Abstract
The Brazilian savanna, known as the Cerrado, extending over 200 million ha, is the largest neotropical savanna in the Americas. With its ongoing conversion to intensive agriculture since the 1960s, of which cultivated pastures for beef cattle production is a major form, this unique ecosystem is now considered threatened. Given the recognized role of trees in carbon (C) sequestration and greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation, the silvopastoral system of tree plantation development on pasture lands is considered to be particularly relevant to this region. For the past two decades, eucalyptus-based silvopastoral systems have been established in the Cerrado region by growing agricultural crops (rice and soybean) in the first 2 years followed by Brachiaria forage and beef-cattle grazing from the third year of plantation establishment. Recent studies in a variety of situations indicate that agroforestry systems store higher amounts of C compared to single species cropping and grazing systems, both aboveground and belowground. The Brazilian savannas that have characteristically low aboveground C reserves hold considerable stocks of soil organic C, probably as a consequence of previous land use, the history of which is unknown. Most of this C is in a biodegradable form and is likely to be lost to the atmosphere when the soil is disturbed during land conversion to agriculture and pasture. Adoption of sustainable land use systems such as silvopasture could reduce this potential hazard. Given the role of the Cerrado in the global C cycle and climatic change, these issues deserve well coordinated investigations.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
Silvopasture refers to the agroforestry practice of integrating trees in animal production systems. Broadly, there are two major forms of silvopasture: grazing and tree fodder systems. In grazing systems, cattle are allowed to graze on pasture under widely spaced or scattered trees, whereas in the tree fodder systems, the animals are stall-fed with fodder from trees or shrubs grown in blocks on farms (Nair 1993; Nair et al. 2008). The grazing system of silvopasture has recently gained prominence as an ecologically sustainable and environmentally desirable approach to managing degraded pasture lands in the industrialized countries (Mosquera-Losada et al. 2005; Garrett 2009). With the recent emphasis on the environmental impact of land use systems, the role of silvopasture and other agroforestry practices in mitigating climate change through carbon (C) sequestration has been a major area of research focus (Nair et al. 2010).
The silvopastoral system of tree plantation development on pasture lands and its role in C sequestration and greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation are particularly relevant to Brazil, where land use changes in forestry and agricultural sectors are reported to be responsible for more than two-thirds of the GHG emissions (Comunicação Nacional 2004). For example, most of the agricultural areas in the vast Brazilian savanna, known as the Cerrado, are grasslands, of which at least 60% are in some stage of degradation (IBGE 2006). This paper presents an overview of the status of silvopasture in Brazil, and a summary of some recent studies on C sequestration in silvopastoral systems in Florida (USA), Minas Gerais (Brazil), and northwestern and Central Spain. With that background, we will present some perspectives on the GHG – primarily C dioxide (CO2) – mitigation potential of silvopasture systems in the Brazilian Cerrado, and relate them to other similar ecosystems elsewhere.
Silvopasture in the Brazilian Savanna (Cerrado)
Brazil has a cattle population of 200 million on 100 million ha of cultivated pastures (IBGE 2006). Of these, beef production involves 180 million head, producing 8.0 Tg of meat per year. Growing national and international markets for meat and demand for better quality of meat necessitate important changes to a production system that relies largely on pasture, the production capacity of which has been depleted following years of exploitation. In the Cerrado region of Brazil, cultivated pastures cover about 49 million ha, supporting a herd of 40 million head representing more than 35% of the total Brazilian beef production. Thus, the region accounts for 35–40% of the beef cattle industry both in area and production.
The Cerrado
Savannas are a major component of the world’s vegetation, covering one-sixth of the land surface, and accounting for 30% of the primary production of all terrestrial vegetation (Grace et al. 2006). In South America the savanna, mostly distributed in Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela, and Bolivia, feeds three of the major water basins: the Amazon, Paraguay, and São Francisco Rivers (Cochrane et al. 1985). The Brazilian savanna, called the Cerrado (Fig. 1), occurs manly in central Brazil in the states of Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Tocantins, Goias, and western parts of Minas Gerais, and extends over 200 million ha (Batlle-Bayer et al. 2010). The Cerrado is a wet savanna and it consists of a gradient of physiognomies, from grassland (called “campo limpo”) to a sclerophylous forest (Cerradão), with over 10,000 species of plants, of which 45% are unique to the Cerrado.
