ER, whereas full-length Aβ peptides (Aβ 1−40/42) are predominantly originated in the Golgi/trans-Golgi network (TGN) and packaged into post-TGN secretory vesicles (Kulandaivelu and Gopal 2006; Anandatheerthavarada et al. 2003). N-terminal truncation extends to a maximum length around amino acid 11, which renders Aβ even more insoluble, and therefore, represent non-secreted forms (Peskind et al. 2006).
APP is metabolized by two distinct and mutually exclusive pathways: the secretory pathway (or non-amyloidogenic) and the amyloidogenic pathway (Fig. 14.1). In the former, APP is first cleaved by α-secretase, releasing a soluble N-terminal fragment (sAPPα) and a C-terminal fragment (C83), which is further cleaved by the γ-secretase to originate a smaller C-terminal fragment of 3 kDa (C3). The-secretory cleavage of APP is mediated by a group of membrane-bound proteases, which are members of the ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloprotease) family, and α-secretase activity has been attributed to ADAM-10 and ADAM-17 (Buxbaum et al. 1998; Lammich et al. 1999). The cleavage of APP by α-secretase occurs within the sequence of amino acids that pertain to the Aβ peptide, and therefore precludes the formation of amyloid peptides (Braak and Braak 1998). In the amyloidogenic pathway, APP is alternatively cleaved by β-secretase, releasing a smaller N-terminal fragment (sAPPβ) and a longer C-terminal fragment (C99) that contains the full amyloidogenic sequence of amino acids. A further cleavage of APP by γ-secretase yields the amyloid-β peptides (Aβ).
The Aβ species are released as monomers that progressively aggregate into dimmers, trimers, oligomers, protofibrils and fibrils, to finally deposit and originate the amyloid plaques. Despite their similarities, Aβ 42 is more prone to aggregation and fibrilization, being the most neurotoxic Aβ peptide. Therefore, Aβ 42 plays a pivotal in the pathogenesis of AD (Recuero et al. 2004).
Aβ oligomers are considered the most toxic forms of the amyloid derivates (Roberts et al. 1994). They interact with neurons and glial cells leading to the activation of pro-inflammatory cascades, mitochondrial dysfunction and increased oxidative stress (Sanz-Blasco et al. 2008), impairment of intracellular signaling pathways and synaptic plasticity, increased Tau phosphorylation, increased GSK-3β activity, deregulation of calcium metabolism, induction of neuronal apoptosis and cell death (Roberts et al. 1994). These mechanisms altogether give rise to a self-perpetuating, positive feedback loop in which the production of Aβ peptides leads to deleterious events to the neuronal cells, which in turn leads to dysfunction of the APP metabolism and more production of Aβ peptides. Aβ fibrils deposit in neuritic plaques in a sequential pattern: diffuse neuritic plaques, mature neuritic plaques, senile plaques and phantoms of senile plaques in more advanced stages of the disease. The plaque formation has also deleterious impact to the neurons also leading to their dysfunction and, ultimately, their death (Rhein and Eckert 2007).
Under physiological conditions, the APP is preferentially metabolized in the secretory pathway and there is equilibrium between Aβ peptide production and clearance from the brain (Roberts et al. 1994). Currently, two proteins are deemed as intimately involved in the clearance of Aβ peptides from the brain: apolipoprotein E (APOE) and the insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE). The exact mechanism or mechanisms by which Aβ peptides are cleared from the brain has not been totally elucidated, but a dominant hypothesis is that these proteins bind to the Aβ peptide, inhibiting its aggregation and promoting its clearance from the brain (Recuero et al. 2004). Disadvantageous genetic polymorphisms (such as the ε4 allele of APOE) and pathological conditions related to abnormal IDE homeostasis (e.g., diabetes mellitus) that may favor the amyloidogenic cleavage of APP and/or decrease the Aβ clearance from the brain will therefore facilitate the accumulation of Aβ in the neural tissues and downstream effects of the amyloid cascade (Schmitt 2006).
1.2 Tau Protein
Tau is a microtubule-associated protein found in most tissues and highly expressed in the peripheral nervous system. In neurons, it is an important component of the cytoskeleton (Kosik 1993). It interacts with α- and β-tubulin, and the phosphorylation state of Tau is critical to stabilize the polymers of tubulin (Fig. 14.2). In neurons, the microtubules are essential for the maintenance of neuronal structure, axonal transport, and neuronal plasticity (Lindwall and Cole 1984).
Tau is widely expressed in the central and peripheral nervous system, and therefore may be regarded as a neuronal phosphoprotein. In addition to the involvement of Tau in the maintenance of neuronal structure and in synaptic plasticity, microtubules are essential for axonal transport of organelles (mitochondria, ER, lysosomes) and vesicles containing proteins and neurotransmitters, which are displaced from the cell body (soma) to distal synapses. The neuronal polarity also depends on the properties of microtubules present in axons and dendrites. In axons, microtubules are uniformly oriented on account of the role of Tau protein (Kosik 1993; Shahani and Brandt 2002).
There is a phosphorylation gradient along the axon and in different brain regions, the distal axon being less phosphorylated, particularly in the white matter (Buée et al. 2000; Hernández and Avila 2007). Changes in the phosphorylation state of Tau occur in the process of remodeling of the cytoskeleton, in which the regulatory mechanisms of Tau phosphorylation become critical to promote synaptic plasticity. The abnormal phosphorylation of Tau negatively affects its ability to bind to tubulin, unsettling the structure of microtubules. In addition, hyperphosphorylated Tau impairs axonal transport and synaptic metabolism, causing dysfunctions that result in loss of cell viability and ultimately lead to the collapse of microtubular cytoskeleton and neuronal death. The phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of Tau at serine and threonine phosphoepitopes are critical regulatory events in neuronal homeostasis. At these sites, the substrates of phosphatases include ion channels and G protein receptors, where the synaptic traffic and are regulated by reversible phosphorylation of proteins (Wang et al. 2007).
Tau may be found in soluble and insoluble forms, the latter being identified in paired helicoidal filaments (PHF), which are the main component of neurofibrillary tangles (NFT). PHF-Tau complexes have six to eight phosphate groups per molecule of Tau protein, which is much higher than the usual degree of phosphorylation of Tau protein in the healthy brain (i.e., two phosphate groups per molecule).
Six Tau isoforms have been described in mammals. The main differences between these isoforms rely on the existence of three or four tubulin-binding domains, and some minor differences at the N-terminus of the protein (Cleveland and Hoffman 1991; Lovestone and Anderton 1992; Trojanowski et al. 1994; Shahani and Brandt 2002) The interaction between Tau and tubulin is a dynamic process in which Tau promotes its own polymerization and inhibits the fast depolymerization of tubulin (Johnson and Stoothoff 2004). Again, this process is regulated by the balance between phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of its phosphoepitopes. Tau protein has approximately 79 phosphorylation sites at serine and threonine residues (Shahani and Brandt 2002). Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of these epitopes promote conformational changes that influence the ability of Tau to interact with α- and β-tubulin and stabilize microtubules (Drechsel et al. 1992; Hernández and Avila 2007). Among several protein kinases and proteases are involved in Tau phosphorylation, glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β) the most important Tau kinase in neurons (Iqbal et al. 2005).
The expression of phosphatases protein (PP) PP1, PP2A and PP5 was found to be reduced in cerebral tissues of patients with AD (Buée et al. 2000; Wang et al. 2007). The majority of serine and threonine phosphoepitopes in fetal and in PHF-Tau is followed by proline residues, suggesting that Tau kinases belong to the family of proline-directed kinases (Wang et al. 2007), namely cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK5), MAP kinases (MAPK) and GSK (Lovestone et al. 1997). Such enzymes are capable to phosphorylate Tau in vitro and have been detected in the AD brain. Other proline-directed kinases such as protein kinase C (PKC), casein-kinases l and lI (Drechsel et al. 1992), calcium calmodulin-kinase ll (CaMPK-ll) (Lovestone et al. 1997; Johnson and Stoothoff 2004), and protein kinase A (PKA) have also been identified in neurofibrillary tangles and are involved in the regulation of the activity of the former.
