Abstract
The United Nation’s (1948) declaration to promote human rights, the forces of international globalisation and the complex issues arising from population migrations inevitably demand national and ethnic recognition and identity. The unique position of indigenous peoples has placed increasing pressure on teachers to examine and change their practice. This chapter focusses on the problems faced by non-indigenous teachers in visual arts education who are required or desire to teach indigenous forms of knowledge. Contextualised within New Zealand, a country in which the indigenous Mäori are protected by Te Tiriti o Waitangi – The Treaty of Waitangi signed in 1840 with the British Crown – all students, whatever their ethnicity, are required by statute to become cognisant of the art and culture of the indigenous people. Visual arts teachers, whether indigenous or non-indigenous, therefore have this as a curriculum responsibility. Drawing on my experiences as a nonindigenous teacher and teacher educator in the visual arts, and on case study research in New Zealand schools, I highlight issues related to the kinds of learning that teachers may need when judging how they position indigenous knowledge in their programmes. Underlying philosophical issues, curricular demands and educational practice in the problematical context of the changing nature of indigenous knowledge are also discussed. I assert that non-indigenous visual arts teachers can be empowered to work with indigenous forms of knowledge with integrity and sensitivity. The challenges they face and the professional strategies for teacher learning are considered relevant to all teachers in other curriculum areas working within culturally diverse societies.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Ah Nee-Benham, M.K.P. (ed.) (2000): Indigenous educational models for contemporary practice: In our mother's voice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Anderson, T. (1997): ‘Towards a postmodern approach to art education’, in Hutchens, J. & Suggs, M. (eds.), Art education: Content and practice in a postmodern era. Reston, VA: The National Art Education Association, pp.62-73.
Armitage, A. (1995): Comparing the policy of Aboriginal assimilation: Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Banks, J.A. (2001): ‘Citizen education and diversity: Implications for teacher education’. Journal of Teacher Education, Vol.52, No.1, pp.5-16.
Bishop, R. & Glynn, T. (1999): Culture counts: Changing power relations in education. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
Boughton, D. & Mason, R. (eds.) (1999): Beyond multi-cultural art education: International perspectives. New York: Waxmann.
Chalmers, F.G. (1995): ‘European ways of talking about the art of the Northwest Coast First Nations’. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies, Vol.XV, No.1, pp.113-127.
Chalmers, F.G. (1996): Celebrating pluralism: Art, education, and cultural diversity. Los Angeles, CA: The J. Paul Getty Trust.
Chalmers, F.G. (1999): ‘Cultural colonialism and art education: Eurocentric and racist roots of art education’, in Boughton, D. & Mason, R. (eds.), Beyond multi-cultural art education: International perspectives. New York: Waxmann, pp.173-183.
Chalmers, F.G. (2003): ‘ Dragon boats and other waka: Implications for art education in Aotearoa, New Zealand’, in Grierson, E. & Smith, J. (eds.), Nga Waka, Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Art Educators refereed conference proceedings. Wellington: Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Art Educators, Vol.1, pp.257-274.
Christie, W. (1999): New Zealand education and treatyism. Auckland: Wyvern Press.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2001): ‘Learning to teach against the grain’. Harvard Educational Review, Vol.61, No.3, pp.279-310.
Duncum, P. (2001): ‘Theoretical foundations for an art education of global culture and principles for classroom practice’. International Journal of Education and the Arts, Vol.2, No.3, retrieved 12 December 2004, from http://ijea.asu.edu/v2n3
Efland, A. Freedman, K. & Stuhr, P. (1996): Postmodern art education: An approach to curriculum. Reston, VA: The National Art Education Association.
Freedman, K. (2000): ‘Social perspectives on art education in the U.S.: Teaching visual culture in a democracy’. Studies in Art Education, Vol.41, No.4, pp.314-329.
Goldstein, B.S.C. (1998): ‘Creating a context for collaborative consultation: Working across bi-cultural communities’. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, Vol.9, No.4, pp.367-374.
Grierson, E.M. & Mansfield, J.E. (eds.) (2003): The arts in education: Critical perspectives from Aotearoa New Zealand. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
Hakiwai, A. (1996): ‘Mäori society today: Welcome to our world’, in Starzecka, D. (ed.), Mäori art and culture. Auckland: David Bateman, pp.50-68.