The Cerrado region’s typical climate is hot, semi-humid, with pronounced seasonality marked by a dry winter season from May through October. The annual rainfall ranges from 1,200 to 2,000 mm, 80–90% of which occurs during the summer (known, rightly, as the rainy) season between October and April. The mean annual temperature varies from 22°C in the south to 27°C in the north of the region (Bustamante et al. 2006). The soils are generally very old, deep, and inherently poor in nutrients such as phosphorus and calcium. They have high levels of aluminum and low levels of organic matter and pH. Oxisols and Entisols represent approximately 46% and 15% of the area, respectively (Reatto et al. 1998). Due to their low nutrient status and high acidity and aluminum concentration, soil organic matter (SOM) plays a particularly important role in the physical, chemical, and biological processes related to nutrient cycling, soil aggregation, and plant-water availability in the Cerrado (Resck 1998). The Cerrado trees have characteristic twisted trunks covered by a thick bark, and leaves, which are usually broad and rigid. Many herbaceous plants have extensive roots to store water and nutrients. The plant’s thick bark and roots serve as adaptations for the periodic fires that sweep the Cerrado landscape. The adaptations protect the plants from destruction and make them capable of sprouting again after the fire.
The Cerrado region has been the focus of intense agricultural expansion since the 1960s, and a large area of native vegetation has been replaced by agriculture, cultivated pastures, and planted forests.Footnote 1 Satellite images showed that in 2002, 55% of the Cerrado had already been transformed (Machado et al. 2004). During the period from 1975 to 1995, the area under crop cultivation in the Cerrado increased from 6.9 to 8.2 million ha (Bustamante et al. 2006). The major crops are soybean (Glycine max L. Merr), maize (Zea mays L.), rice (Oryza sativa L.), and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Soybean is the most important crop and it had its “boom” in the 1980s propelled by growing international demand for it. Cultivated pastures account for the largest agricultural expansion, mostly with the introduction of the African grass of the genus Brachiaria. Estimate of the pasture area in the Cerrado ranges from 35 to 50 million ha (Sano et al. 2000). Most of these cultivated pastures have, however, experienced some degree of degradation; they have lost, to some extent, their capacity to produce biomass due to deterioration of soil chemical, physical, and biological conditions.
Various types of landholdings and producers can be found in the Cerrado biome, ranging from large farms with areas of more than 20,000 ha and a variety of crop fields or cattle, to a large number of “small” farms with areas less than 100 ha. Planted forests are a relatively new land use system in this area that has gained popularity within the last decade; pasture lands are now being rapidly converted by interplanting with fast growing tree species. Large tracts of the Cerrado have also been planted to fast growing trees, especially eucalyptus hybrids (Eucalyptus spp.) and pines (Pinus spp.), which account for roughly two-thirds and one-third, respectively, of the approximately 5.5 million ha of planted forests in Brazil (ABRAF 2008). Most of these plantations have been planted over the small farmlands that used to raise cattle. This new development, motivated primarily by its monetary advantages, has brought up two major issues: the introduction of non-native tree species in the biome, and the decline – if not elimination – of the traditional activity of cattle rearing. Integrating cattle and trees as in silvopastoral systems offer the advantages of monetary benefits from planted forests and at the same time supports cattle rearing. There might be unexplored advantages via C sequestration too.
Silvopastoral Systems in the Cerrado
Silvopastoral systems were first established in the Cerrado region of Minas Gerais State about 20 years ago and the area under the practice has been increasing steadily since then. Accurate data on the spread of the system are not available; however, the current area under the practice is estimated to be about 14,000 ha (based on the authors’ personal contact with local farms). Other areas of the Cerrado have also been cultivated with silvopastoral systems, mainly in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul. It is perceived (Dubé et al. 2000) that the establishment of silvopastoral systems can reduce the cost of establishment of the whole (beef + timber) system; furthermore, the additional income derived from the crops would be an economic incentive to tree plantation owners during the early years of plantation establishment.