In the embryonic stages of development, neuronal Tau is predominantly in hyperphosphorylated state. This is due the great demand for neuroplastic changes in neurons and synapses at early developmental stages of the CNS (Lovestone et al. 1997). In the mature CNS, Tau phosphoepitopes are maintained in a predominantly dephosphorylated state, which confers the necessary stability of the cytoskeleton to maintain neuronal homeostasis (Johnson and Stoothoff 2004). Nevertheless, dynamic changes in Tau phosphorylation are important for neuronal responses, including neurite outgrowth and synaptic plasticity (Iqbal et al. 2005). Under pathological conditions such as AD, Tau can be abnormally hyperphosphorylated. This abnormality impairs its capacity to bind to tubulin, destabilizing the microtubular structure. In addition, it impairs axonal transport and synaptic metabolism, leading to cytoskeleton collapse, loss of cellular viability and neuronal death (Drechsel et al. 1992).
1.3 The Amyloid Cascade
The amyloid hypothesis of AD was described in the early 1990’s (Hardy and Higgins 1992). According to it, the accumulation of Aβ peptides into senile and neuritic plaques in the brain, either due to an increased production or decreased clearance, is the core feature in the pathogenesis of AD. Therefore, Aβ triggers several deleterious events that disrupt neuronal homeostasis, e.g., mitochondrial dysfunction, activation of oxidative stress and inflammatory cascades (Selkoe 1991), impaired neurotrophic support and response to injury, decreased neuroplasticity and neurogenesis, hyperphosphorylation of Tau protein, apoptosis, and abnormalities in calcium metabolism. These events are subject to positive feedback, amplifying Aβ-related neurotoxicity, and culminating with neuronal death (Kulandaivelu and Gopal 2006). Recent evidence indicated that not only the Aβ peptides per se may act as a trigger to the amyloid cascade, but rather the oligomeric and fibrillary forms, which are currently regard the most toxic forms of Aβ (Vieira et al. 2007).
The amyloid cascade hypothesis was based mostly on findings from in vitro and in vivo studies, and was further strengthened by the discovery of genetic mutations associated with early-onset, familial AD. These are severe forms of the disease, in which massive intracerebral amyloidogenesis occur prematurely as a consequence of mutations affecting APP metabolism (i.e., mutations in the APP gene in chromosome 21, and in presenilin 1 and 2 genes in chromosomes 14 and 1 respectively). The genetic manipulation of these AD-related mutations was the most important asset for the development of genetically modified animal models of AD (Kulandaivelu and Gopal 2006).
There are several caveats regarding the amyloid hypothesis of AD. First, neuropathological studies did not find a significant correlation between amyloid plaque density in the brain and the severity of dementia. The senile plaques are extracellular deposits consisting of a central core of Aβ peptide surrounded by activated microglia and reactive astrocytes, which are associated with neuronal degeneration. AD is the only neurodegenerative disease in which the Aβ peptide is the considered the pathological cornerstone; in contrast, a significant number of non-demented elderly subjects have amyloid plaques in the brain in post-mortem examination; in some cases, plaque counts in non-demented individuals are comparable to those found in AD patients (Lippa and Morris 2006). Also, most of anti-amyloid based therapeutic strategies failed to show clinically relevant results either in improving cognitive performance or in halting the clinical progression of dementia (Lippa and Morris 2006; Cummings 2006). Finally, the cellular and animal models of AD are based mostly on the genetic mutation associated with the early-onset AD. Nevertheless, early-onset AD accounts for the minority of the cases of dementia, whereas late-onset AD is far more common and is not associated with the aforementioned mutations. As opposed to that, sporadic AD has a multifactorial etiology, involving multiple genetic polymorphisms with minor risk-effects and other pathological mechanisms, in addition to the amyloidogenesis per se (Holmes et al. 2008)
1.4 Tau-related Hypotheses
One of the neuropathological hallmarks of AD is the presence of intra-neuronal lesions called neurofibrillary tangles (Swerdlow 2007b). The main components of NFTs are the paired helicoidal filaments, which are constituted fundamentally of hyperphosphorylated Tau. At least 25 abnormal phosphorylation sites were described in PHF-Tau in AD (Braak and Tredici 2004), and the abnormal phosphorylation of Tau protein is a marker of neuronal degeneration in this disorder (Mazanetz and Fischer 2007). The phosphorylation of the serine/threonine residues near the binding region of Tau to tubulin favors Tau disaggregation and their reassembly into PHf (Iqbal et al. 2005). Due to the importance of Tau in maintaining the neuronal stability and homeostasis, its abnormal phosphorylation leads to a cascade of neuronal events that ultimately cause the neuronal dysfunction and death.
There are several lines of evidence that support the notion that the disruption of Tau homeostasis is a primary event in AD. Besides AD, Tau abnormalities are also found in other neurodegenerative disorders, such as frontotemporal dementia, cortico-basal degeneration, multiple system atrophy, and motor neuron disease (Iqbal et al. 2005). For these reason, these conditions are referred to as tauopathies. Neuropathological studies have demonstrated that the evolution of the distribution of NFT in the brain correlates with the clinical progression of cognitive deficits in AD. Moreover, intra-neuronal hyperphosphorylated Tau can be found in the brain of subjects with very mild dementia, unaccompanied by Aβ pathology (Braak and Tredici 2004). Therefore, the hyperphosphorylation of Tau may be the initial step in the physiopathology of AD; other pathological events, including abnormal APP metabolism leading to excessive Aβ production, may be secondary to the former disruption of neuronal homeostasis (Rhein and Eckert 2007). Nevertheless, the larger body of evidence relating the amyloid pathology in AD and the lack of no genetic mutations in Tau gene associated to early or late-onset AD weaken the hypothesis that Tau pathology is the earliest event in AD (Oide et al. 2006).
Despite the strong evidences supporting the primary role of either Aβ peptides or hyperphosphorylated Tau protein in the pathogenesis of AD, neither of these hypotheses fully accounts for the wide spectrum of pathological changes in AD. Therefore, some alternative and complementary hypotheses have been proposed to explain the physiopathology of AD. Most of these hypotheses involve the activity of proteins and enzymes that exert their biological functions upstream in the cascades involved in the regulation of the APP/Aβ and Tau metabolism.
GSK3β is a key enzyme in the regulation cell cycle; in neurons it plays a pivotal role in the regulation of Tau phosphorylation (i.e., overactive GSK3β leads to hyperphosphorylation of Tau). Recent studies have also demonstrated that the deregulation of GSK3β activity is involved in several other pathological events associated with AD, for instance, increased production of the Aβ peptide, induction of apoptosis, and impaired neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity (Lippa and Morris 2006). In vitro studies have shown that the pharmacological activation of GSK3β leads to neuronal changes and death in a similar fashion as observed in AD (Cummings 2006; Holmes et al. 2008). On the other hand, in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that the pharmacological inhibition of GSK3β (e.g., with lithium salts) protected neurons against mechanisms of degeneration induced by Aβ and hyperphosphorylated Tau (Cummings 2006; Swerdlow 2007a).
Few studies have been carried out in humans to determine the activity of GSK3β in AD patients. One interesting study has shown that GSK3β activity is increased in leukocyte of patients with AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (Hye A et al. 2005). According to the GSK3β hypothesis of AD (Braak and Tredici 2004), increased GSK3β activity is an early pathological event in the pathophysiology of AD, by triggering a cascade of events culminating both in increased production of Aβ and Tau hyperphosphorylation. Despite the elegant mechanisms elicited by the GSK3β hypothesis, which encompasses in a broader sense both amyloid- and Tau-related mechanisms, it lacks consistent empirical evidences.
2 Clinical-Pathological Aspects
The neuropathology of AD was first described by Alois Alzheimer in two patients showing diffuse cortical atrophy, neurofibrillary tangles (only in the initial patient) and senile plaques (in both cases) distributed throughout the cerebral cortex (Moller and Graeber 1998). Glenner and Wong, in 1984, identified the sequence of the proteinaceous central component of the senile plaques, by isolating the amyloid from meningeal vessels from AD patients. The senile (neuritic) plaques are diffusely distributed in the neocortex and limbic system in patients who have AD (Mesulam 2000). Other forms of Aβ accumulation include diffuse (non-neuritic) plaques and vascular deposition that may lead to cerebral hemorrhage.