Hall, A. & Bishop, R. (2001): ‘Teacher ethics, professionalism and cultural diversity’. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, Vol.36, No.2, pp.187-202.
Irwin, R., Rogers, T. & Farrell, R. (1999): ‘Multi-culturalism denies the realities of Aboriginal artist and culture’, in Boughton, D. & Mason, R. (eds.), Beyond multi-cultural art education: International perspectives. New York: Waxmann, pp.49-64.
Jahnke, R. (1995): ‘Dialogue: Talking past each other’, in Holmes, J. (ed.), Biculturalism, multi-culturalism and the visual arts: Papers presented at the Auckland Conference of University Art and Design Schools. Hobart: University of Tasmania, pp.5-17.
Jahnke, R. (2003): ‘Mäori visual culture on the run’, in Grierson, E. & Smith, J. (eds.), Nga Waka, Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Art Educators refereed conference proceedings. Wellington: Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Art Educators, Vol.1, pp.13-26.
Mead, H.M. (ed.) (1984): Te Mäori: Mäori art from New Zealand collections. Auckland: Heinemann.
Mead, H.M. (1997): Landmarks, bridges and visions: Aspects of Maori culture. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
Ministry of Education. (2000): The arts in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
Nieto, S. (1992): Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multi-cultural education. New York: Longman.
Nieto, S. (2000): ‘Placing equity front and center: Some thoughts on transforming teacher education for a new century’. Journal of Teacher Education, Vol.51, No.3, pp.180-187.
Pound, F. (1994): The space between: Päkehä use of Mäori motifs in modernist New Zealand art. Auckland: Workshop Press.
Ritchie, J. (2003): ‘Bi-cultural development in early childhood care and education in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Views of teachers and teacher educators’. Early Years, Vol.23, No.1, pp.7-19.
Sleeter, C. (2001): ‘Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools: Research and the overwhelming presence of whiteness’. Journal of Teacher Education, Vol.52, No.2, pp.94-106.
Smith, D.J. (1997): ‘Indigenous peoples extended family relationships: A source for classroom structure’. McGill Journal of Education, Vol.32, pp.125-138.
Smith, J. (2001): Bi-culturalism: The relationship between education policy and art education practice in secondary schools in Aotearoa New Zealand. Unpublished Master of Education thesis, University of South Australia, Adelaide.
Smith, J. (2003a): ‘Must we? Should we? Can we...teach Mäori art? The dilemmas of bi-cultural policy in art education practice in Aotearoa New Zealand’, in Grierson, E. & Smith, J. (eds.), Nga Waka, Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Art Educators refereed conference proceedings. Wellington: Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Art Educators, Vol.1, pp.49-66.
Smith, J. (2003b): ‘Supporting non-Mäori art teachers to teach Mäori art education’. Paper presented at Nga Waka, Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Art Educators Conference, Auckland.
Smith, J. (2005): ‘Visual arts education: Investigating curriculum content in Auckland Secondary schools' programmes at years 9-10’. Unpublished research report, University of Auckland, Faculty of Education, Auckland.
Smith, L. (1998): Decolonising methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books.
United Nations (1948-1998): ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights, December 1948’, retrieved 12 May 2000, from http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html; http://www.unhchr.ch/udhr/lang/eng.htm.
Vasil, R. (1993): Bi-culturalism: Reconciling Aotearoa with New Zealand. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
Walker, P. (2001): The fox boy. London: Bloomsbury Press.
Whitecliffe, G. (1999): ‘Issues of multi-cultural art education in New Zealand’, in Boughton, D. & Mason, R. (eds.), Beyond multi-cultural art education: International perspectives. New York: Waxmann, pp.213-229.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Comparative Education Research Centre
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, J. (2010). Teaching about Indigenous Forms of Knowledge: Insights from Non-Indigenous Teachers of Visual Arts Education in New Zealand. In: Kwo, O. (eds) Teachers as Learners. CERC Studies in Comparative Education, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9676-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9676-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9675-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9676-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)