The silvopastoral systems in the Cerrado are established by cultivating one or two annual crops in rows in between the widely-spaced tree rows. Crops such as rice and soybean are cultivated in the first and second year, respectively, after establishing eucalyptus (Fig. 2), the most common tree used in the system. It is planted at the spacing of 10 × 4 m or 8 × 4 m. Tree rows are aligned, as much as possible, in the east-west orientation in order to allow highest extent of light penetration to the understory grass between trees. Most planters limit the soil preparation for silvopastoral establishment to the minimum, mainly spot application of herbicides to kill weeds or any undesirable plant in the rows where the trees will be planted. This minimum soil preparation is important to avoid soil disturbance and oxidation of SOM. Soil moisture availability and mild temperature under trees create better condition for mineralization of nitrogen (N) which contributes to improving and extending the forage quality in the dry season. In the third year, seeds of the grass Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. Ex A. Rich.) Stapf, are sown to constitute the understory (Fig. 3). Sixty days after sowing the grass seeds, beef cattle are stocked in the area for grazing (Fig. 4).
In spite of the steady increase in the area under silvopasture in Brazil, information about beef cattle production under these systems is relatively scanty. A pioneering example of the system, which contributed to studies and popularization of this technology, is the “Fazenda Riacho” (Riacho Farm), an agroforestry unit of the Votorantim Siderurgia group, located in the Cerrado region of Minas Gerais. Bernardino et al. (2011) studying the beef cattle performance in the silvopastoral system in this farm reported that fertilizing the understory grass (B. brizantha) with N and potassium (K) resulted in increase in higher grass dry matter production and higher meat production per ha; on average, the increase in the animal live weight gain (LWG) was directly proportional to the fertilizer rates used. Fertilization with N and K is considered important in the establishment and management of silvopastoral system in the Brazilian Cerrado (Andrade et al. 2001; Bernardino 2008). Other studies are currently under way to evaluate the effects of doses and sources of N on the productivity of the understory in silvopastoral systems.
An alternative to the use of inorganic fertilizers is the introduction of forage legumes to constitute part of the understory in silvopastoral systems. Legumes can add N to the system and thus reduce the cost of N input as well as the environmental hazard associated with fertilizer N. They can also enhance the forage quality, resulting in better cattle performance. Paciullo et al. (2004, personal communication)Footnote 2 evaluated the weight gain of dairy heifer grazing a silvopastoral system with three different tree species and an understory of Brachiaria decumbens Stapf. and Stylosanthes guianensis (Aubl.) Sw. and a pasture with the same grass species. They reported that, while no differences were found between silvopastoral system and grassland in the rainy season, a 40% gain in the heifer weight was noticed under silvopasture in the dry season. Alvim et al. (2005) also found a better weight gain in the dry season for heifers grazing in the understory of a silvopastoral system when compared to B. decumbens pasture.
Several studies have indicated the potential of silvopastoral system in beef-cattle production in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. Silva (1998) evaluated the effect of two densities of Eucalyptus saligna Sm. plantations, spaced 2 × 3 m and 2 × 6 m (1,666 and 833 trees ha–1) and three forage offers (6.0, 9.6, and 13.0%) on the beef cattle performance, and found that the highest LWG per ha 215 kg, in the medium (9.6%) forage offer and lowest tree density (833 trees ha–1). Furthermore, Silva et al. (2001) studied the animal performance, stocking rate, and the residual forage in a silvopastoral system with acacia negra (Acacia mearnsii De Wild.) spaced 2 × 3 m and 2 × 5 m and two understory species (B. brizantha cv. Marandu and Panicum maximum Jacq. cv. Gatton). The best results for LWG, animal gain per ha, and stocking rate were obtained with lower tree density, for both understory species. Lucas (2004) studying a silvopastoral system with acacia negra at a stand density of 500 trees ha–1 and understory of P. maximum cv. Gatton, established for 8 years and grazed during 445 days, found a total LWG of 747 kg ha–1 (average of 1.8 kg–1 ha–1 grazing day–1). These results show a high contrast with the average LWG productivity of 50 kg–1 ha–1 year–1 of the traditional extensive grazing based on native pasture in Rio Grande do Sul State.