The establishment of a correlation between the neuropathological findings in AD patients and in middle-aged subjects with Down’s syndrome (who have trisomy of the chromosome 21) has led to the identification of the gene that encodes the β-amyloid protein precursor (APP) in the same chromosome (Kang et al. 1987).
In early-onset familial cases of AD, occurring as an autosomal dominant trait, three distinct mutations are described: the aforementioned APP gene on chromosome 21 (Murrell et al. 1991), the presenilin 1 gene on chromosome 14 (Sherrington et al. 1995), and the presenilin 2 gene on chromosome 1 (Levy-Lahad et al. 1995). The fact that the presenilins are related to the γ-secretase complex strongly favored the amyloid cascade hypothesis in AD pathogenesis (De Strooper 2003).
High levels of Aβ peptide can be found in the brain of individuals without cognitive decline as early as the age of 40 years, preceding the formation of neuritic plaques (Funato et al. 1998). This deposition seems to occur earlier in carriers of the ε4 allele of APOE (Morishima-Kawashima et al. 2000), whose homozygosity constitutes a well-known risk factor for the development of AD.
Although Alzheimer’s disease is the only neurodegenerative disorder in which the Aβ peptide is considered by many to be a pathological cornerstone, the question remains open: is the deposition of Aβ protein a central event in the pathophysiology of AD or just a biomarker of an underlying process still to be fully understood?
The several issues regarding the Aβ cascade hypothesis, the most important of all is perhaps the fact that neuropathological studies did not find a strict correlation between neuritic plaque density and number in the brain and the severity of dementia, the latter appearing to correlate more significantly with the density of neurofibrillary tangles (Knopman et al. 2003; Sonnen et al. 2007). It has been thus hypothesized that this poor relationship between neuritic plaque density and severity of dementia might be better understood if preamyloid-like soluble aggregates of Aβ (Aβ oligomers) are the causative agents of neurotoxicity in AD (Lesne and Kotilinek 2005; Eckman and Eckman 2007)
This lack of clinico-pathological correlation has led to a consensus to distinguish the clinical term “Alzheimer disease” from “Alzheimer disease neuropathological alterations”. Clinical AD refers to a set of clinical signs and cognitive/behavioral symptoms that are present in patients who have substantial AD neuropathological changes. AD neuropathology describes the presence and extent of pathological changes of AD observed at brain autopsy regardless of the clinical picture exhibited by the patient.
2.1 Neuropathological Diagnosis of AD
The proposed National Institute on Aging—Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathological assessment of AD (NIA—Alzheimer’s Association 2011, draft) recommends that the diagnosis should be based on an “ABC” score where A and C stand for amyloid pathology (while “B” stands for neurofibrillary tangles according to Braak and Braak criteria), as follows:
-
A. Presence of amyloid plaques (modified from Thal et al. 2002):
-
A0: No Aβ or amyloid plaques
-
A1: Neocortical Aβ or amyloid plaques in sections of frontal, temporal, or parietal lobes
-
A2: A1 plus hippocampal Aβ or amyloid plaques
-
A3: A2 plus neostriatal Aβ or amyloid plaques
-
-
C. Presence of neuritic plaques (modified from the CERAD protocol, which employs a semi-quantitative evaluation of neuritic plaques) (Mirra et al. 1991):
-
C0: No neuritic plaques
-
C1: CERAD score sparse
-
C2: CERAD score moderate
-
C3: CERAD score frequent
-
Clinico-pathological correlations guidelines were also proposed: for patients without cognitive impairment, it should be considered that AD neuropathological changes may represent a preclinical stage of the disease that may last for years (Sperling et al. 2011a, b); for individuals with cognitive impairment, the presence of widespread neurofibrillary tangles with varying degrees of Aβ accumulation and neuritic plaques should be interpreted as an adequate cause of cognitive impairment or dementia. However, a low density of neurofibrillary tangles, even when associated with frequent neuritic plaques most likely indicate other diseases leading to cognitive impairment.
As already stated, the elderly without dementia or those clinically diagnosed as MCI can harbor AD pathology that may be quite indistinguishable from that of persons with dementia (Rentz et al. 2010). Moreover, neuritic plaques (as well as neurofibrillary tangles) may also be present in “normal aging”. Despite this, the correspondence between clinical and pathological diagnosis in AD ranges from 70 to 90 % (Swerdlow 2007a).
There is much less data on about the underlying neuropathology of MCI; some studies have suggested that about one half of persons clinically diagnosed as MCI have sufficient neuropathology to warrant the pathologic diagnosis of AD (Markesbery et al. 2006; Schneider et al. 2009a), and, as a group, they tend to display an intermediate pattern of AD pathology (between subjects no cognitive impairment and those with dementia), which suggests a gradual accumulation of neuropathological changes in the progression from cognitively normal to dementia (Bennett et al. 2005).
One study has showed that up to one third of the subjects considered to cognitively normal when tested a few months prior to death had neuropathological alterations that were sufficient to render them to be diagnosed as AD patients (although in general these neuropathological alterations tend to be less severe than those found in subjects clinically diagnosed as MCI or AD). Moreover, a lower performance in specific cognitive domains, such as episodic memory, was found in normal subjects presenting neuropathological changes when compared to those who had not such alterations (Bennett et al. 2006).
The fact that it takes many years for AD to develop may explain the presence of varying degrees of pathological alterations before subjects start to present clinical symptoms, especially if we take into account a number of factors that may interfere with the course of the disease. This becomes particularly evident when we observe the overlap of neuropathological alterations in patients who are still regarded as MCI and those with dementia and such observations have given rise to the concept of “cognitive functional reserve”. The cognitive reserve may be due to several factors such as high educational level (Roe et al. 2007), the maintenance of intellectual activities across the life span (Wilson et al. 2002), nutrition habits (Petot and Friedland 2004), lifestyle and the coexistence of other medical conditions as systemic arterial hypertension, diabetes, obesity, etc., (Scarmeas and Stern 2003), and genetics (Tupler et al. 2007).
Another source of uncertainty in assessing the exact role of Aβ deposition in the pathogenesis of AD is the fact that over 50 % of dementia cases are of mixed etiology (Schneider et al. 2009a, b), with concomitant neuropathological findings of either vascular or Lewy body’s disease. The coexistence of more than one pathology decreases brain reserve and increases the likelihood of developing dementia. Also, the distribution of mixed dementias differs depending on the population studied: in memory clinics, there is a higher frequency of pathologically proven Lewy body’s disease and frontotemporal dementia (regardless of the clinical diagnosis), while in community-based studies, pathologically proven AD and AD with vascular disease prevail (Schneider et al. 2009a).
It is worthy of note that most anti-amyloid based therapeutic strategies have failed to show clinically relevant results either in improving cognition or in halting the clinical progression of dementia (Cummings 2006) and, finally, cellular and animal models of AD are based largely on genetic mutations associated with familial, early-onset AD, which accounts for a small proportion of dementia cases. Since late-onset AD represents the vast majority of cases, that it is not determined by a single gene mutation (but rather has a multifactorial nature), and considering that amyloidogenesis in these patients occurs to a lesser extent compared to the early AD, questions have been raised concerning the appropriateness of early-onset AD models to aid understanding of late-onset AD (Swerdlow 2007a).
2.2 Clinical Diagnosis of AD
The advances in the understanding of the chain of pathological events that lead to AD and the acknowledgment of its long pre-clinical stages required a significant revision of AD diagnostic criteria. The NINCDS-ADRDA diagnostic criteria for AD (McKhann et al. 1984) were based mostly in the clinical presentation of dementia and were largely exclusionary, i.e., AD was diagnosed after the exclusion of other possible causes of dementia. Recently, a workgroup launched by the National Institute of Aging (NIA) and the Alzheimer’s Association proposed an extensive revision of its diagnostic criteria, including the recognition of its pre-clinical and prodromal stages (Mckhann et al. 2011; Sperling et al. 2011a, b; Albert et al. 2011). Table 14.1 shows the current diagnostic criteria for clinical AD and its pre-clinical and prodromal stages.
3 Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers
A biomarker is a characteristic that can be measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal or pathological process, or to monitor the effect of therapeutical interventions on specific biological cascades (Wagner 2009). The ideal diagnostic marker for AD should meet at least three basic requirements: (i) reflect core neurobiological changes subsequent to the disease process; (ii) be validated by post-mortem studies, assuming that the neuropathological findings as gold standards; and (iii) be measurable as early as possible in the disease continuum—ideally at pre-symptomatic stages (NIA 1998). Additional requirements include being non-invasive and simple to perform, precise and reliable, and adequate for large-scale screenings. Among many candidate markers of amyloidogenesis, those with the most promising results and potential to clinical application are the amyloid-β1−42 (Aβ42) peptide in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the in vivo, molecular imaging of Aβ42 deposits in the brain with positron emission tomography (PET) (Blennow et al. 2010).
3.1 Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Biomarkers
The CSF may be considered the ideal source for biomarkers in AD. It is in intimate contact with the cerebral tissue, and pathological changes in the brain are often reflected in the CSF (Reiber 2001). Among several potential diagnostic biomarkers, the most consistent findings have been obtained with the measurement of CSF concentrations of Aβ 42, along with total Tau (T-Tau) and phosphorylated Tau (P-Tau) (Blennow 2004). AD patients characteristically display low concentrations of Aβ 42 (Sunderland et al. 2003). The reduction in the CSF Aβ42 is thought to be secondary to a “sinking” effect of this peptide into plaques during the progression of brain amyloidogenesis (Bates et al. 2009). Also, these patients show high concentrations of T-Tau and P-Tau. This pattern of CSF biomarkers is commonly referred to as the “AD signature” in the CSF (Diniz et al. 2008). This biomarker signature reflects core pathophysiological features of the disease (Wiltfang et al. 2005), and has been validated in post-mortem studies (Buerger et al. 2006; Clark et al. 2003; Tapiola et al. 2009).
Several studies have been published to support the notion that this AD-positive CSF pattern has good diagnostic accuracy to distinguish between normal ageing and AD (>85 %) and a positive predictive value (>90 %) to determine the dementia outcome in patients with MCI (Blennow and Hampel 2003; Hansson et al. 2006). However, in the differential diagnosis of established dementia syndromes, the sensitivity and specificity profile to differentiate AD from other dementias is significantly lower (Andreasen et al. 2001). Large-scale longitudinal studies of MCI cohorts consistently demonstrated that the presence of the “AD signature” in the CSF has a good diagnostic accuracy (i.e. >80 %) to discriminate patients with MCI who progress to AD (“MCI-converters”) from those who remain cognitively stable (“MCI-stable” patients) and healthy controls (Hansson et al. 2006), and also from those MCI patients who progress to non-AD dementias (Riemenschneider et al. 2002; Mattsson et al. 2009). Interestingly, MCI patients with progressive deficits (albeit did not reach the threshold of dementia diagnosis) have a similar CSF biomarker signature as the MCI-converters patients. On the other hand, MCI patients who display non-progressive deficits over time have a CSF biomarker pattern very similar to that found in healthy older adults. These sets of data have been extensively replicated by different research groups worldwide and by meta-analytical studies (Arai et al. 2000; Hampel et al. 2004; Shaw et al. 2009; Forlenza et al. 2010a).
Taken together, there is a large bulk of evidence that the “AD signature” in the CSF is a strong predictor of the dementia outcome. In other words, MCI patients who will convert to AD have a CSF biomarker pattern indistinguishable of that found in patients with dementia of the AD-type. Otherwise, MCI subjects with a non-AD CSF signature have a low probability to develop AD, even upon long-term follow-up.
Yet, methodological limitations need to be overcome before the assessment of CSF biomarkers can be used in the routine clinical assessment of patients with cognitive complaints. Although the determinations of CSF concentrations of these biomarkers using ELISA or multiplex techniques (e.g., xMAP-Luminex) have low coefficients of intra-laboratory variability (5–10 %), the high inter-laboratorial variation (20–30 %) is a major obstacle for the comparison of data generated in different settings (Mattsson et al. 2010). Multiple sources of bias include pre-assay (i.e., lumbar puncture protocol, sample handling and aliquot storing prior to experimentation), intra-assay (different methods and protocols for the determination of the concentrations of biomarkers), and post-assay variations (e.g., definition of norms for patients and controls to guide the interpretation of results) (Mattsson et al. 2010, 2011). This situation is a major limitation for the establishment of multicentric cooperation and the establishment of gold-standard protocols and reference values to be shared by distinct laboratories.
3.2 Amyloid-β42 Molecular Imaging
The possibility to visualise in vivo the amyloid pathology in the brain has been a major advance in AD-related biomarker research. Many compounds have been developed and launched so far, including the “Pittsburgh Coumpound B” (PiB) (Mathis et al. 2003; Klunk et al. 2004), the F-BAY94-9172 (Rowe et al. 2008), the FDDNP, a dual, amyloid and Tau-binding compound (Small et al. 2006), the Florbetapir (Choi et al. 2009), among others.
In AD, there is an increased global cortical and regional retention of PiB and other compounds, particularly in the cingulate, temporal, parietal and frontal cortices (Edison et al. 2007). Studies with amyloid imaging in mild AD have a very high sensitivity (over 90 %), but the specificity is age-dependent, due to the increasing deposition of Aβ overtime in healthy elders. Important studies have shown correlations between intracerebral amyloid content (as shown by PiB scans) and CSF concentrations of Aβ42 in patients with mild AD as compared to controls (Fagan et al. 2006; Fagan et al. 2009).
Patients with amnestic MCI also show increased PiB retention as compared to healthy older subjects, but to a lesser extent to those observed in AD patients. Positive PiB scans predict conversion, and PiB retention (global and regional) correlates with cognitive performance (Kemppainen et al. 2007; Forsberg et al. 2008). In a prospective study, PiB-positive MCI patients had a higher conversion rate than PiB-negative patients; in addition, the amyloid load was negatively associated with time to conversion (Okello et al. 2009). PiB retention was also observed in elderly subjects without cognitive complaints or dementia; it is noteworthy that a higher retention at baseline was associated with a worse cognitive performance and predicted a faster decline (Villemagne et al. 2008; Aizenstein et al. 2008; Resnick et al. 2010; Reiman et al. 2009). These findings are largely compatible with the CSF biomarkers as predictors of cognitive deterioration in non-demented older adults (Fagan et al. 2007).
3.3 Pre-dementia and Pre-clinical AD: The Role of Amyloid-Related Biomarkers
Recent evidences derived from biomarkers research strengthen the primary role of amyloid pathology in AD. Data from CSF and molecular imaging studies reinforces the notion that the accumulation of Aβ in the AD brain precedes the onset of functional and structural changes characteristic of AD (Fellgiebel et al. 2004; Bouwman et al. 2007; Josephs et al. 2008; Hansson et al. 2009; Jack et al. 2009a). These observations lead to the development of a hypothetical cascade of biological events that begins by the production and accumulation of Aβ 42 (i.e. reduced CSF Aβ 42 and increased PiB retention) in the brain that triggers secondary pathological events culminating in synaptic dysfunction and regional hypometabolism (FDG-PET studies), neurodegeneration (i.e. increased CSF Tau and phospho-Tau proteins) and structural changes (hippocampal and other regional atrophy). Finally subjects start experiencing cognitive deficits and functional difficulties, reaching the threshold for dementia diagnosis. (Jack et al. 2009b; Forlenza et al. 2010b).
4 Amyloid-Based Disease-Modifying Therapies
Given the relevance of cerebral amyloidogenesis in AD, several drugs and therapeutical strategies have been developed to either reduce the production of amyloid-β or to accelerate its clearance in the brain. The goals are to delay the clinical progression in patients with AD, but most importantly, to prevent new dementia cases in older subjects. The most common mechanisms of action of these drugs are the inhibition of gamma and beta-secretase activity and immunetherapeutical approaches (Citron 2010). Despite the sound preclinical rationale, no therapeutical agent so far has consistently shown a significant/benefit for patients with AD.
The gamma- and beta-secretase inhibitors were the first agents to show promising disease-modifying effect for AD (Panza et al. 2009). These drugs were able to reduce cerebral amyloid burden and improving memory deficits in transgenic mice models of AD (Chang et al. 2004; Lahiri et al. 2007; Imbimbo et al. 2007). Phase I and II clinical trials showed a mild but significant improvement in cognitive deficits in subjects with mild to moderate AD (Fleisher et al. 2008; Siemers et al. 2006). These results encouraged phase III clinical trials with these agents. However, the results were largely negative, with no improvement in cognition or functional status and increased risk of serious adverse events in patients with mild to moderate AD (Green et al. 2009; Carlson et al. 2011).