Research Results on Carbon Sequestration in Silvopastoral Systems
During the past few years, the University of Florida (UF) Center for Subtropical Agroforestry (CSTAF) has been involved in soil C sequestration studies under a range of agroforestry systems and related land use systems (Nair et al. 2010). The overall objectives were to quantify soil organic matter (SOC) accumulation and sequestration in different types of agroforestry systems in a variety of ecological and geographical conditions, determine C storage in different soil fractions up to at least 1-m depth, and quantify, wherever possible, C contribution by C3 and C4 plants (∼ trees and herbaceous plants) using natural C isotopic differences between the two groups. The studies included silvopastoral systems in three countries, under different agroecological conditions (Table 1). Detailed descriptions of climate and soil conditions, land use systems, and their management are reported in specific papers published from each study. Briefly, the Florida sites included a silvopasture with slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) and adjacent treeless bahiagrass pasture (Paspalum notatum Flüggé). In Spain, two silvopastoral systems were studied: a simulated silvopasture with pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) or birch (Betula pendula Roth) with Dactylis spp./Trifolium spp. in between, with an adjacent treeless pasture on Inceptisols in northwestern Spain; and a traditional dehesa silvopastoral system with cork oak trees (Quercus suber L.) on Alfisols in central Spain. In the dehesa system, total C stock was determined near (2 m) and away (15 m) from the tree. The study sites in Minas Gerais, Brazil, included a eucalyptus silvopasture system (Eucalyptus spp. with understory of Brachiaria spp. as fodder grass) compared with a pasture system and an adjacent forest stand. The soil orders of the study sites included Spodosols and Ultisols (both in Florida, USA), Inceptisols (northwestern Spain), Alfisols (central Spain), and Oxisols (Minas Gerais, Brazil). At each location, soils were sampled to at least 1-m depth from four to six layers (sampling depths) according to replicated experimental design procedures. All soil samples from the different sites were fractionated into three different aggregate-size fractions [macro (2,000–250 μm), micro (250–53 μm), and silt- and clay- sized fractions (<53 μm)], and the C content in each fraction was determined by dry combustion using an automated C analyzer (Thermo Finnegan Flash EA 1112 NC; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Waltham, MA, USA).
The total SOC varied considerably within the different systems to a meter depth suggesting differences in C sequestration potential that reflects climatic conditions, soil types, and the plant species (Fig. 5). The highest SOC stock to a meter depth was in the Oxisols of Brazil (∼ 400 Mg ha–1: Tonucci et al. 2011) and the lowest SOC was in the sparsely tree-dominated locations of the dehesa system in central Spain (Mean: 31 Mg ha–1; Howlett 2009).
In the Florida study, silvopastures had greater amounts of SOC stored within a meter soil profile compared to adjacent treeless pastures (Fig. 6). Using stable C isotope signatures, Haile et al. (2010) showed that C in the deeper soil profile was derived from the tree component, i.e. the slash pine of the silvopastoral system. Further, the relatively stable C fraction (<53 μm) was found to be derived from the tree component (Haile et al. 2010). In the study in central and northwestern Spain, the traditional dehesa (cork oak) silvopastoral system with sparse tree density had lower SOC in the whole soil compared to the managed silvopasture system with higher tree density (Fig. 7). Within the dehesa system of central Spain, the soil near the tree, compared to that away from the tree, stored more C. In pasture system in Minas Gerais, the AFS (eucalyptus-based silvopasture) had the highest SOC content in the macro-sized- and silt + clay- sized fractions compared with the forest- and pasture soils (Fig. 8).
In addition to the above (silvopastoral) studies, similar studies were conducted in three other countries: in the homegardens in Kerala, India (Saha et al. 2009, 2010); parkland- and other systems in Mali, West Africa (Takimoto et al. 2008, 2009); and shaded cacao systems in comparison with adjacent natural forest in southeast Bahia, Brazil (Gama-Rodrigues et al. 2010). The results from these multi-location (five-country) studies showed that:
-
1.
The amount of C stored in soils depends on soil qualities, especially silt + clay content
-
2.
Tree-based systems, compared to treeless systems, store more C in deeper soil layers under comparable conditions
-
3.
Higher SOC content is associated with higher species richness and tree density
-
4.
Soil near the tree, compared to away from the tree, stores more C
Furthermore, C3 plants (trees) were found to contribute to more stable C in the soil than C4 plants (grasses) in deeper soil profiles in Florida soils (Spodosols and Ultisols); but this was not the case in the Cerrado soils (Oxisols).
In spite of the limitations of the separate studies upon which this analysis is based, the results show the intrinsic differences and enormous variations in soil C stock among different soils orders and land use systems. Although the studies at the different locations were not designed specifically to compare C stock across soil orders under similar ecological and management conditions, a general trend of higher C stock in soils containing higher amounts of clay and silt was evident. Among the agroforestry and other systems studied, the differences in C stock are up to more than 100-fold. While much of these differences can be attributed to the type of land use systems and ecological regions, there are clear differences among land use systems within the same ecological regions and soil orders. In general, tree-based agricultural systems, compared to treeless systems, store more C. Furthermore, land use history of the site seems to have a major and overriding role in determining the amount of C stored in the soils, such that the previous land use history of a site has the most effect than any other factor in determining the C content in that soil.
In summary, available results indicate that AFS store higher amounts of C, compared to single species cropping and grazing systems, in both aboveground and belowground compartments of the system. The C sequestration potential of AFS seems especially significant in the soil, particularly in soil depths below 50 cm (Nair et al. 2010). The extent of C sequestration will, obviously, depend on a number of site-specific factors as well as system management.
Some Perspectives on Silvopasture and Carbon Sequestration in the Cerrado
Grasslands that cover nearly three billion hectare globally, with roughly two-thirds in the tropics and one-third in the temperate region, constitute a major ecosystem of the world. Being semiarid lands, they are resource limited, especially in N and water. Silvopastoralism is a major land use system in the savannas, with extensive grazing under dispersed stands of indigenous trees in the vast African savanna.
Disastrous consequences of human efforts to modify these fragile ecosystems have been exemplified by the recent experiences from intensive cattle production supported by planted pasture in the Cerrado. During the past few decades, the Cerrado ecosystem has undergone extensive degradation because of conversion to agriculture, and this process continues unabated. The increasing demand for dairy products and beef for export markets has led to conversion of large areas of native land to cattle pasture in the Cerrado. From the 1970s, the native savanna grasslands were replaced by cultivated pastures, mostly Brachiaria species. Best pasture management practices are aimed at maintaining productivity and full soil cover by adjusting stocking rates to avoid overgrazing and application of fertilizer and lime as required. In general, however, after a few years of pasture establishment, stocking rates are increased without paying adequate attention to pasture management including fertilization, leading to a rapid nutrient-depletion and pasture degradation. As a result, the pastures become degraded within 3–4 years to the extent of being unable to support even average stocking rates. More than 60% of the pastures in the Cerrado are degraded (Batlle-Bayer et al. 2010), and the Cerrado is now regarded as a threatened biome (Cardoso da Silva and Bates 2002; Boddey et al. 2004): an unfortunate but revealing example of an ecological disaster caused by human intervention.
Although liming and fertilization have been recommended for reclaiming the degraded pastures (de Oliveira et al. 2004), the high cost of production and transport, and the high environmental cost associated with these practices make them unattractive options. Introduction of N-fixing legumes in association with improved grasses, and integrated crop-livestock-management systems have been proposed for sustaining grassland productivity in the Cerrado region, but have not yet been widely adopted, partly because the legume + grass mixture of understory could not be sustained for long. Worldwide, improved grassland management (e.g., application of fertilizers, adapted stocking rates, introduction of legumes and irrigation) is reported to have the potential to lead to a significant soil C sink (Conant et al. 2001). However, such results have to be viewed with caution, because many of them have used the degraded pasture system as ‘baseline’ for the comparison and not the native Cerrado ecosystem.