Immunotherapeutical strategies have been extensively studied for AD since early 2000. Two main approaches have been developed so far: active and passive immunotherapy (Brody and Holtzman 2008). The active immunotherapy (i.e. anti-amyloid vaccine) aims to sensitize the immune system to improve the amyloid clearance by activating microglial cells (Morgan et al. 2000). This would not only reduce the amount of soluble amyloid species but also the amyloid plaques in the brain. Preclinical studies showed a significant improvement of memory deficits along a drastic reduction of amyloid burden in transgenic mice without a significant local neuroinflammatory reaction. However, a phase II clinical trial needed to be prematurely interrupted due to clinically significant neuroinflammatory reaction that led to brain oedema and death in patients who received the amyloid vaccine (Orgogozo et al. 2003; Gilman et al. 2005). Follow-up of patients recruited to this trial showed that vaccine was not associated to significant clinical improvement in patients receiving the vaccine; nonetheless, the neuropathological examination of brains of patients who received the vaccine demonstrated a significant reduction in amyloid plaques in all brain regions but also increased reactive microglia and perivascular oedema (Nicoll et al. 2003).
More recently, passive immunotherapy approaches with anti-amyloid antibodies have been developed. This strategy also aims to improve the clearance of brain amyloid without activating the microglial system and thus reducing the risk of neuroinflammation (Lichtlen and Mohajeri 2008; Geylis and Steinitz 2006; Roher et al. 2011; Serrano-Pozo et al. 2010). Phase II clinical trials had promising results, with patients showing a significant improvement in cognition, without the emergence of serious adverse events (Salloway et al. 2009; Rinne et al. 2010). Currently, phase III clinical trials are underway to establish the clinical efficacy and safety of these agents in mild AD.
Abbreviations
- APP :
-
Amyloid Precursor Protein
- AD:
-
Alzheimer’s Disease
- APOE:
-
Apolipoprotein E
- Aβ :
-
Amyloid-β peptide
- CaMK-ll:
-
Calcium calmodulin-kinase ll
- CDK5:
-
Cyclin-Dependent Kinases 5
- CERAD:
-
Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease
- CNS:
-
Central Nervous System
- CSF:
-
Cerebrospinal fluid
- ER:
-
Endoplasmic Reticulum
- GSK3β :
-
Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3β
- IDE:
-
Insulin-Degrading Enzyme
- MAPK:
-
Microtubule Associated Protein Kinases
- MCI:
-
Mild Cognitive Impairment
- NFT:
-
Neurofibrillary Tangle
- NIA:
-
National Institute of Aging
- PHF:
-
Paired Helicoidal Filaments
- PKA:
-
Protein Kinase A
- PKC:
-
Protein Kinase C
- PP:
-
Phosphatases Protein
- P-Tau:
-
Phosphorylated Tau
- sAPPα :
-
Soluble N-terminal fragment
- TGN:
-
Trans-Golgi Network
- T-Tau:
-
Total Tau
References
Aizenstein HJ, Nebes RD, Saxton JA, Price J, Mathis C, Tsopelas ND, Ziolko SK, James J, Snitz B, Houck PR (2008) Frequent amyloid deposition without significant cognitive impairment among the elderly. Arch Neurol 65:1509–1517
Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, Gamst A, Holtzman DM, Jagust WJ, Petersen RC, Snyder PJ, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Phelps CH (2011) The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 7:270–279
Anandatheerthavarada HK, Biswas GM, Robin AN, Avadhani G (2003) Mitochondrial targeting and a novel transmembrane arrest of Alzheimer’s amyloid precursor protein impairs mitochondrial function in neuronal cells. J Cell Biol 161:41–54
Andreasen N, Minthon L, Davidsson P, Vanmechelen E, Vanderstichele H, Winblad B, Blennow K (2001) Evaluation of CSF-tau and CSF-Abeta42 as diagnostic markers for Alzheimer disease in clinical practice. Arch Neurol 58:373–379
Arai H, Ishiguro K, Ohno H, Moriyama M, Itoh N, Okamura N, Matsui T, Morikawa Y, Horikawa E, Kohno H (2000) CSF phosphorylated tau protein and mild cognitive impairment: a prospective study. Exp Neurol 166:201–203
Bates KA, Verdile G, Li Q, Ames D, Hudson P, Masters C (2009) Clearance mechanisms of Alzheimer’s amyloid-beta peptide: implications for therapeutic design and diagnostic tests. Mol Psychiatry 14:469–486
Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Bienias JL, Evans DA, Wilson RS (2005) Mild cognitive impairment is related to Alzheimer disease pathology and cerebral infarctions. Neurology 64:834–841
Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Kelly JF, Aggarwal NT, Shah RC, Wilson RS (2006) Neuropathology of older persons without cognitive impairment from two community-based studies. Neurology 66:1837–1844
Blennow K (2004) Cerebrospinal fluid protein biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroRX 1:213–225
Blennow K, Hampel H (2003) CSF markers for incipient Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol 2:605–613
Blennow K, Hampel H, Weiner M, Zetterberg H (2010) Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 6:131–144
Bouwman FH, Schoonenboom SN, Van Der Flier WM, Van Elk EJ, Kok A, Barkhof F, Blankenstein MA, Scheltens P (2007) CSF biomarkers and medial temporal lobe atrophy predict dementia in mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging 28:1070–1074
Braak H, Braak E (1998) Evolution of neuronal changes in the course of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neural Transm Suppl 53:127–140
Braak H, Tredici KD (2004) Alzheimer’s disease: intraneuronal alterations precede insoluble amyloid-b formation. Neurobiol Aging 25:713–718
Brody DL, Holtzman DM (2008) Active and passive immunotherapy for neurodegenerative disorders. Ann Rev Neurosci 31:175–193
Buée L, Bussière T, Buée-Scherrer V, Delacourte A, Hof PR (2000) Tau protein isoforms, phosphorylation and role in neurodegenerative disorders. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 33:95–130
Buerger K, Ewers M, Pirttilä T, Zinkowski R, Alafuzoff I, Teipel SJ, DeBernardis J, Kerkman D, McCulloch C, Soininen H (2006) CSF phosphorylated tau protein correlates with neocortical neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 129:3035–3041
Buxbaum JD, Thinakaran G, Koliatsos V, O’Callahan J, Slunt HH, Price DL, Sisodia SS (1998) Alzheimer amyloid protein precursor in the rat hippocampus: transport and processing through the perforant path. J Neurosci 18:9629–9637
Carlson C, Estergard W, Oh J, Suhy J, Jack CR Jr, Siemers E, Barakos J (2011) Prevalence of asymptomatic vasogenic edema in pretreatment Alzheimer’s disease study cohorts from phase 3 trials of semagacestat and solanezumab. Alzheimers Dement 7:396–401
Chang WP, Koelsch G, Wong S, Downs D, Da H, Weerasena V, Gordon B, Devasamudram T, Bilcer G, Ghosh AK, Tang J (2004) In vivo inhibition of Abeta production by memapsin 2 (beta-secretase) inhibitors. J Neurochem 89:1409–1416
Choi SR, Golding G, Zhuang Z, Zhang W, Lim N, Hefti F (2009) Preclinical properties of 18F-AV-45: a PET agent for Abeta plaques in the brain. J Nucl Med 50:1887–1894
Citron M (2010) Alzheimer’s disease: strategies for disease modification. Nature Rev Drug Discov 9:387–398
Clark C, Xie S, Chittams J, Ewbank D, Peskind E, Galasko D, Morris J, McKeel DW, Farlow M, Weitlauf SL (2003) Cerebrospinal fluid tau and beta-amyloid: how well do these biomarkers reflect autopsy-confirmed dementia diagnoses? Arch Neurol 60:1696–1702
Cleveland DW, Hoffman PN (1991) Neuronal and glial cytoskeletons. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol 1:346–353
Consensus Report of the Working Group on: “Molecular and Biochemical Markers of Alzheimer’s Disease” (1998) The Ronald and Nancy Reagan Research Institute of the Alzheimer’s Association and the National Institute on Aging Working Group. Neurobiol Aging 19:109–116