The Brazilian savannas have small aboveground C reserves compared to forest biomes; but their soils hold considerable stocks of organic C. Bustamante et al. (2006) estimated that soils of the Cerrado region contained an average stock of 117 (range: 100–174) Mg C ha–1 (for native Cerrados). In a review of changes in organic C stocks upon land use conversion in the Cerrado, Battle-Bayer (2010) cited reports of SOC stocks ranging from 123 to 209 Mg C ha–1 from different locations in the Cerrado. Our own studies (Tonucci et al. 2011) have shown much higher stock of C in the Cerrado soils (Table 2, Fig. 8). It has also been suggested that the land use history of the site could have a major influence on C stock and distribution of C in different size-fractions under in different land use systems. The Cerrado has only recently (four decades) been opened up for conversion to agricultural/livestock/forestry purposes. Unfortunately no information could be obtained about the previous site history dating back to 200 years or more. A preliminary evaluation using 14C dating technique in soils of the forest, pasture and silvopasture sites used in the study sites of Tonucci et al. (2011) suggested the possibility that the Cerrado region had previously been under a “high-C-storing” system for a long time (Tonucci et al., personal communication: September 2010). The δ14C values for various soil depth classes under different land use systems studied by Tonucci et al. (unpublished data) suggest that the organic matter in the surface soil of these systems was of recent addition whereas the C in the lower soil layers had been stored for much longer time periods. These results, although preliminary, suggest that the Cerrado soils stock high amounts of C derived possibly from previous land use, the details of which are unknown. The bottom line is that the Cerrado biome has a high stock of C in soil, probably as a consequence of previous land use; most of this C is in a biodegradable form, and could be lost to the atmosphere with soil disturbance. Adoption of sustainable land use systems such as silvopasture could reduce this potential hazard. These concerns call for well coordinated and detailed investigations on this important issue.
Conclusions
Our studies, though limited, suggest that if sustainable silvopastoral systems could be developed as alternatives to conversion of forest lands to support animal production, the high levels of C footprint of animal production in developing countries could be reduced considerably. Between the two forms of savanna conversions – to produce grass and grain – the former, however, is a lesser evil environmentally, and grass-fed beef, which is far more efficient in overall energy use than grain-fed beef, would leave a lesser C footprint than intensive grain production systems including the grain-based beef. Thus, shifting from input-intensive pasture- and grain production to environment-friendly silvopastoral systems could reduce GHG emission, promote C sequestration in soils, and enhance the soil’s resilience by increasing the SOC pool.
Although the Cerrado is a unique ecosystem, many of these projections and perspectives could be applicable to other savanna regions too. The extent to which these results are applicable in the savannas of other continents such as Africa and Asia is unclear, because of not only the differences in soils and other ecological conditions, but also the vast differences in management systems. In most parts of the African and Asian savannas, silvopastoralism consists mostly of extensive animal grazing in open lands with scattered trees with practically no land use intensification involving fertilizers and such external inputs, unlike in the fertilized and management-intensive silvopasture in the Cerrado. Nevertheless, results from the extensive dehesa silvopasture system of Spain as well as other studies from the Parklands (extensive, open grazing) system in Mali, West Africa, indicate the positive role of trees in SOC build-up. Given that globally the savanna ecosystem covers a sixth of the total land area and account for a third of total plant production, the role of savanna silvopastoral systems in global C sequestration and climate change mitigation deserve serious investigation. With the increased awareness of the role of savannas, the Cerrado in particular, in the global C cycle and climate change, the international community has a stake in such efforts.
Notes
- 1.
EMBRAPA CERRADO (1999).
- 2.
Paciullo DSP, Aroeira LJM, Viana AF, Malaquias JD, Rodrigues NM, Carvalho CAB, Costa FJN, and Verneque RS (2004) Desempenho de novilhas mestiças Europeu x Zebu, mantidas em sistemas silvipastoril ou em monocultura de Braquiária. In: Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, Campo Grande, SBZ, CD-ROM.
References
ABRAF (2008) Associação Brasileira de Produtores de Florestas Plantadas. Censo Florestal de 2008. São Paulo, SP, 90 p. Available at http://www.abraflor.org.br/estatisticas/ABRAF08-EN.pdf. Accessed Jan 2011
Alvim MJ, Carvalho MM, Botrel MA, Pires MFA (2005) Ganho de peso vivo de novilhas leiteiras em sistemas silvipastoril e em pastagem de Brachiaria decumbens. In: Reunión de la Associación Latinoamericana de Producción Animal 19, Tampico, Brazil, pp 20–22
Andrade CMS, Garcia R, Couto L (2001) Fatores limitantes ao crescimento do capimtanzânia em um sistema agrossilvipastoril com eucalipto, na região dos cerrados de Minas Gerais. Rev Bras Zootecn 30:1178–1185
Batlle-Bayer L, Batjes NH, Bindraban PS (2010) Changes in organic carbon stocks upon land use conversion in the Brazilian Cerrado: a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 137:47–58
Bernardino FS, Tonucci RG, Garcia R, Neves JCL, Rocha GC (2011) Produção de forragem e desempenho de novilhos de corte em um sistema silvipastoril: efeito de doses de nitrogênio e oferta de forragem. Rev Bras Zootecn (in press)
Boddey RM, Macedo R, Tarre´ RM, Ferreira E, de Oliveira OC, de Rezende C, Cantarutti RB, Pereira JM, Alves BJR, Urquiaga S (2004) Nitrogen cycling in Brachiaria pastures: the key to understanding the process of pasture decline. Agric Ecosyst Environ 103:389–403
Bustamante MMC, Corbeels M, Scopel E, Roscoe R (2006) Soil carbon storage and sequestration potential in the Cerrado region of Brazil. In: Lal R, Cerri CC, Bernoux M, Etchevers J, Cerri CEP (eds) Carbon sequestration in soils of latin America. Food Products Press, Binghamton, pp 28–43
Cardoso da Silva JM, Bates JM (2002) Biogeographic patterns and conservation in the South American cerrado: a tropical savanna hotspot. Bioscience 52:225–234
Cochrane TT, Azevedo LG, Thomas D, Madeira Neto J, Adamoli J, Verdesio JJ (1985) Land use and productive potential of American savannas. In: Tothill J, Mott JC (eds) International savanna symposium 1984. Australian Academy Science, Canberra, pp 114–124
Comunicação Nacional (2004) Comunicação nacional inicial do Brasil à conservação – quadro das nações unidas sobre mudanças do clima. Coordenação-Geral de Mudanças Globais de Clima. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia, Brasília, Brasil, 74 p
Conant RT, Paustian K, Elliott ET (2001) Grassland management and conversion intro grassland: effects on soil carbon. Ecol Appl 11:343–355
de Oliveira OC, de Oliveira IP, Alves BJR, Urquiaga S, Boddey RM (2004) Chemical and biological indicators of decline/degradation of Brachiaria pastures in the Brazilian Cerrado. Agric Ecosyst Environ 103:289–300
Dubé F, Couto L, Garcia R, Araújo GAA, Leite HG (2000) AvaliaçãoEconômica de um sistema agroflorestal com eucalyptus sp. No Noroeste de Minas Gerais: o caso da Companhia Mineira de Metais. Rev Árvore 24:437–443
EMBRAPA CERRADO (1999) Embrapa Cerrados: conhecimentos, tecnologias e compromisso ambiental. Planaltina, 34 p
Gama-Rodrigues EF, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Gama-Rodrigues AC, Baligar VC, Machado RCR (2010) Carbon storage in soil-size fractions under cacao agroforestry systems in Bahia, Brazil. Environ Manag 45:274–283
Garrett HE (2009) North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, 369 p
Grace J, José JS, Meir P, Miranda HS, Montes RA (2006) Productivity and carbon flux of tropical savannas. J Biogeogr 33:387–400
Haile SG, Nair PKR, Nair VD (2008) Carbon storage of different soil-size fractions in Florida silvopastoral systems. J Environ Qual 37:1789–1797
Haile SG, Nair VD, Nair PKR (2010) Contribution of trees to soil carbon sequestration in silvopastoral systems of Florida. Glob Change Biol 16:427–438
Howlett D (2009) Environmental amelioration potential of silvopastoral agroforestry systems in Spain: soil carbon sequestration and phosphorus retention. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville
Howlett DS, Mosquera-Losada M-R, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A (2011) Soil carbon storage in silvopastoral systems and a treeless pasture in northwestern Spain. J Environ Qual. doi:10.2134/jeq2010.0145