Cummings J (2006) Challenges to demonstrating disease-modifying effects in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials. Challenges to demonstrating disease-modifying effects in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials. Alzheimer Dement 2:263–271
De Strooper B (2003) Aph-1, Pen-2, and Nicastrin with Presenilin generate an active gamma-secretase complex. Neuron 38:9–12
Diniz B, Pinto J, Forlenza OV (2008) Do CSF total tau, phosphorylated tau, and b-amyloid 42 help to predict progression of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. World J Biol Psychiatry 9:172–182
Drechsel DN, Hyman AA, Cobb MH, Kirschner MW (1992) Modulation of the dynamic instability of tubulin assembly by the microtubule-associated protein tau. Mol Biol Cell 3:1141–1154
Eckman CB, Eckman EA (2007) An Update on the amyloid hypothesis. Neurol Clin 25:669–682
Edison P, Archer HA, Hinz R, Hammers A, Pavese N, Tai YF, Hotton G, Cutler D, Fox N, Kennedy A, Rossor M, Brooks DJ (2007) Amyloid, hypometabolism, and cognition in Alzheimer disease: an [11C]PIB and [18F]FDG PET study. Neurology 68:501–508
Fagan AM, Mintun MA, Mach RH, Lee SY, Dence CS, Shah AR, LaRossa GN, Spinner ML, Klunk WE, Mathis CA, DeKosky ST, Morris JC, Holtzman DM (2006) Inverse relation between in vivo amyloid imaging load and cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42 in humans. Ann Neurol 59:512–519
Fagan AM, Roe CM, Xiong C, Mintun MA, Morris J, Holtzman D (2007) Cerebrospinal fluid tau/beta-amyloid(42) ratio as a prediction of cognitive decline in nondemented older adults. Arch Neurol 64:343–349
Fagan AM, Mintun MA, Shah AR, Aldea P, Roe CM, Mach RH, Marcus D, Morris JC, Holtzman DM (2009) Cerebrospinal fluid tau and ptau(181) increase with cortical amyloid deposition in cognitively normal individuals: implications for future clinical trials of Alzheimer’s disease. EMBO Mol Med 1:371–380
Fellgiebel A, Siessmeier T, Scheurich A, Winterer G, Bartenstein P, Schmidt LG, Möller MJ (2004) Association of elevated phospho-tau levels with Alzheimer-typical 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography findings in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Biol Psychiatry 56:279–283
Fleisher AS, Raman R, Siemers ER, Becerra L, Clark CM, Dean RA, Farlow MR, Galvin JE, Peskind ER, Quinn JF, Sherzai A, Sowell BB, Aisen PS, Thal LJ (2008) Phase 2 safety trial targeting amyloid beta production with a gamma-secretase inhibitor in Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 65:1031–1038
Forlenza OV, Diniz BS, Gattaz WF (2010a) Diagnosis and biomarkers of predementia in Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Med 8:89
Forlenza OV, Diniz BS, Talib LL, Radanovic M, Yassuda MS, Ojopi EB, Gattaz WF (2010b) Clinical and biological predictors of Alzheimer’s disease in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 32:216–222
Forsberg A, Engler H, Almkvist O, Blomquist G, Hagman G, Wall A, Ringheim A, Langström B, Nordberg A (2008) PET imaging of amyloid deposition in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging 29:1456–1465
Funato H, Yoshimura M, Kusui K, Tamaoka A, Ishikawa K, Ohkoshi N, Namekata K, Okeda R, Ihara Y (1998) Quantitation of amyloid beta-protein (A beta) in the cortex during aging and in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol 152:1633–1640
Geylis V, Steinitz M (2006) Immunotherapy of Alzheimer’s disease (AD): from murine models to anti-amyloid beta (Abeta) human monoclonal antibodies. Autoimmun Rev 5:33–39
Gilman S, Koller M, Black RS, Jenkins L, Griffith SG, Fox NC, Eisner L, Kirby. L, Rovira MB, Forette F, Orgogozo JM (2005) AN1792(QS-21)-201 Study Team. Clinical effects of Abeta immunization (AN1792) in patients with AD in an interrupted trial. Neurology 64:1553–1562
Glenner GG, Wong CW (1984) Alzheimer’s disease: initial report of the purification and characterization of a novel cerebrovascular amyloid protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 120:885–890
Green RC, Schneider LS, Amato DA, Beelen AP, Wilcock G, Swabb EA, Zavitz KH (2009) Tarenflurbil Phase 3 Study Group. Effect of tarenflurbil on cognitive decline and activities of daily living in patients with mild Alzheimer disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 302:2557–2564
Hampel H, Teipel SJ, Fuchsberger T, Andreasen N, Wiltfang J, Otto M, Shen Y, Dodel R, Du Y, Farlow M (2004) Value of CSF beta-amyloid1–42 and tau as predictors of Alzheimer’s disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Mol Psychiatry 9:705–710
Hansson O, Zetterberg H, Buchhave P, Londos E, Blennow K, Minthon L (2006) Association between CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer’s disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a follow-up study. Lancet Neurol 5:228–234
Hansson O, Buchhave P, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Minthon L, Warkentin S (2009) Combined rCBF and CSF biomarkers predict progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 30:165–173
Hardy JA, Higgins GA (1992) Alzheimer’s disease: the amyloid cascade hypothesis. Science 256:184–185
Hernández F, Avila J (2007) Tauopathies. Cell Mol Life Sci 64:2219–2233
Holmes C, Boche D, Wilkinson D, Yadegarfar G, Hopkins V, Bayer. A, Jones RW, Bullock R, Love S, Neal JW, Zotova E, Nicoll JAR (2008) Long-term effects of Ab42 immunisation in Alzheimer’s disease: follow-up of a randomised, placebo-controlled phase I trial. Lancet 372:216–223
Hye A, Kerr F, Archer N, Foy C, Poppe M, Brown R, Hamilton G, Powell J, Anderton B, Lovestone S (2005) Glycogen synthase kinase-3 is increased in white cells early in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett 373:1–4
Imbimbo BP, Del Giudice. E, Colavito D, D’Arrigo A, Dalle Carbonare M, Villetti G, Facchinetti F, Volta R, Pietrini V, Baroc MF, Serneels L, De Strooper B, Leon A (2007) 1-(3¢,4¢-Dichloro-2-fluoro[1,1¢-biphenyl]-4-yl)-cyclopropanecarboxylic acid (CHF5074), a novel gamma-secretase modulator, reduces brain beta-amyloid pathology in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease without causing peripheral toxicity. J Pharmacol Exp. Ther 323:822–830
Iqbal K, Adel C, Chen S, Chohan MO, El-Akkad E, Gong CX, Khatoon S, Li B, Liu F, Rahman A, Tanimuk H, Grundke-Iqbal I (2005) Tau pathology in Alzheimer disease and other tauopathies. Biochim Biophys Acta 13:198–210
Jack CR, Lowe V, Weigand S, Wiste H, Senjem M, Knopman DS, Shiung M, Gunter J, Boeve B, Kemp B (2009a) Serial PIB and MRI in normal, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: implications for sequence of pathological events in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 132:1355–1365
Jack CR, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Shaw LM, Aisen PS, Weiner MW (2009b) Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol 9:119–128
Johnson GV, Stoothoff WH (2004) Tau phosphorylation in neuronal cell function and dysfunction. J Cell Sci 117:5721–9
Josephs K, Whitwell J, Ahmed Z, Shiung M, Weigand S, Knopman D, Boeve B, Parisi J, Petersen R, Dickson D et al (2008)β-amyloid burden is not associated with rates of brain atrophy. Ann Neurol 63:204–212
Kang J, Lemaire HG, Unterbeck A, Salbaum JM, Masters CL, Grzeschik KH, Multhaup G, Beyreuther K, Müller-Hill B (1987) The precursor of Alzheimer’s disease amyloid A4 protein resembles a cell-surface receptor. Nature 325:733–736
Kemppainen NM, Aalto S, Wilson IA, Nagren K, Helin S, Brack A, Oikonen V, Kailajδrvi M, Scheinin M, Viitanen M et al (2007) PET amyloid ligand [11C]PIB uptake is increased in mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 68:1603–1606
Klunk W, Engler H, Nordberg A, Wang Y, Blomqvist. G, Holt DP, Bergstrφm M, Savitcheva I, Huang GF, Estrada S et al (2004) Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease with Pittsburgh compound-B. Ann Neurol 55:306–319