IBGE (2006) Censo Agropecuário 2006: resultados preliminares. Instituto Brasileiro de Geagrafia e Estatística, Rio de Janeiro. Available at http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/agropecuaria/censoagro/2006/agropecuario.pdf. Accessed Jan 2011
Lucas NM (2004) Desempenho animal em sistemas silvipastoril com acácia-negra (Acácia mearnssi De Wild.) e rendimento de matéria seca de cultivares de Panicum maximum sob dois regimes de luz solar. In: Zootecnia. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Maria, Brazil, 127 p
Machado RB, Neto MBR, Pereira PGP, Caldas EF, Gonçalves DA, Santos NS, Tabor K, Steininger M (2004) Estimativas de perda da área do Cerrado brasileiro. Conservação Internacional, Brasília, DF p. 26. Available at http://www.conservation.org.br/arquivos/RelatDesmatamCerrado.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2010
Mosquera-Losada MR, McAdam J, Rigueiro-Rodriguez A (eds) (2005) Silvopastoralism and sustainable land management. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 418 p
Nair PKR (1993) An introduction to agroforestry. Kluwer Academic, The Netherlands, 499 p
Nair PKR, Gordon AM, Mosquera-Losada MR (2008) Agroforestry. In: Jorgensen SE, Faith BD (eds) Encyclopedia of ecology. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 101–110
Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM, Showalter JM (2010) Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv Agron 108:237–307
Reatto A, Correia JR, Spera ST (1998) Solos do Bioma Cerrado: aspectos pedologicos. In: Sano SM, Almeida SP (eds) Cerrado: Ambiente e Flora. EMBRAPA-CPAC, Planaltina, pp 47–87
Resck DVS (1998) Agricultural intensification systems and their impact on soil and water quality in the cerrado of Brazil. In: Lal R (ed) Soil quality and agricultural sustainability. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, pp 288–300
Saha SK, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM (2009) Soil carbon stock in relation to plant diversity of homegarden systems in Kerala, India. Agroforest Syst 76:56–65
Saha SK, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM (2010) Carbon storage in relation to soil size-fractions under some tropical tree-based land use systems. Plant Soil 328:433–446
Sano EE, Barcellos AO, Bezerra HS (2000) Assessing the spatial distribution of cultivated pasture in the Brazilian savanna. Pasturas Trop 22:2–15
Silva JLS (1998) Produtividade de componentes de um sistema silvipastoril constituído por Eucalyptus saligna e pastagens cultivadas e nativas no Rio Grande do Sul. In: Zootecnia. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 178 p
Silva JLS, Saibro JC, Castilhos ZMS (2001) Situação da pesaquisa e utilização de sistemas silvipastoris no Rio Grande do Sul. In: Carvalho MM, Alvim MJ, Carneiro JC (eds) Sistemas Agroflorestais pecuários: opção de sustentabilidade para áreas tropicais e subtropicais. FAO, Juiz de Fora, pp 257–283
Takimoto A, Nair PKR, Nair VD (2008) Carbon stock and sequestration potential of traditional and improved agroforestry systems in the West African Sahel. Agric Ecosyst Environ 125:159–166
Takimoto A, Nair VD, Nair PKR (2009) Soil carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry practices in the West African Sahel. Agroforest Syst 76:11–25
Tonucci RG, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Garcia R, Bernardino FS (2011) Soil carbon storage in silvopasture and related land use systems in the Brazilian Cerrado. J Environ Qual. doi:10.2134/jeq2010.0162
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nair, P.K.R., Tonucci, R.G., Garcia, R., Nair, V.D. (2011). Silvopasture and Carbon Sequestration with Special Reference to the Brazilian Savanna (Cerrado). In: Kumar, B., Nair, P. (eds) Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems. Advances in Agroforestry, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1630-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1630-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1629-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1630-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)