Knopman DS, Parisi JE, Salviati A, Floriach-Robert M, Boeve BF, Ivnik RJ, Smith GE, Dickson DW, Johnson KA, Petersen LE, McDonald WC, Braak H, Petersen RC (2003) Neuropathology of cognitively normal elderly. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 62:1087–1095
Kosik KS (1993) The molecular and cellular biology fo tau. Brain Path 3:39–43
Kulandaivelu SV, Gopal T (2006) Amyloidogenic processing of b-amyloid precursor protein in intracellular compartments. Neurology 66: S69-S73
Lahiri DK, Chen D, Maloney B, Holloway HW, Yu QS, Utsuki T, Giordano T, Sambamurti K, Greig NH (2007) The experimental Alzheimer’s disease drug posiphen [(+)-phenserine] lowers amyloid-beta peptide levels in cell culture and mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 320:386–396
Lammich S, Kojro E, Postina R, Gilbert S, Pfeiffer R, Jasionowski M, Haass C, Fahrenholz F (1999) Constitutive and regulated alpha-secretase cleavage of Alzheimer’s amyloid precursor protein by a disintegrin metalloprotease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:3922–3927
Lesne S, Kotilinek L (2005) Amyloid plaques and amyloid-b oligomers: an ongoing debate. J Neurosci 25:9319–9320
Levy-Lahad E, Wasco W, Poorkaj P et al (1995) Candidate gene for the chromosome 1 familial Alzheimer’s disease locus. Science 269:973–977
Lichtlen P, Mohajeri MH (2008) Antibody-based approaches in Alzheimer’s research: safety, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and analytical tools. J Neurochem 104:859–874
Lindwall G, Cole RD (1984) Phosphorylation affects the ability of tau protein to promote microtubule assembly. J Biol Chem 259:5301–5305
Lippa CF, Morris JC (2006) Alzheimer neuropathology in nondemented aging: keeping mind over matter. Neurology 66:1801–1802
Lovestone S, Anderton B (1992) Cytoskeletal abnormalities in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Opin Neurol Neurosurg 5:883–888
Lovestone S, Hartley CL, Pearce J, Anderton BH (1997) The psosphorylation of tau: a critiacal stage in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative processes. Neuroscience 78:309–324
Markesbery WR, Schmitt FA, Kryscio RJ, Davis DG, Smith CD, Wekstein DR (2006) Neuropathologic substrate of mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 63:38–46
Mathis C, Wang Y, Holt DP, Huang GF, Debnath ML, Klunk W (2003) Synthesis and evaluation of 11 C-labeled 6-substituted 2-arylbenzothiazoles as amyloid imaging agents. J Med Chem 46:2740–2754
Mattsson N, Zetterberg H, Hansson O, Andreasen N, Parnetti L, Jonsson M et al (2009) CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. JAMA 302:385–393
Mattsson N, Blennow. K, Zetterberg H (2010) Inter-laboratory variation in cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: united we stand, divided we fall. Clin Chem Lab Med 48:603–607
Mattsson N, Andreasson U, Persson S, Arai. H, Batish SD, Bernardini S et al (2011) The Alzheimer’s Association external quality control program for cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. Alzheimers Dement 7:386–95
Mazanetz MP, Fischer PM (2007) Untangling tau hyperphosphorylation in drug design for neurodegenerative diseases. Nature Rev Drug Discov 6:464–479
McKhann GM, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 34:939–944
McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman. BT, Jack CR Jr, Kawas CH, Klunk WE, Koroshetz WJ, Manly JJ, Mayeux R, Mohs RC, Morris JC, Rossor MN, Scheltens P, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Weintraub S, Phelps CH (2011) The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 7:263–269
Mesulam M-M (2000) Aging, Alzheimer’s Disease, and Dementia. Clinical and neuropathological perspectives. In: Mesulam M-M (ed) Principles of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology, 2nd edn. Oxford University, New York
Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel D, Sumi SM, Crain BJ, Brownlee LM, Vogel FS, Hughes JP, van Belle G, Berg L (1991) The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part II. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 41:479–486
Mohajeri MH (2008) Antibody-based approaches in Alzheimer’s research: safety, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and analytical tools. J Neurochem 104:859–874
Moller HJ, Graeber MB (1998) The case described by Alois Alzheimer in 1911. Historical and conceptual perspectives based on the clinical record and neurohistological sections. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 248:111–122
Morgan D, Diamond DM, Gottschall PE, Ugen KE, Dickey C, Hardy J, Duff K, Jantzen P, DiCarlo G, Wilcock D, Connor K, Hatcher J, Hope C, Gordon M, Arendash GW (2000) A beta peptide vaccination prevents memory loss in an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 408:982–985
Morishima-Kawashima M, Oshima N, Ogata H, Yamaguchi H, Yoshimura M, Sugihara S, Ihara Y (2000) Effect of apolipoprotein E allele epsilon4 on the initial phase of amyloid beta-protein accumulation in the human brain. Am J Pathol 157:2093–2099
Murrell J, Farlow M, Ghetti B, Benson MD (1991) A mutation in the amyloid precursor protein associated with hereditary Alzheimer’s disease. Science 254:97–99
National Institute of Aging/Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the Neuropathological Assessment of AD (2011) http://www.alz.org/ documents. Accessed 17 Sept 2011
Nicoll JA, Wilkinson D, Holmes C, Steart P, Markham H, Weller RO (2003) Neuropathology of human Alzheimer disease after immunization with amyloid-beta peptide: a case report. Nature Med 9:448–452
Oide T, Kinoshita T, Arima K (2006) Regression stage senile plaques in the natural course of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 32:539–556
Okello A, Koivunen J, Edison P, Archer HA, Turkheimer FE, Nagren K, Bullock R, Walker Z, Kennedy A, Fox NC, Rossor MN, Rinne JO, Brooks DJ (2009) Conversion of amyloid positive and negative MCI to AD over 3 years: an 11C-PIB PET study. Neurology 73:754–760
Orgogozo JM, Gilman S, Dartigues JF, Laurent B, Puel M, Kirby LC, Jouanny P, Dubois B, Eisner L, Flitman S, Michel BF, Boada M, Frank A, Hock C (2003) Subacute meningoencephalitis in a subset of patients with AD after Abeta42 immunization. Neurology 61:46–54
Panza F, Solfrizzi V, Frisardi V, Capurso C, D’Introno A, Colacicco AM, Vendemiale G, Capurso A, Imbimbo BP (2009) Disease-modifying approach to the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: from alpha-secretase activators to gamma-secretase inhibitors and modulators. Drugs Aging 26:537–555
Peskind ER, Ge LI, Shofer J, Quinn JF, Kaye JA,2006 Time will be of the essence in treating Alzheimer disease. JAMA 296:327–329
Petot GJ, Friedland RP (2004) Lipids, diet and Alzheimer disease: an extended summary. J Neurol Sci 226:31–33
Recuero M, Serrano E, Bullido MJ, Valdivieso F (2004) Abeta production as consequence of cellular death of a human neuroblastoma overexpressing APP. FEBS Lett 570:114–118
Reiber H (2001) Dynamics of brain-derived proteins in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Chim Acta 310:173–186
Reiman EM, Chen K, Liu X, Bandy D, Yu M, Lee W, Ayutyanont N, Keppler J, Reeder SA, Langbaum JB et al (2009) Fibrillar amyloid-beta burden in cognitively normal people at 3 levels of genetic risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:6820–6825
Rentz DM, Locascio JJ, Becker JA, Moran EK, Eng E, Buckner RL, Sperling RA, Johnson KA (2010) Cognition, reserve, and amyloid deposition in normal aging. Ann Neurol 67:353–364
Resnick SM, Sojkova J, Zhou Y, An Y, Ye W, Holt DP, Dannals RF, Mathis C, Klunk W, Ferrucci L et al (2010) Longitudinal cognitive decline is associated with fibrillar amyloid-beta measured by [11C]PiB. Neurology 74:807–815
Rhein V, Eckert A (2007) Effects of Alzheimer’s amyloid-beta and tau protein on mitochondrial function--role of glucose metabolism and insulin signalling. Arch Physiol Biochem 113:131–141
Riemenschneider M, Lautenschlager N, Wagenpfeil S, Diehl J, Drzezga A, Kurz A (2002) Cerebrospinal fluid tau and beta-amyloid 42 proteins identify Alzheimer disease in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 59:1729–1734
Rinne JO, Brooks DJ, Rossor MN, Fox NC, Bullock R, Klunk WE, Mathis CA, Blennow K, Barakos J, Okello AA, Rodriguez MLS, Liu E, Koller M, Gregg KM, Schenk D, Black R, Grundman M (2010) 11C-PiB PET assessment of change in fibrillar amyloid-beta load in patients with Alzheimer’s disease treated with bapineuzumab: a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose study. Lancet Neurol 9:363–372
Roberts GW, Gentleman SM, Lynch A, Murray L, Landon M, Graham DI (1994) Beta amyloid protein deposition in the brain after severe head injury: implications for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 57:419–425
Roe CM, Xiong C, Miller JP, Morris JC (2007) Education and Alzheimer disease without dementia: support for the cognitive reserve hypothesis. Neurology 68:223–228
Roher AE, Maarouf CL, Daugs ID, Kokjohn TA, Hunter JM, Sabbagh MN, Beach TG (2011) Neuropathology and amyloid-b spectrum in a bapineuzumab immunotherapy recipient. J Alzheimers Dis 24:315–325
Rowe CC, Ackerman U, Browne W, Mulligan R, Pike KL, O’Keefe G, Tochon-Danguy H, Chan G, Berlangieri SU, Jones G et al (2008) Imaging of amyloid beta in Alzheimer’s disease with 18F-BAY94-9172, a novel PET tracer: proof of mechanism. Lancet Neurol 7:129–135
Salloway S, Sperling R, Gilman S, Fox NC, Blennow K, Raskind M, Sabbagh M, Honig LS, Doody R, van Dyck CH, Mulnard R, Barakos J, Gregg KM, Liu E, Lieberburg I, Schenk D, Black R, Grundman M, Bapineuzumab (2009) 201 Clinical Trial Investigators. A phase 2 multiple ascending dose trial of bapineuzumab in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Neurology 73:2061–2070
Sanz-Blasco S, Valero RA, Rodríguez-Crespo I, Villalobos C, Núñez L (2008) Mitochondrial Ca2+ overload underlies Abeta oligomers neurotoxicity providing an unexpected mechanism of neuroprotection by NSAIDs. PLoS ONE 3:e2718
Scarmeas N, Stern Y (2003) Cognitive reserve and lifestyle. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 25:625–633
Schmitt HP (2006) Protein ubiquitination, degradation and the proteasome in neuro-degenerative disorders: No clear evidence for a significant pathogenetic role of proteasome failure in Alzheimer disease and related disorders. Medical Hypotheses 1:311–317
Schneider JA, Aggarwal NT, Barnes L, Boyle P, Bennett DA (2009a) The neuropathology of older persons with and without dementia from community versus clinic cohorts. J Alzheimers Dis 18:691–701
Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA (2009b) Mixed pathologies in probable Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol 66:200–208
Selkoe DJ (1991) Amyloid protein and Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Am 265:68–71, 74–76, 78
Serrano-Pozo A, William CM, Ferrer I, Uro-Coste E, Delisle MB, Maurage CA, Hock C, Nitsch RM, Masliah E, Growdon JH, Frosch MP, Hyman BT (2010) Beneficial effect of human anti-amyloid-beta active immunization on neurite morphology and tau pathology. Brain 133:1312–1327
Shahani N, Brandt R (2002) Functions and malfunctions of the tau proteins. Cell Mol Life Sci 39:1668–1680
Shaw L, Vanderstichele H, Knapik-Czajka M, Clark C, Aisen P, Petersen R, Blennow K, Soares H, Simon A, Lewczuk P et al (2009) Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative subjects. Ann Neurol 65:403–413
Sherrington R, Rogaev EI, Liang Y et al (1995) Cloning of a gene bearing missense mutations in early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 375:754–760
Siemers ER, Quinn JF, Kaye J, Farlow MR, Porsteinsson A, Tariot P, Zoulnouni P, Galvin JE, Holtzman DM, Knopman DS, Satterwhite J, Gonzales C, Dean RA, May PC (2006) Effects of a gamma-secretase inhibitor in a randomized study of patients with Alzheimer disease. Neurology 66:602–604
Small GW, Kepe V, Ercoli LM, Siddarth P, Bookheimer SY, Miller KJ, Lavretsky H, Burggren AC, Cole GM, Vinters H et al (2006) PET of brain amyloid and tau in mild cognitive impairment. New Engl J Med 355:2652–2663
Sonnen JA, Larson EB, Crane PK, Haneuse S, Li G, Schellenberg GD, Craft S, Leverenz JB, Montine TJ (2007) Pathological correlates of dementia in a longitudinal, population based sample of aging. Ann Neurol 62:406–413
Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM, Iwatsubo T, Jack CR Jr, Kaye J, Montine TJ, Park DC, Reiman EM, Rowe CC, Siemers E, Stern Y, Yaffe K, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Morrison-Bogorad M, Wagster MV, Phelps CH (2011) Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 7:280–292
Sunderland T, Linker G, Mirza N, Putnam KT, Friedman DL, Kimmel LH et al (2003) Decreased beta-amyloid1–42 and increased tau levels in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer disease. JAMA 289:2094–2103
Swerdlow RH (2007a) Is aging part of Alzheimer’s disease, or is Alzheimer’s disease part of aging? Neurobiol Aging 28:1465–1480
Swerdlow RH (2007b) Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Interv Aging 2:347–359
Tapiola T, Alafuzoff I, Herukka SK, Parkkinen L, Hartikainen P, Soininen H, Pirttilä T (2009) Cerebrospinal fluid {beta}-amyloid 42 and tau proteins as biomarkers of Alzheimer-type pathologic changes in the brain. Arch Neurol 66:382–389
Thal DR, Rub U, Orantes M, Braak H (2002) Phases of Abeta-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology 58:1791–1800
Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM, Dawbarn D, Allen SJ (1994) The kinase connection in Paired helical filament tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol 144:449–453
Tupler LA, Krishnan KR, Greenberg DL, Marcovina SM, Payne ME, MacFall JR, Charles HC, Doraiswamy PM (2007) Predicting memory decline in normal elderly: genetics, MRI, and cognitive reserve. Neurobiol Aging 28:1644–1656
Vieira MN, Forny-Germano L, Saraiva LM, Sebollela A, Martinez AM, Houzel JC, De Felice FG, Ferreira ST (2007) Soluble oligomers from a non-disease related protein mimic Abeta-induced tau hyperphosphorylation and neurodegeneration. J Neurochem 103:736–48
Villemagne V, Pike KE, Darby D, Maruff P, Savage G, Ackermann U, Cowie TF, Currie, J, Chan, SG et al (2008) Abeta deposits in older non-demented individuals with cognitive decline are indicative of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia 46:1688–1697
Wagner JA (2009) Biomarkers: principles, policies, and practice. Clin Pharmacol Ther 86:3–7
Wang JZ, Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K (2007) Kinases and phosphatases and tau sites involved in Alzheimer neurofibrillary degeneration. Eur J Neurosci 25:59–68
Wilson RS, Mendes de Leon CF, Barnes LL, Schneider JA, Bienias JL, Evans DA, Bennett DA (2002) Participation in cognitively stimulating activities and risk of incident AD. JAMA 287:742–748
Wiltfang J, Lewczuk P, Riederer P, Granblatt E, Hock C, Scheltens P, Hampel H, Vanderstichele H, Iqbal K, Galasko D et al (2005) Consensus paper of the WFSBP task force on biological markers of dementia: the role of CSF and blood analysis in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia. World J Biol Psychiatry 6:69–84
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De-Paula, V.J., Radanovic, M., Diniz, B., Forlenza, O. (2012). Alzheimer’s Disease. In: Harris, J. (eds) Protein Aggregation and Fibrillogenesis in Cerebral and Systemic Amyloid Disease. Subcellular Biochemistry, vol 65. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5416-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5416-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5415-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5416-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)